Chickenboy -> RE: Meet the Forumites (4/13/2012 12:47:26 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: wdolson quote:
ORIGINAL: Canoerebel I think John is right! I've never had a laptop and I have two sons (and one daughter)! I've long suspected that I was pretty studly and virile, but this confirms it! Miller and Chez Da Jez are undoubtedly envious of me, but that old rascal, John III, has a couple of boys, so he's all man too! A while back I did read about a theory that there are some factors that might produce more female children than male, but the difference is with the mothers. Apparently some women's system are hostile to male fetuses. The article said that there are more male children than female conceived, but something like 70 or 80% of miscarriages are male. So the birthrate ends up being very close to 50/50. So if you have more daughters than sons, it's probably due to the mother rather than anything you did. Bill Nah. You're overlooking the most important sex determinant in humans. The heterozygous (well, it's heterozygous ~50% of the time) sex gene (either a "Y" or "X") is invariably donated by the male sperm. Whichsoever sperm wins the fertility lottery will determine the baby sex by it's donation of chromosomal identity to the embryo. In terms of raw numbers, men (or their 'contribution' to the fertility process) have more to do with the sex of offspring than females. Henry VIII has nobody to blame but himself and the vagaries of dumb luck. Sure, there may be the odd miscarriage to change the numbers a bit, but it's still mostly male contributions.
|
|
|
|