Stauffenberg scenarios

Stauffenberg scenarios (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Norm Koger's The Operational Art Of War III

Message

Raver508 -> Stauffenberg scenarios (4/20/2011 11:26:33 AM)
Does anyone have any ideas whether Daniel McBride is still working on upgrading his scenarios for the latest patch? Its been a long time since I heard anything and he had some good stuff in the old days.

Scout_Pilot -> RE: Stauffenberg scenarios (4/20/2011 11:53:20 AM)
Drang nach Osten! was the best [&o]

1_Lzard -> RE: Stauffenberg scenarios (4/20/2011 5:48:57 PM)
Sorry, Big Guy, not gonna happen........ McB isn't working a bit on ANY of his scenarios, and isn't really answering emails, so I can't tell you when he will, eh? Sux! [:(]

Sensei.Tokugawa -> RE: Stauffenberg scenarios (4/21/2011 8:12:07 AM)
Wong, wrong, wrong!!! Me & an opponent of mine whom I managed to acquire here are getting ready to play his Indopak ( operation "Enduring Freedom" plus hypothetical Indian - Pakistani War ) so I dared to inquire whether that one is going to work properly under the newest patch - after all that was only and still is aplay test version at the Rugged Defense site. I wrote him a message and he promptly answered in some hour or two at worst. Albeit that was a short reply it was nevertheless absolutely formative. Dunno if we is working on aything though - I didn't ask, but a couple of month ago it was announced at the site that he and a companion of his are reworking the Drang nacht Osten scenario ...

1_Lzard -> RE: Stauffenberg scenarios (4/21/2011 11:44:13 AM)
Interesting. Well, he certainly isn't answering MY emails, which is wierd as I'm one of his playtesters and was running DnA........months ago! Maybe I need to check the email addy.........

Sensei.Tokugawa -> RE: Stauffenberg scenarios (4/21/2011 10:04:54 PM)
Yeah, I understand ... Well, unless that was somebody else emulating him in a definitely not the funniest way possible - using his e-mail adress which would be illegal if I can remember well - I am perfectly sure that I got a reply. What was the address then? I am absolutely sure that when I first sent my message at the address covered in the readme .pdf document attached to the copy of the scenario, it bounced off immediately. So I must have found an alternative one - I think it was somewhere at the Rugged Defense site or at least I was redirected from there to his Stauffenberg scenarios section where I might have found that other address of his.Yup, most definitely. As soon as he answered, I let my opponent know that we are good to go in terms of the technical details s we should not bother too much any longer. So provided I was not malignant ... Pardon my sarcastic tone if that may be the case You read it, it's truly not my real purpose, I just realized that it might be taken as such.[:)]

Telumar -> RE: Stauffenberg scenarios (4/21/2011 11:16:15 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: 1_Lzard Interesting. Well, he certainly isn't answering MY emails, which is wierd as I'm one of his playtesters and was running DnA........months ago! Maybe I need to check the email addy......... Didn't you change your e-mail adress recently (a streched recently...)? I remember i had your old and you gave me your new one for the Anzio@2km playtest. So maybe your new e-mail adress could fall victim to an agressive spam filter?

1_Lzard -> RE: Stauffenberg scenarios (4/21/2011 11:43:13 PM)
I suppose, Stefan, but it seems unlikely.......I'll need to check. Nope, had good mail befor! Beats me! No fears, burroughs! His addy is <drmcb(at)videotron(dot)ca> which has had succesful commos between us. I have no doubt that he responded, just seems strange, lol! Maybe he's recently changed addies? Oh well, all I can say is I'm still waiting on a return to testing with him, etc etc and haven't heard dick! Make of this what ever works for ya, eh? [X(]

Page: [1]

Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.0625