A strange pacific war tale (Full Version)

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition



Message

kaleidoscope -> A strange pacific war tale (10/30/2011 5:26:50 PM)

Read this quite a few years ago
and the story lodged in my memory.

During the reconquest of the Philippines,
the Americans had put an airbase into operation.
The primitive ground radar spotted an approaching contact and a
combat air patrol was vectored to investigate.

The blip was a P-40 and the patrol pilot noticed it
had strange markings, The P-40 was allowed to land
but it did a belly flop and burst into flames.

Wedged inside the cockpit wreckage,
was the mangled remains not only
of the pilot, but an additional passenger both
burnt beyond recognition.

Strangest of all, the P-40 had no landing gear
whatsoever.

The odd markings were early war Army Air Force
markings.

It sounds like this incident could have been some holdout pilot(s)
that had somehow managed to avoid capture during the
initial Japanese conquest, perhaps hiding out at some
remote island airstrip. Or, it could have been a
desperate Japanese suicide mission using
a captured aircraft.

I believe I read it in a book by Reader's Digest
titled "True Stories of World War II". Not sure though,
its been so long ago.

Has anyone heard of this story discussed at all elsewhere
and maybe have additional info?



Terminus -> RE: A strange pacific war tale (10/30/2011 5:41:25 PM)

If it had "no landing gear", how did it take off? A slingshot?[8|]



kaleidoscope -> RE: A strange pacific war tale (10/30/2011 6:34:32 PM)

Elevated inclined ramp with a sea cliff Terminus? :)
That is one reason it is a strange story.

[image]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v359/DriveMeMild/maga.jpg[/image]





wdolson -> RE: A strange pacific war tale (10/30/2011 7:01:09 PM)

I've never heard the story before, but if they had pieced together a plane, they might have had some sort of ejectable landing gear that got them off the ground and then dropped away once airborne.  It's also possible the landing gear was not supposed to drop away, but did accidentally.

Bill



Smeulders -> RE: A strange pacific war tale (10/30/2011 7:10:13 PM)

Sounds like an urban legend, there is just too much wrong about it.

1. As Terminus says, no landing gear ?

If the pilots were American.
2. How did they know that the Americans had landed ?
3. How did they know which airfield to fly to ?
4. Why fly, if true, the aircraft hasn't flown in 4 years, not quite a safe venture if you can wait for the advance of ground forces instead.
5. In four years they didn't come into contact with any Philippine resistance groups/villagers who could recount the story later ?
6. If they still had the avgas, why not try to escape to the DEI early in the war ?

If Japanese
2. Early war air force markings ? If you want to look American it's not hard to repaint in a modern scheme. In the 4 years the plane would probably have been painted as a test/trainer plane.
3. If I read the story correctly, they tried to land, doesn't sound like a kamikaze attack.
4. 2 guys in the plane for a kamikaze attack ?



wdolson -> RE: A strange pacific war tale (10/30/2011 7:20:17 PM)

The Japanese did capture early war US aircraft and repainted them in Japanese schemes.  Some of those planes were recaptured later.

It is possible they didn't have enough avgas to get very far.  If they were in contact with the natives, they would have known when the Americans landed, but then the natives they were in contact with would have told the Americans later about the odd Americans with their plane hidden in the jungle.

A plane that hasn't flown in nearly 4 years is going to be in pretty poor condition.  Especially in the jungle.  All the rubber hoses and fittings would rot among other things.

Bill



AW1Steve -> RE: A strange pacific war tale (10/30/2011 7:22:40 PM)

I've run into the "legend" several times, but with no acreditation. Many aircraft have been launched without permanet landing gear (the ME-163 comes to mind. ). It's a great "ghost story" , it's very entertaining. But I've never seen a single 1st source historical document or account of the "event". And world war 2 was one of the most documented wars in history (at least from the USA side). You can find at the National archives in college park toliet paper requistion reports. The only reason I can think of for such an event occuring without documentation would be the people witnessing such an occurrance would not want their names associated with such a story (such as many air crew would later refuse to file UFO reports).

So there are my two takes. Either "urban legend" (or great story for a Sci-fi type magazine) or a "event too weird to risk reporting. I'd argue against the second as the fast majority of Americans fighting WW2 were either draftee's or "war time only" combatants. Very few professionals were there. And most "hostilities only" warriors couldn't give a fig what the Authorities thought, and only concern of their military career was how soon they could end it.They'd have reported it. Or written a bokk about it as soon as they were out.



Smeulders -> RE: A strange pacific war tale (10/30/2011 7:27:00 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: AW1Steve

I've run into the "legend" several times, but with no acreditation. Many aircraft have been launched without permanet landing gear (the ME-163 comes to mind. ). It's a great "ghost story" , it's very entertaining. But I've never seen a single 1st source historical document or account of the "event". And world war 2 was one of the most documented wars in history (at least from the USA side). You can find at the National archives in college park toliet paper requistion reports. The only reason I can think of for such an event occuring without documentation would be the people witnessing such an occurrance would not want their names associated with such a story (such as many air crew would later refuse to file UFO reports).

So there are my two takes. Either "urban legend" (or great story for a Sci-fi type magazine) or a "event too weird to risk reporting. I'd argue against the second as the fast majority of Americans fighting WW2 were either draftee's or "war time only" combatants. Very few professionals were there. And most "hostilities only" warriors couldn't give a fig what the Authorities thought, and only concern of their military career was how soon they could end it.They'd have reported it. Or written a bokk about it as soon as they were out.



Not to mention that this is a bit different from a UFO-sighting. If a report is filed, there is a ton of physical evidence to back it up, there is the wreck of the plane, the bodies of the pilots, .... Not to mention that it isn't just one or two persons who would have witnessed this, maybe 2 guys could think 'this is too strange to report', but an airbase full of people ?



msieving1 -> RE: A strange pacific war tale (10/30/2011 7:27:02 PM)

Sounds like an old ghost story. I wouldn't take anything in Reader's Digest too seriously.



Terminus -> RE: A strange pacific war tale (10/30/2011 7:50:20 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: kaleidoscope

Elevated inclined ramp with a sea cliff Terminus? :)
That is one reason it is a strange story.



It's not strange, it's moronic. You can't launch an aircraft with a propeller in the front without landing gear.



YankeeAirRat -> RE: A strange pacific war tale (10/30/2011 8:02:13 PM)

That sounds just like a story I heard years ago about a B-17 being able to land after its landing gear was shot away.



wdolson -> RE: A strange pacific war tale (10/30/2011 8:03:11 PM)

If it had happened, I would think people would want to file a report about it because it is likely the people inside were Americans and if a report was filed, there would be a better chance of finding out who they were any notifying next of kin.  So I think it likely that if it was real, there would be more of a record of it.

I believe there was at least one USAAF pilot who became a guerrilla leader on Mindanao.  He came walking out of the jungle with the rest of the Americans left behind when the Allies landed on Mindanao.

Bill



Mac Linehan -> RE: A strange pacific war tale (10/30/2011 8:08:44 PM)

kaleidoscope -

I do recall a similar tale in Martin Caidin's Ragged Rugged Warriors (1966), which starts with the AVG - IIRC.

http://www.amazon.com/Ragged-Rugged-Warriors-Against-Pacific/dp/B000J40K0M/ref=sr_1_2?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1320001633&sr=1-2

Mac



YankeeAirRat -> RE: A strange pacific war tale (10/30/2011 8:09:55 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Terminus


quote:

ORIGINAL: kaleidoscope

Elevated inclined ramp with a sea cliff Terminus? :)
That is one reason it is a strange story.



It's not strange, it's moronic. You can't launch an aircraft with a propeller in the front without landing gear.


Without landing gear?

What about this bird?
[image]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/06/Macon_F9C2_with_landing_gear_replaced_by_fueltank.jpg/220px-Macon_F9C2_with_landing_gear_replaced_by_fueltank.jpg[/image]

Or
What about this one?
[image]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/29/Crew_members_try_to_restart_P2Y_engine_c1939.jpeg[/image]

I am confused does this bird have landing gear
[image]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/ff/Hawker_Hurricane_W9182_On_CAM_Ship.jpg[/image]

[:D][:'(]



Terminus -> RE: A strange pacific war tale (10/30/2011 8:13:46 PM)

Yesss, very clever. Pat yourself on the head and say good boy.[8|]



Capt Cliff -> RE: A strange pacific war tale (10/30/2011 8:16:34 PM)

It's obvious ... the pilot was Wild Bill Kelso!!



YankeeAirRat -> RE: A strange pacific war tale (10/30/2011 8:22:43 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Terminus

Yesss, very clever. Pat yourself on the head and say good boy.[8|]


I try.[:D] Just because I was trying to pull your chain a little bit. It is almost all hollow's eve where I am and traditionally we play tricks before all hollow's eve on friends and co-workers.



JeffroK -> RE: A strange pacific war tale (10/30/2011 10:12:56 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Mac Linehan

kaleidoscope -

I do recall a similar tale in Martin Caidin's Ragged Rugged Warriors (1966), which starts with the AVG - IIRC.

http://www.amazon.com/Ragged-Rugged-Warriors-Against-Pacific/dp/B000J40K0M/ref=sr_1_2?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1320001633&sr=1-2

Mac


So we are talking about Sci Fi!!



kaleidoscope -> RE: A strange pacific war tale (10/30/2011 10:48:22 PM)

I  found some hits that relate roughly similar stories
all of which concern a solitary P-40.

http://www.futilitycloset.com/2011/05/07/the-ghost-plane/
http://www.angelfire.com/weird2/odditiesandcuriosity/p40.html

and finally this discussion at another forum where some underlying facts emerge
which make for some interesting reading both pro and con in regards to this subject.
http://www.schstwa2.tk/the-phantom-p-40

This is a quote from that forum by Dan Ford concerning the P-40 story:

"The author of the original story was
evidently Robert Scott, commander of the 23rd Fighter Group after the
AVG went home. Scott and other USAAF personnel in China thought of
themselves, and the survivors still think of themselves today, as
Flying Tigers, and indeed the various units commanded by Chennault
after July 1942 wore Disney-art Flying Tiger patches, different from
but related to the one created for the AVG.

In answer to how the Phantom P-40 took off if it had no landing gear,
I recall that it was launched on a bamboo skid of some sort.

That Scott did not include this yarn in God Is My Co-pilot suggests
that it was a wild tale with no basis in fact. Given
the time frame, and the small numbers of pilots involved in teh 23rd
FG, it seems almost impossible that he wouldn’t have known about it at
first hand, if it had actually happened."







Joe D. -> RE: A strange pacific war tale (10/31/2011 12:20:02 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Capt Cliff

It's obvious ... the pilot was Wild Bill Kelso!!


Last seen as a POW on an IJN sub heading back to the home islands; maybe he became the American equivalent of "Fuji" on McHales' Navy?



Heeward -> RE: A strange pacific war tale (10/31/2011 2:15:47 AM)

I remember reading this about the mystery P40 from the Philippines lost over china, in the magazine Air Classics back in the mid-late 70's. It was a storywas bit more fleshed out though being a three to four page article.



Skyros -> RE: A strange pacific war tale (10/31/2011 3:14:11 AM)

Sounds more like a story from the comic book "Weird War"



kaleidoscope -> RE: A strange pacific war tale (10/31/2011 6:08:46 AM)

As best I can piece together,
the story first appeared in
print within a book  written
by this fellow, Col. Robert L. Scott.

[image]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v359/DriveMeMild/Robert_L_Scott.jpg[/image]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Lee_Scott,_Jr.

He is otherwise famous
for writing the book "God is my Copilot".
and eventually retired as a brigadier
general.

I suppose this is why the story has legs,
coming from a famous person of some
standing....a genuine war hero ace with
the right stuff and all that razzmatazz.

Does not make the story true but
does explain why the tale has been hard
to permanently put to rest.

Maybe he was simply trying to sell more books :)






JeffroK -> RE: A strange pacific war tale (10/31/2011 7:39:31 AM)

http://www.warbirdforum.com/phantom.htm



dorjun driver -> RE: A strange pacific war tale (10/31/2011 3:23:59 PM)

As we Yanks found to our dismay, one doesn't require "landing" gear.  Simply having "take off" gear will suffice.  In a pinch.



KenchiSulla -> RE: A strange pacific war tale (10/31/2011 3:51:14 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Terminus


quote:

ORIGINAL: kaleidoscope

Elevated inclined ramp with a sea cliff Terminus? :)
That is one reason it is a strange story.



It's not strange, it's moronic. You can't launch an aircraft with a propeller in the front without landing gear.


Yes you can...



mdiehl -> RE: A strange pacific war tale (10/31/2011 6:17:37 PM)

And after the flames had cooled, the wreck recovery team finally noticed the inscription, scrawled in blood, written on the canopy by the dying pilot's hand .... "See You Next Wednesday!"



Nikademus -> RE: A strange pacific war tale (10/31/2011 7:56:24 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Terminus

Yesss, very clever. Pat yourself on the head and say good boy.[8|]



the gear could have been drawn like in that episode of what was it...."Amazing Tales" that featured a trapped ball gunner of a B-17 who saved his life by drawing cartoon landing gear on the B-17 that landed.

oh well. Don't see what the fuss is about. The Japanese regularily cobbled together enough parts to put a plane or two into the air for harrasement purposes long after Rabaul was totally cut off. The lack of landing gear is puzzling but i've heard stranger stuff. Maybe it's just a tale.



sandman455 -> RE: A strange pacific war tale (10/31/2011 9:01:30 PM)

Assuming the plane was salvaged from a previous wreck, its very likely it would have sustained major damage to the gear.

This means that any effort to get it airborne again would have depended on some kind of makeshift gear with most likely a skid system. It would have to be very short and stout to support the stress but it could be done with wood. After that all you would need is a hard packed beach or maybe a very shallow surf. The Philippines might have a few of those.

Our two hold outs, who were undoubtably already nuts, were very worried all the military activity would have IJ units finding them first. So they decide the time is now to follow some allied aircraft to a field. They make it airborne with bambo gear and they crash and burn on the landing. The fire burns the bambo and you end up with a cool but tragic story.

It's doable and I've retold crazier stories that I know are true.



Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
0.921875