|
Capitaine -> (1/17/2003 12:02:06 AM)
|
Tuning in late to the discussion but do like the way it proceeds. :cool:
Surrender really, really should remain as close to the game as possible, as most state. It's okay to add more "realism" if elected, but please do no detract from the game and the nature of military alliances the way EU and EU2 did. As long as a rational method can be devised for surrendering to a coalition, giving proper weight to historical factors that would've been involved in each coalition member's "voice" in the terms, it'll be fine.
I've played EIA a number of times, but not excessively, so my memory is a bit rusty. I'll get out my copy and peruse it for anything I might add, now that my eye has alit on this game discussion. ;)
Great job by producer talking with customers about development decisions and issues. :cool:
|
|
|
|
