Alfred -> RE: When is an Allied fighter unit carrier capable? (7/3/2012 5:09:31 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Sardaukar quote:
ORIGINAL: Alfred 5. It is possible to advance a squadron from "carrier trained" to "carrier capable". It requires the "carrier trained" squadron spending about 3 months on a carrier. It is not possible to convert a non "carrier trained" squadron into one. Alfred Alfred, it's just opposite (though minor thing). Unit can be "carrier capable" and take more Ops losses, and then in time, it becomes "carrier trained". Latter means it is fully trained & experienced with CV operations. Ha! Never thought I'd catch Alfred with an error. [:D] 7.0.1.1.1 in manual: Carrier Trained aircraft are noted as such on their Air Unit Information Screen. They function normally on Carriers, and may take off and land on a Carrier and perform non-transfer Missions from it. Certain other units will be listed as Carrier Capable on their Air Unit Information Screen. These planes may be fully functional on Aircraft Carriers, but have a higher chance of suffering Operational Losses during take-offs and landings. Just because an aircraft is Carrier Capable (i.e. it is built for carrier operations, having a tail hook and other necessary equipment) does not mean the pilot flying it is trained to land and take off from one. Quite correct. I had them in reverse order. Good catch. Shows what happens if one doesn't always double check before posting. Or I could just say I was testing the forum. Yea, that's it.[:)] The fundamental point remains that the two key parameters are squadron and plane suitability. Both are separate issues and fundamentally independent of each other. In order to minimise confusion it might be worthwhile for michaelm in any new patch to remove the term "carrier capable" from the aircraft model screen and replace it with a different term, such as "tail hook equipped". Alfred
|
|
|
|