DaBabes - re-closed (Full Version)

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Opponents Wanted



Message


stateless -> DaBabes - re-closed (8/2/2011 1:53:11 AM)

Two false starts so far but hoping that the third time will be lucky.


Requirements:
DaBabes
2 Day turns
Fairly slow game – my goal is 4-5 turns a week
Clean, non gamey, historical style
Latest beta

Preferences but negotiable:
Babes Scenario C with reduced cargo capacities
Dec 8th start
WiF style map
I'd love to try out the latest anti-über stacks pwhex mod
Allies, but wouldn’t mind playing as Japan.
Quiet-ish China with no strategic bombing
Restricted Units can’t cross national boundaries
Anything else that makes sense



PM me if interested




stateless -> RE: DaBabes - either side (8/3/2011 11:26:39 PM)

Anybody?




James Fennell -> RE: DaBabes - closed (8/11/2011 12:01:23 AM)

Tom,

Just a quick note on style. My plan is to only use the forces to their actual designed or used capabilities (as far i my knowledge goes!) - nothing mad or capitalizing on the engine's peccadilloes. In particular I'll stick to the orthodoxy of Japanese pre-war organization & training e.g. rough ratios of artillery units in corps, trained structure of fleets and TFs etc. Of course that does not preclude different "strategic options" - but I'm assuming that whatever strategic option was chosen, the basic military organization and tactical and operational training built up from 1905 would have been impossible to change overnight. Of course i might get it wrong - but if it looks unrealistic shout blue murder.

former naval person (i know cheesy, its Churchill to Roosevelt = but its also true for me)




stateless -> RE: DaBabes - reopened (10/25/2011 6:40:06 AM)

I have a Japanese Dec 7th start ready to go. This is Dababes scenario C so the allies should have me beat by mid 42.




Squamry -> RE: DaBabes - reopened (10/26/2011 10:33:25 AM)

PM sent




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
2.296875