RE: JFB vs. AFB personalities (Full Version)

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> The War Room



Message


SLAAKMAN -> RE: JFB vs. AFB personalities (12/3/2011 8:52:25 PM)

Yes.




mdiehl -> RE: JFB vs. AFB personalities (12/3/2011 9:18:45 PM)

Well, I do *have* WiF4E. When the Matrix version is close to publication I'll likely preorder. Otherwise, no room in the house. The boys are like helium. They immediately fill up any space into which they're released. [8D]




Chickenboy -> RE: JFB vs. AFB personalities (12/3/2011 9:38:01 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Cap Mandrake

I am secretly a Chinese fanboy.

Oh dear. I hope I haven't overshared.


A Chinese "ace" is any pilot who makes it to 40 experience in one lifetime. A Chinese top of the line fighter has fabric wings and was given away to charity by the Russians in 1928.

A Chinese "Army" has 3000 men, half of whom can't use chopsticks and one quarter of whom are not toilet trained.

Then there is the Chinese economy. I always accelerate the construction of the undergound bean curd plant in Chengtu. Ahhh...good times.

They grow underground beans in Chengtu? [X(]




SLAAKMAN -> RE: JFB vs. AFB personalities (12/3/2011 9:41:15 PM)

quote:

Well, I do *have* WiF4E. When the Matrix version is close to publication I'll likely preorder. Otherwise, no room in the house. The boys are like helium. They immediately fill up any space into which they're released.

Maximum effective range of a Hogmutt Satellite Excuse = 0 meters;

http://www.vassalengine.org/wiki/Module:World_in_Flames




mdiehl -> RE: JFB vs. AFB personalities (12/3/2011 9:46:15 PM)

Well then, I will have to start reading the WiFFE rules! Then figure out how to use Vassal. Do they have Adv 3rd Reich or Totaler Krieg there? If they did, I'd be able to contribute alot faster, what with knowing the rules already.




SLAAKMAN -> RE: JFB vs. AFB personalities (12/3/2011 10:22:53 PM)

md-
I havent searched for those 2 yet & they are on the "to do" list....in about 20 years. [:'(] Plus Hogmutt is lucky that he cant go to California to "get to me";

He's got nothing else to do. Sometimes I delete two or more of sock puppets a day. If I could get my hands on him I would kick the **** out of him.

There is no way in hades Slaak is ever getting back on this board. It aint gonna happen. Slaak should be thankful he lives in California, where I can't get to him.

http://www.maddogdrivethru.net/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=10369&start=20

[image]http://www.maddogdrivethru.net/images/smilies/icon_lol.gif[/image]




mdiehl -> RE: JFB vs. AFB personalities (12/3/2011 10:28:16 PM)

We're *all* Californians *now.*

OK. Honestly, I have no idea wtf that means but "There is no 'I' in 'team' but there is an 'I' in 'meat pie.'" was already used.




Mynok -> RE: JFB vs. AFB personalities (12/3/2011 10:33:05 PM)

I see the Trolls have arrived to **** on our thread.

Is it so hard to see what these bastards are mods? Just can't bring yourselves to ban these pig bumpers huh?




SLAAKMAN -> RE: JFB vs. AFB personalities (12/3/2011 10:36:55 PM)

MK
quote:

I see the Trolls have arrived to **** on our thread.

Imagine that. An ogre casting aspersions about trolls!
[:'(]




Mynok -> RE: JFB vs. AFB personalities (12/3/2011 10:54:49 PM)


It is time for raising a ruckus. I'm sick of these ****heads.




SLAAKMAN -> RE: JFB vs. AFB personalities (12/3/2011 10:57:15 PM)

quote:

Is it so hard to see what these bastards are mods? Just can't bring yourselves to ban these pig bumpers huh?

Orders? You giving me orders? Heh, Amigo.....the only thing that bumps in this world...is bwalls.
[image]http://armedrobbery.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/scarface.jpg[/image]




SLAAKMAN -> RE: JFB vs. AFB personalities (12/3/2011 11:00:48 PM)

quote:

It is time for raising a ruckus. I'm sick of these ****heads.

Choose your weapon piggyboy;
[image]http://www.games.lisisoft.com/img/3/5/3570-1-close-combat-3-the-russian-front.jpg[/image]




AW1Steve -> RE: JFB vs. AFB personalities (12/3/2011 11:02:21 PM)

Both sides are masocist in the grand campaign. The allies for the 1st 10 months. Then the JFB's . (If they keep playing....they rarely do). The major difference seems to be in the degree they like "micro management". AFB's have to "micro mangage a lot. JFB's Micro manage to an extreme.

What we really need is a lot more small campaigns. In those it really doesn't matter who you play.

Maybe they can do a spin-off game "Factory Manager in the Pacific" for those who don't want all those pesky interferring "combat moments". [:D]




mdiehl -> RE: JFB vs. AFB personalities (12/3/2011 11:06:11 PM)

In the old GGPW, I always liked playing the Japanese, and the Allies through mid-1943. For me the fun was in seeing how much of Allied combat power you could salvage before it was all isolated, and have these guys waiting in case the Axis player tried to overreach.

On a slightly off-topic note, is there a place where you can find dedicated AARs for games played using the 2-day turn cycle? Are there any "classics" AARs for the 2-day cycle game?




Chickenboy -> RE: JFB vs. AFB personalities (12/3/2011 11:13:37 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SLAAKMAN
Choose your weapon piggyboy;

Hmmm...hard to choose. I think I'll take the poorly rendered, unrealistically bunched and poorly controlled bunch at the open area identified "Konigsplatz". [8|]

Interesting that these massive infantry battles with tens of thousands were rendered by about 30 dudes onscreen. Looks like this game is dated, if it ever was of interest to serious wargamers. I can't imagine that vassal makes it any better.

No thanks.




Mynok -> RE: JFB vs. AFB personalities (12/3/2011 11:19:20 PM)


Seriously? You are baiting trolls? [:@][:@][:@][:@][:@]




Chickenboy -> RE: JFB vs. AFB personalities (12/3/2011 11:20:31 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Mynok


Seriously? You are baiting trolls? [:@][:@][:@][:@][:@]

Why not? Your "poll" on your newly created thread isn't exactly a paragon of forum virtue, mate.




Mynok -> RE: JFB vs. AFB personalities (12/3/2011 11:23:54 PM)

My goals are to get these ****heads off of here. What are yours? Couldn't give a dang about forum virtue as far as these assholes are concerned.




Chickenboy -> RE: JFB vs. AFB personalities (12/3/2011 11:27:21 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Mynok

My goals are to get these ****heads off of here. What are yours? Couldn't give a dang about forum virtue as far as these assholes are concerned.

Well, how's that working out for 'ya?

Your way's been tried and failed. Ridiculing their SPAMed game platform's worth a shot next in my book.

Keep up with the language and you'll get banned for that for guaranteed nil effect, mate.




Mynok -> RE: JFB vs. AFB personalities (12/3/2011 11:29:26 PM)


It's happened before. I'll be happy to suffer a ban if it gets some attention drawn to these ****s.




Mynok -> RE: JFB vs. AFB personalities (12/3/2011 11:30:47 PM)


I have never understood Matrix's tolerance for this crap.




Chickenboy -> RE: JFB vs. AFB personalities (12/3/2011 11:32:10 PM)

Unlikely. You're just putting yourself into trouble for nil effect.

Want I should / other dudes should also contact the mods? Sometimes multiple complaints carry more weight than just one.




SLAAKMAN -> RE: JFB vs. AFB personalities (12/3/2011 11:40:06 PM)

Mr Chickenboy, Do not be mistaken, I have great respect for your astute opinions but in order to clarify, I mused below; [:D]
quote:

Hmmm...hard to choose. I think I'll take the poorly rendered, unrealistically bunched and poorly controlled bunch at the open area identified "Konigsplatz". Interesting that these massive infantry battles with tens of thousands were rendered by about 30 dudes onscreen. Looks like this game is dated, if it ever was of interest to serious wargamers. I can't imagine that vassal makes it any better. No thanks.

(Snicker snicker chortle with mirth....I beg to mention that your analysis was greenhorn....observing that Close Combat; The Russian Front, one of the most fascinating games in wargaming history is played by some of the most dedicated afficiandos in the galaxy....is not played on Vassal!) [:'(]




SLAAKMAN -> RE: JFB vs. AFB personalities (12/3/2011 11:44:11 PM)

quote:

My goals are to get these ****heads off of here. What are yours? Couldn't give a dang about forum virtue as far as these assholes are concerned.

Since mynok wants to make this personal, maybe we should arrange a match in the ring. Im at Ft Bragg NC. Theres plenty of room down in Area J to spar. Anytime youre ready babycakes.
[image]http://fiveouncesofpain.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/royce_gracie4.jpg[/image]




Chickenboy -> RE: JFB vs. AFB personalities (12/3/2011 11:44:32 PM)

Yes. That's quite a non-sequitor you've cobbled together for this argument. I've played the games of which you speak and they no longer hold my interest.

One of the ones you mentioned was quite good as a tactical sim. As a matter of fact, if I wanted to play a tactical sim like that again, I might just go to its germane forum and talk about it. Not here.




Chickenboy -> RE: JFB vs. AFB personalities (12/3/2011 11:48:59 PM)

Like the games of which you speak, Gracie Jiu-Jitsu is a fascinating idea, but not my cup of tea. If I wanted to discuss my preferences for Tang Soo Do, I'd find an appropriate forum to do so.

Surely you must see that posting an oversized image of a Jiu-Jitsu martial artist is not conducive to rational discussion on the JFB/AFB thread that you've 'participated' in, no?

I think I know the answer to this question, unfortunately. I've asked the forum moderator to put a stop to your nonsense, Slakmann. You're not contributing by your SPAMing and your repeated attempts to hijack the spirit of this thread and this forum.




SLAAKMAN -> RE: JFB vs. AFB personalities (12/3/2011 11:50:09 PM)

Forgive me if Im disturbing the forum conformity but removing psychotic threats from the forum should take precedent over having a spot O fun. [:D]




Chickenboy -> RE: JFB vs. AFB personalities (12/3/2011 11:52:40 PM)

Not fun any longer, if it ever was. It's not the forum conformity that is being violated, it's the forum rules-straight up, dude.




SLAAKMAN -> RE: JFB vs. AFB personalities (12/3/2011 11:57:28 PM)

quote:

Not fun any longer, if it ever was. It's not the forum conformity that is being violated, it's the forum rules-straight up, dude.

Oh well you know we all want to hear the plan;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KrkwgTBrW78




AW1Steve -> RE: JFB vs. AFB personalities (12/4/2011 12:38:56 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: SLAAKMAN

Forgive me if Im disturbing the forum conformity but removing psychotic threats from the forum should take precedent over having a spot O fun. [:D]


If you truly feel that it's your civic duty to remove such threats , then I approve! [&o] Now off yourself please! [:D] You've been very successful in creating bad Karma. You can go now, your job is done. [:D]




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
0.703125