RE: 2 v 2 [Recruiting]

RE: 2 v 2 [Recruiting] (Full Version)

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Advanced Tactics Series >> Opponents Wanted

Message

Meanfcker -> RE: 2 v 2 [Recruiting] (9/30/2012 6:30:16 PM)
Well that is too bad. We will regen and start all over as soon as we have a fourth. This will be Strategic and Operational level warfarel It will be and xx large map with no PBEM protection so that the very long turns may be done in more than one sitting. Any takers?

kombrig -> RE: 2 v 2 [Recruiting] (10/1/2012 8:00:48 AM)
You can count me in.

LazyBoy -> RE: 2 v 2 [Recruiting] (10/1/2012 12:03:12 PM)
Will we start a new map? I prefer we carry on with this one as I have just about completed my first turn.

Meanfcker -> RE: 2 v 2 [Recruiting] (10/1/2012 1:06:36 PM)
Cool, welcome Kombrig. We had already started a our first turns, and unfortunately one of our opponents dropped out. Kombrig, could you please email me? pas.x@hotmail.com Once I have your email I can invite you to the game dropbox. You should email your teammate, Hatemf90 so that you guys can properly coordinate your actions. Lazyboy, I know it is a lot of work but it is really proper that I regerate and that we are starting fresh. I have to go out today but I will regen and post new map in dropbox and then try to complete my turn tonight. Meanfcker.

kombrig -> RE: 2 v 2 [Recruiting] (10/1/2012 5:58:49 PM)
E-mails sent to Meanfcker and Hatemf90

Meanfcker -> RE: 2 v 2 [In progress] (10/2/2012 4:55:17 PM)
I have completed first turn and put in Dropbox. Good luck and have fun. Meanfcker

LazyBoy -> RE: 2 v 2 [In progress] (10/3/2012 9:52:02 AM)
Completed turn 1 Turn 1 for Royal Perm in drop box. Good luck, hope we all have a good game

kombrig -> RE: 2 v 2 [In progress] (10/3/2012 11:56:58 AM)
Hasn't gotten response from Hatemf90 yet. Which one of us should go first?

Meanfcker -> RE: 2 v 2 [In progress] (10/3/2012 3:01:45 PM)
I suggest that you wait until you communicate with your ally. Whichever of you is the most experienced map reader and strategist should assume Supreme Command and should go first. Your Supreme Commander should be bold and creative when developing Strategic and Operational concepts. Our team wont waste even one unit of Oil on movements that are not directly involved in securing Operational Objectives. Meanfcker.

kombrig -> RE: 2 v 2 [In progress] (10/6/2012 10:12:40 PM)
Hatem, are you still in? Haven't recieved any message from you.

Meanfcker -> RE: 2 v 2 [In progress] (10/7/2012 9:38:08 PM)
I haven't seen anything from Hatem for a few days. Lets give him a day or two.

LazyBoy -> RE: 2 v 2 [In progress] (10/8/2012 12:24:04 AM)
This may be a non starter[:(]

kombrig -> RE: 2 v 2 [In progress] (10/8/2012 9:23:03 AM)
I guess if Hatem doesn't show up by tomorrow, let's reopen recruiting then.

hatemf90 -> RE: 2 v 2 [In progress] (10/8/2012 3:32:17 PM)
hey guys, first of all thanks for waiting [:'(] its been kind of a busy week... anyway I replied to kombrig and got mean's invite, so lets get this started. [:)]

hatemf90 -> RE: 2 v 2 [In progress] (10/8/2012 4:32:38 PM)
btw who is royal perm? should I play the turn or wait? did you find a replacement? just checking.

kombrig -> RE: 2 v 2 [In progress] (10/8/2012 5:22:27 PM)
Nice to hear from you [:)] Sent you an e-mail.

LazyBoy -> RE: 2 v 2 [In progress] (10/10/2012 1:24:39 AM)
Welcome back[:)] I don't know who is the next player in the turn sequence, so used the regime name. We need to put the turn order in this thread.

Meanfcker -> RE: 2 v 2 [In progress] (10/10/2012 3:12:40 AM)
Perhaps I was unclear with my intentions. I left their turn order up to them. That way they may choose their own Supremo, and the Supremo should go first. Meanie

kombrig -> RE: 2 v 2 [In progress] (10/10/2012 6:20:08 AM)
Our turn order is: 1) kombrig (Royal Perm) 2) Hatem (Bordeaux). We don't have as strict command structure, but we do have coordinated actions and general strategic and operational plans to follow. I'll finish my turn probably today. Good luck to everyone!

kombrig -> RE: 2 v 2 [In progress] (10/10/2012 8:12:07 PM)
Hatem's turn is in dropbox.

Meanfcker -> RE: 2 v 2 [In progress] (10/21/2012 1:22:30 PM)
I only have one question. Wtf is going on? I just want to start killing a few fckers, is that really so bad? Hatem, could you please inform us of your intentions? Meanfcker.

kombrig -> RE: 2 v 2 [In progress] (10/24/2012 2:02:45 PM)
Haven't heard anything about Hatem since I put the turn in dropbox. Should we reopen recruitment?

hadley -> RE: 2 v 2 [In progress] (10/24/2012 3:17:51 PM)
I've played with Hatem in other games. He has a tendency to disappear for weeks at a time. Good luck... Doug

LazyBoy -> RE: 2 v 2 [In progress] (10/25/2012 12:22:31 AM)
I think reopen recruitment

Meanfcker -> RE: 2 v 2 [In progress] (10/25/2012 10:55:07 AM)
If we don't hear from Hatem by tonight we will re-open recruiting

Meanfcker -> RE: 2 v 2 [In progress] (10/26/2012 11:19:40 AM)
Ok, It appears as if Hatemf90 is not particularly interested in this game. We are once again looking for a fourth. It is only fair that we regen map and redo first turn when we find an opponent. Any takers? This will be a tough, but very educational game for all. Meanfcker.

ironduke1955 -> RE: 2 v 2 [In progress] (10/26/2012 4:55:57 PM)
Ok if no more qualified takers are available count me in.

Meanfcker -> RE: 2 v 2 [In progress] (10/27/2012 1:59:44 PM)
Ok I will set up a new one tomorrow morning. The only criteria for choosing a map will be this, I will be make sure that the map gives no one player any particular vulnerabilities due to road/rail isolation. I wil go first, hand over to Lazyboy and he will put in the dropbox for your Supremo. Let us know who to send the game to after Lazy. Iron, I will reinvite you to drop box. Good luck and have fun. Meanfcker.

ironduke1955 -> RE: 2 v 2 [In progress] (10/27/2012 6:32:27 PM)
Kombrig will be CC.

Meanfcker -> RE: 2 v 2 [In progress] (10/29/2012 11:05:11 AM)
Turn done and game sent to Lazy

Page: << < prev 1 [2] 3 4 5 next > >>

Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.90625