wdolson -> RE: OT: Radios (5/21/2012 11:53:14 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: wdolson I suppose in the same way scientists of the 1700s believed that heavier than air flight was impossible. I give it 50/50 odds there is some workable way around the speed of light barrier, but we probably won't find the key in our lifetimes. However, you can't predict when a major scientific or engineering breakthrough will happen that changes the whole playing field. Bill quote:
ORIGINAL: JWE I'll take that bet, if you are suggesting we can ever achieve a velocity v' greater then c. However, I will grant that there are ways to fudge it. Jose Alcubierre found one way; not physically possible, but noteworthy. There aren't many people looking at the nature space-time. At least not in this context. Jose was a pioneer in this regard, and offers some interesting possibilities as to understanding curvature. Curvature is a simple word that is used to describe certain things, but the concept and math are way different. I think the answer will be found in our more complete understanding of space-time. Btw ,it also follows simultanaety. University of Arizona has people who are thinking along these lines. UA, Huntsville, has some too. C'mon on over and take a Philisophy of Science course with us. I don't believe we will ever be able to exceed the speed of light (the equations start getting imaginary numbers for one thing), but we may find a way around it as suggested by various SF authors like hyperspace, warp drive, or worm holes. There is some math to suggest that some of these things may even be possible, though the science is a long ways from reality. Bill
|
|
|
|