Bullwinkle58 -> RE: floatation damage (1/21/2013 8:30:55 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: MuguNiner Well, my original thought was to disband the BB at MI to prevent sinking due to the high level of floatation damage. I don't have facilities there that would repair the damage, just some PT, float plane, and mine tenders. It is on its way to PH and the crew has reduced floatation damage to 61. They have an additional boiler online and are making turns for three hexs a day! The Capt will reward the crew at 20:00 hours with a showing of "Casablanca" on the mess deck! The ploy of disbanding at Midway would be to fix some or all system damage before proceeding to a shipyard where the major floatation can be addressed. Think of system damage vis a vis flaotation damage as broken pumps. Very often large combatants can fix a lot of minor floatation and some system damage while underway. I've seen twenty points of minor floatation be fixed on a BB while on a long transit to the yards. But system damage is very important if float damage is high. That would be the only real benefit of Midway, unless a mid- or late-war ARD were there which could take a BB in. The trade off is the BB is vulnerable to air attack while disbanded in a forward area.
|
|
|
|