Are BG Civil war scenarios shorter/smaller? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [American Civil War] >> John Tiller's Battleground Series

Message

---

coastie_slith -> Are BG Civil war scenarios shorter/smaller? (1/5/2011 5:19:08 AM) I bought Napoleonic Wars and I like the game style and the mechanics. What I find though is that the larger battles, Waterloo & Borodino, are just overwhelming. Instead I've played all the Quatre Bras variants a bunch of times and really like that level of complexity. Even something like Ligny, although it's short, still has a ton of units to move & shoot every turn. Does Civil War have more in the way of the smaller scenarios? I don't mind ones that are a small segment of a larger battle (like in Waterloo & NIR) but I do prefer something that is a self-contained battle like Quatre Bras.

---

simovitch -> RE: Are BG Civil war scenarios shorter/smaller? (1/5/2011 5:13:44 PM) The Civil War Battles offer a lot of battles that are more manageable than Waterloo and especially Borodino. I found even Gettysburg to be less daunting...

---

lordhoff -> RE: Are BG Civil war scenarios shorter/smaller? (1/6/2011 4:15:07 AM) In addition, many of the games (can't remember if all of them) have additional battles; some lead up to the main battle and some completely unrelated such as Wilson Creek.

---

coastie_slith -> RE: Are BG Civil war scenarios shorter/smaller? (1/7/2011 2:48:55 AM) Thanks for the replies, I'll probably pick it up then. It'll be neat to use different armies as well.

---

Page: [1]

Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.71875