RE: Back again, The Ki-44......... (Full Version)

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> The War Room



Message

Grfin Zeppelin -> RE: Back again, The Ki-44......... (2/1/2012 7:54:23 PM)

These tests are indeed very interesting, thanks for the effort, truly appreciated [:)]



SuluSea -> RE: Back again, The Ki-44......... (2/1/2012 11:08:56 PM)

Andre, I had considered doing the IIc at longer distance. Since it's showed itself to be the best of the line it's a good idea to take another run. If anything to make sure the numbers aren't out of line.

from the first test-

Ki-44-IIc results-
78 serviceable
31 damaged
21 write offs
70 air to air kills

Ki-44-IIc casualties
7 damaged
7 write offs
9 air to air losses

and the current-

Ki-44-IIc results-
77 serviceable 
42 damaged 
18 write offs 
63 air to air kills

Ki-44-IIc casualties 
2 damaged 
3 write offs 
5 air to air losses

From the second tests it looks like serviceable stayed relatively the same, but it looks like some kills and write offs that were lacking went into the damaged dept.. On a good note casualties are down to the IIc.



Here are the totals between the three for the 20 runs-

Ki-44-IIa results-
189 serviceable
95 damaged
37 write offs
79 air to air kills

Ki-44-IIa casualties
15 damaged
12 write offs
6 air to air losses

Ki-44-IIb results-
190 serviceable
104 damaged
39 write offs
67 air to air kills

Ki-44-IIb casualties
14 damaged
16 write offs
12 air to air losses

Ki-44-IIc results-
155 serviceable
73 damaged
39 write offs
133 air to air kills

Ki-44-IIc casualties
9 damaged
10 write offs
14 air to air losses





I found something interesting I'm going to test over the next few days. I'll post the details later. The better half is on her way home from work. [;)][:)]



Chickenboy -> RE: Back again, The Ki-44......... (2/1/2012 11:54:46 PM)

Wow! The Ki-44 IIc has real killer potential! Almost double the IIa or IIb, really. My top estimate for 10 tests was 60 a2a kills. Your tests indicated even greater efficacy @ 66.5 / 10 tests.

Again, thanks for the tests. If we meet up, I'm buyin you a beer, mate. [&o]

ETA: Interesting...the Takao-based fighters did ****-all. The Naga-based fighters cut 'em a new corn chute. Almost every time...[&:]



obvert -> RE: Back again, The Ki-44......... (2/2/2012 12:07:25 AM)

Thanks! This is great info. Makes me want to try to run some tests as well!



SuluSea -> RE: Back again, The Ki-44......... (2/2/2012 1:04:09 AM)

Thanks Very Much for the support guys and gals!!![:)][:)][:)][:)]



inqistor -> RE: Back again, The Ki-44......... (2/4/2012 8:08:20 AM)

It is interesting, that IIb have worse results, that IIa, but better, than I model, despite latters having identical armament. It seems even small speed difference have impact.
On the other side, low gun accurancy seems to have serious impact (40mm), but high (doubling for centerline) not that much.

Now, the main problem should be:
what should be 40mm gun statistics, to make IIb model clearly better, than IIa, but still worse, than IIc?



Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
2.4375