Armament bug? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> Tech Support



Message


Peltonx -> Armament bug? (2/14/2012 5:24:31 PM)

I have 1 game September 1941.
The 9/1941 game my pts had been growing by about 6k per turn, then I lost about 40,000 in one turn.
7/1942 game was up and down around 100,000k with the loss of 10k and gain of 5k some turns. Last turn I lost 47,000.
I have another game that is in December of 1942 and the first turn no big drop 2,000.
My game vs Kamil is summer of 1944 and I am getting hammered and my armament points are only dropping about 12k per turn.

Anyone esle seeing this?

If it is an issue, it must be with an early war item.

I see what I can find, but not sure what I am looking for.

Pelton




Joel Billings -> RE: Armament bug? (2/14/2012 5:30:03 PM)

Could be a major upgrade of a particular OB that causes consumption of a lot of armaments to bring in the new equipment.




whollaborg -> RE: Armament bug? (2/15/2012 2:15:07 PM)

Hmm,

Maybe in the game 9/41 you got the railroads in the center back up and running after two turns of no supply for the central army group. There could have been a drain of armaments as quite a many of your divisions were pushed back during the time supply was cut.




Peltonx -> RE: Armament bug? (2/15/2012 11:18:02 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Joel Billings

Could be a major upgrade of a particular OB that causes consumption of a lot of armaments to bring in the new equipment.


My first turn vs M60 -121,000 yes 121,000 in one turn

here is report i do not see anything that would cost 121,000

If it says cost 9999 Arm pts thats a bug right?

Pelton




[image]local://upfiles/20387/B5310C02B6EF4F66B0FB8F9F3C741D31.jpg[/image]




Peltonx -> RE: Armament bug? (2/15/2012 11:25:03 PM)

like this one?

[image]local://upfiles/20387/AD3720BB60FE48BEABC58C492260F272.jpg[/image]




elmo3 -> RE: Armament bug? (2/15/2012 11:38:33 PM)

I thought a build cost of 9999 meant it would never get built but Pavel or Joel would have to confirm that. I may be confusing it with something else.




Denniss -> RE: Armament bug? (2/15/2012 11:51:35 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: elmo3

I thought a build cost of 9999 meant it would never get built but Pavel or Joel would have to confirm that. I may be confusing it with something else.

Should be correct - non-buildable.




Peltonx -> RE: Armament bug? (2/15/2012 11:53:08 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: elmo3

I thought a build cost of 9999 meant it would never get built but Pavel or Joel would have to confirm that. I may be confusing it with something else.


the 37 mm was 9999 but got built I beleive.

But mybee thats how they fixed it not sure myself.




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
0.703125