Strategic bombing overrated?

Strategic bombing overrated? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War I] >> Commander - The Great War

Message

ulver -> Strategic bombing overrated? (12/26/2012 10:31:08 PM)
In every single game as the Entente where France didn’t fall I have reduced the Ruhr to rubble ( 0 PB) by the end of 1915 with French bombers - that seems massively excessive. By the end of the war 4 engine heavy strategic bombers were being build that might have accomplished something like that but not in 1915. You really need to remove that strategic bombardment from bombers until much later technology is researched. It is perfectly fine as a late war what-if technology but right now it is just to easy.

JJKettunen -> RE: Strategic bombing overrated? (12/26/2012 10:50:00 PM)
Agreed.

Jestre -> RE: Strategic bombing overrated? (12/26/2012 10:52:47 PM)
Also agree, strategic bombing is enormously overpowered.

warspite1 -> RE: Strategic bombing overrated? (12/26/2012 11:38:18 PM)
+1

parusski -> RE: Strategic bombing overrated? (12/27/2012 3:49:22 PM)
Playing as the Central powers I have seen the Ruhr flattened. This needs to be fixed.

warspite1 -> RE: Strategic bombing overrated? (12/27/2012 4:15:05 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: parusski Playing as the Central powers I have seen the Ruhr flattened. This needs to be fixed. warspite1 They sowed the wind, now they will reap the whirlwind.... Er...30-years too soon [;)].

ulver -> RE: Strategic bombing overrated? (12/27/2012 4:36:08 PM)
In the future you may referee to me as Ulver”Balloon Bomber” Nielsen. [:D] On a more serious note I don’t think it needs to be removed, just dramatically toned down. Also fighters needs to be much better at defending bombing targets

warspite1 -> RE: Strategic bombing overrated? (12/27/2012 4:57:33 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ulver In the future you may referee to me as Ulver”Balloon Bomber” Nielsen. [:D] On a more serious note I don’t think it needs to be removed, just dramatically toned down. Also fighters needs to be much better at defending bombing targets warspite1 [:)]

parusski -> RE: Strategic bombing overrated? (12/27/2012 7:13:59 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: warspite1 quote: ORIGINAL: parusski Playing as the Central powers I have seen the Ruhr flattened. This needs to be fixed. warspite1 They sowed the wind, now they will reap the whirlwind.... Er...30-years too soon [;)]. Har hardee har har...WHO said that??

warspite1 -> RE: Strategic bombing overrated? (12/27/2012 7:17:21 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: parusski quote: ORIGINAL: warspite1 quote: ORIGINAL: parusski Playing as the Central powers I have seen the Ruhr flattened. This needs to be fixed. warspite1 They sowed the wind, now they will reap the whirlwind.... Er...30-years too soon [;)]. Har hardee har har...WHO said that?? warspite1 See post 7 - it was Ulver's grandad Ulver "Balloon Bomber" Nielsen .. or maybe his dad Ulver "Bomber" Nielsen or ... or maybe his son Ulver "Smart Bomber" Neilsen

CarnageINC -> RE: Strategic bombing overrated? (12/28/2012 1:59:24 AM)
I'll throw in my support for this idea, they are all valid and would greatly improve the game IMO. [;)]

Page: [1]

Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.6875