|
evwalt -> RE: Play Question (3/29/2011 8:25:03 PM)
|
My comments on Terje:
Removal of generals - Absolutely agree it is too cheap. Should be related to number of stars (ie. a 4 star "head of the nation" should take a HUGE number of points. That being said, I think that for a glory penalty a country should be able to return removed generals (Napoleon anyone?), after, say, 12 months?
Demanding cash - Agree here. It seems that removing cash may be a BIT to expensive
remove walls - Agreed.
scuttle ships - seems a BIT to expensive but I wouldn't make it too much cheaper
claim colonies - this one may be a bit too cheap but not by much
demand province - I don't know about this. True, you can demand a number of provinces if you totally crush the other guy but I think that was how things went. I would also think that if you fixed liberation of countries (ie. allowing them to be liberated even if not adjecent) you would see less provinces being taken. Also, the number of provinces taken is already limited by "adjecent provinces only"
feudal levy - having thought about this, I DO think you should be able to do this but 1) it should cost a lot and 2) you can only force someone's level to move closer to your own (ie. France can make people lower their level (ie. spread the freedom of the revolution) not raise it, etc.). Also, you should NOT be able to delay implimentation of this term (usually until right before the 18 months are up). It must be done immediately.
issue a DoW - fine by me. This does have SOME effect as it prevents supply from being used. That being said I think a "break/no alliance" should also be included in terms. A "break/no alliance" would cause the party to break any existing alliance with the named country, as well as preventing making a new alliance until the term was over.
enforced peace - See below
Of course, the last one bring me back to my point. Was it INTENDED that ANY surrender treaty could be broken after 18 months? If so (and the more I think about it, the more I think that it WAS intended that surrender treaties could be broken after 18 months), then enforced peace terms don't matter. You could impose a peace with a country through surrender for 10 years. At the end of 18 months, the loser simply cancels the treaty, takes the glory hit, and can then go to war again.
Essentially, I guess a designer needs to answer this question so we know if we have screwed up our house rules in this case.
|
|
|
|
