(Full Version)

All Forums >> [General] >> General Discussion



Message


U2 -> (1/8/2003 11:09:15 PM)

GamesDomain:

"Overall, Hearts of Iron is a real disappointment. While Paradox had admirable goals in mind when they set about fashioning this remarkably detailed look at World War II, the company didn't take enough time to consider the playability of the end product. Simply grafting the socio-political scene of the early 20th Century on to the Europa Universalis engine does not make for a good game. Combine that with the fundamental instability of the program and you've got a game that -- regrettably, considering the amount of dedication that was put into it -- should be avoided."

Dan




OG_Gleep -> (1/9/2003 1:31:46 AM)

PC Gamer - 90%
CGW - 3.5 stars




max_h -> (1/9/2003 1:34:43 AM)

I remember quite well, when Eu2 or Eu1 came out that both games had quite low ratings... I dislike the policy of rushing a game, but I know they`ll fix it.




dpstafford -> (1/9/2003 1:36:44 AM)

[QUOTE]Originally posted by OG_Gleep
[B]PC Gamer - 90%
CGW - 3.5 stars [/B][/QUOTE]
Looks like PC Gamer's writer forgot to play the game before he reviewed it. I think I'll forget to subscribe to their rag.




Zakhal -> (1/9/2003 4:30:48 AM)

Talk about bad planning. What were they thinking when they started to program this game? HoI has many issues that could have been foreseen with good planning.




dpstafford -> (1/9/2003 4:37:23 AM)

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Zakhal
[B]HoI has many issues that could have been foreseen with good planning. [/B][/QUOTE]
A growing "consensus" seems to be that the plan to use the good but inappropriate EU engine was Issue #1. Further, had they made the game turn-based with fully supported PBEM, the AI lapses would be less show-stopping. And the whole damned project would have been less complicated.




ASHBERY76 -> (1/9/2003 5:56:02 AM)

http://www.avault.com/reviews/review_temp.asp?game=hoi
http://www.sgo.cc/reviews/hearts_of_iron/index.shtml




U2 -> (1/9/2003 6:05:31 AM)

Strategy Gaming online

"Solo play: 10 - an aggressive and challenging AI that uses every facet to attack, great event implementation, everything else aside: it’s really simply FUN."

LOL:D




Reiryc -> (1/9/2003 7:25:01 AM)

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Les the Sarge 9-1
[B]And the silence below this line is all the rebutal he will ever likely achieve.
____________________________________ [/B][/QUOTE]

But, since I received the 'rebuttal' from above the line....I am a happy camper. :p

Reiryc




Black Cat -> (1/11/2003 10:03:22 AM)

After about 100 hours of my life wasted on the puppy I will say this:

The Combat Model sucks.

The decision to use Real Time instead of Turn Based was Dumb.

The use of Tiles instead of Hexs was a Poor Choice.

You cannot port the EU II Engine to 1936 and expect Good Things.

The Tech Tree flow is too complex and Badly Thought Out.

The Game as sold is really a $49.00 Buggy Beta.

For a Game that purports to be a historical simulation of WW II it seems impossible to replicate many of the actual events, equipment and Tech. in the Historic Time Frame.

The Manual is next to Useless.

Yes, Paradox are Good with patches, they are also Slow with patches.

I will re-vist this in about 1 year, although I doubt with all Bugs crushed the basic Game will work as a realistic Grand Stratigic Sim of WW II.

2 1/2 Stars for Now.




OG_Gleep -> (1/11/2003 7:19:30 PM)

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Black Cat
[B]After about 100 hours of my life wasted on the puppy I will say this:[/B][/QUOTE]

The Combat Model sucks.

I agree with you 33%, or disagree with you 66%, your choice. Land and Air - I think the combat model worked fine. Given the interface in which combats are played out, I don't know of any better. I spent ALOT of time in the forums, and almost every complaint about the battles were coming from a serious lack of understanding on how the system worked. Once explained to them, why 10 divisions of elite troops were getting mashed by an inferior opponent, quality and quantity, we hardly heard from them again on that subject. The problem is that all 3 areas, Naval Land and Air, work exactly the same way, and that really hurts any type of Naval Combat. Each infantry division represents 15,000 men, each Air Squadron represents hundreds of planes, and each Naval unit represents 2 ships. It just dosen't make sense to have Naval units act like the other two, and I hope they address this, but doubt they can, since its pretty much how the game is coded.

The decision to use Real Time instead of Turn Based was Dumb.

The range of game speeds, and the ability to pause at will satisfied me. Don't think I could handle it as turn based.

The use of Tiles instead of Hexs was a Poor Choice.

Erm, each territory is a different size. Imagine what the map would look like if they would have used hexes.

You cannot port the EU II Engine to 1936 and expect Good Things.

Never played EU at all, so can't comment. A lot of people loved both games though.

The Tech Tree flow is too complex and Badly Thought Out.

Are you nuts? This is the best part of the game. Unless you played as the US, you had to seriously think about where you wanted your country to be at any given point in the Campaign. One of the great balancing acts of the entire game imho.

The Game as sold is really a $49.00 Buggy Beta.

Buggy dosen't nessisarily mean beta. I only had a few issues, and most were cleared up in the latest patch. The remaining few I was able to fix by going into the highly accesible save game files.

For a Game that purports to be a historical simulation of WW II it seems impossible to replicate many of the actual events, equipment and Tech. in the Historic Time Frame.

Its actually a fantasy game, based on history. If it played out like exactly like what happened, it wouldn't be any fun to play. That's the whole draw, you get to assume control of any country, and if skilled enough, conquer the whole world. I can see how you would be upset coming into it expecting a Grisby like experience.

The Manual is next to Useless.

No, people didn't read it, and then wondered why the game was "a buggy beta". I read and re-read the manual 5 times, most of the nessisary information is there. Its no gem mind you, but its got most of the information there that you need to understand the system. Its no strategy guide, but its printed and serves its purpose.

Yes, Paradox are Good with patches, they are also Slow with patches.

They were really fast pumping out the patches until all fatal bugs were squashed....or atleast most of them. Now they are concentrating on player feedback and gameplay changes.

I will re-vist this in about 1 year, although I doubt with all Bugs crushed the basic Game will work as a realistic Grand Stratigic Sim of WW II.

Curious...did you try either Boted HoI or Total War? Total War made the game much more enjoyable for me. It helped a lot of the AI issues I had with the game. Also, I ONLY played the 36'-48' scenario before I loaded Total War. Oh man, the 39' scenario is far more intense, especially with that mod.

By no means is HoI perfect, and for you I recognize that everything you said above is 100% true for you. But for anyone considering trying it, I urge you to give it a shot. Buy it from EB, so if you don't like it you can return it. It is an extremly complex game, so if your a FPS junkie, it might not be fore you. RTFM, ghost the forums, understand the system before you give up on it though. It might surprise you.


PS. Its 4:00 am - Leaving this one at the rough draft level.




Frank W. -> (1/11/2003 10:07:51 PM)

i think if they made the AI more competent and the user interface get´s some rework (the main flaws IMHO) it could be fun.

there are some things that disturb me with raw materials: as japan for example you will not run out of oil, if you have captured china, because you can always trade coal or steel for rubber or oil on a 1:3 rate, which makes this whole system useless. not a REAL reason f. japan to capture the philipines as in reality.

the sea war needs of course rework and if you have fighters stationed in a province near the attacked one they should intercept the enemy planes if set on "intercept" or something if they have the proper range like in WIR it is modelled, too..

i think with patch 1.3 or 1.4 we will get a good game, not a historical WW2 game, but still a fun game i think.

i forgot to say it shoulb be possible, if you play great britain, that the assets of canada,s.africa and australia are at your command as in reality and not every country stands alone.

and: italy need a major rewortk, to strong in the beginning...




Les_the_Sarge_9_1 -> (1/11/2003 10:12:51 PM)

HoI teaches everyone a very valuable lesson.

Don't trust the box, don't trust the forums, don't trust anything anyone says. Including me as far as anyone who doesn't like this post will advise.

But then I am not out 50 bucks US and pissed off, you on the other hand might be out 50 bucks US and not to impressed.

Flash is just flash, and just because it is sold as a wargame has nothing to do with what it will actually be.

And that folks is the facts.

The worst I am going to suffer, is yet another dumb post by Reiryc explaining how my not buying the game means I am magically incapable of commenting on this game.

Which is comically when you realise that Reiryc doesn't own the game either, but is somehow able to say his points are magically valid.

Think about it, Reiryc wants you to spend 50 bucks US just so you can join the majority opinion and be pissed off, and I am saying keep your 50 bucks US and check out a game everyone (and I mean everyone) likes.

Reiryc will refute my saying that the majority is in favour of saying the game sucks, but then Reiryc is in the habit of refuting everything I say. He will insist on me dragging in here every forum thread I have ever read. I frankly havent the time.

So take my opinion or his, but all you guys that insist on choosing Reiryc, please stop filling the forums up with complaints about the game AFTER choosing his view and THEN buying the game.




Spooky -> (1/11/2003 10:59:30 PM)

In spite of all its flaws, HOI has a HUGE advantage over UV : you can mod it really very easily !

After only a few weeks, we already have 2 great WWII mods : Bolt's mod and The Federalist's mod ... and people are looking for "cold war" mod or even WWI mod.

If Paradox can manage to solve the current HOI flaws (AI, ....), I believe this game could really become a great game.

So to all the disappointed people : just wait 3 months and then come back to see if it has been improved and if some of the mods interest you.




Reiryc -> (1/11/2003 11:09:22 PM)

quote:

And that folks is the facts.


No, that's just your opinion....

quote:

The worst I am going to suffer, is yet another dumb post by Reiryc explaining how my not buying the game means I am magically incapable of commenting on this game.


Dumb post? If you want a dumb post, read your own sometime...

quote:

Which is comically when you realise that Reiryc doesn't own the game either, but is somehow able to say his points are magically valid.


Well you see les...since I've made no comment on the game, I've made no points about the game. Is it really that hard to grasp? I don't own game, I haven't played a demo (one doesnt exist), and I haven't commented on how good/bad the game is.

quote:

Think about it, Reiryc wants you to spend 50 bucks US just so you can join the majority opinion and be pissed off, and I am saying keep your 50 bucks US and check out a game everyone (and I mean everyone) likes.


Think about this...Reiryc doesn't nor has ever said you should spend 50 bucks on the game. Reiryc has only said, if you don't own the game, then don't go off half-cocked about a game extolling its negatives when you've never played it! IF you want to say that so-and-so says the game is bad, then more power to you! BUT, don't try to pass things off as if YOU'VE got personal experience with the game and it's terrible.

Is it really that hard to comprehend?

quote:

Reiryc will refute my saying that the majority is in favour of saying the game sucks, but then Reiryc is in the habit of refuting everything I say.


It appears to me, then most people refute what you say les...maybe that should give you some pause. ;) I doubt it though, d'amn the torpedos and full speed ahead, right?

Curmudgeon...

Reiryc




Les_the_Sarge_9_1 -> (1/11/2003 11:46:34 PM)

Interesting Reiryc says he has never commented on the game...but refuting me IS commenting on the game.

And it is interesting, how he likes to paint me as saying I have the game through the sin of omission, or eluding to having had past direct experience through implication.

I have not got the game people. Is that plain enough Reiryc.

Stayed tuned as Reiryc once again explains how wrong I am.




Reiryc -> (1/11/2003 11:59:22 PM)

quote:

Interesting Reiryc says he has never commented on the game...but refuting me IS commenting on the game.


No it is not....

I am commenting on your ability to judge the game as if you've played it. That is NOT commenting on the game itself.

quote:

And it is interesting, how he likes to paint me as saying I have the game through the sin of omission, or eluding to having had past direct experience through implication.


I've never painted you as having the game. You've made it clear in a number of posts on a number of forums that you do not own that game. You then go on to post your opinion on how bad the game is without even trying it for yourself, as if you did own the game.

You must be clueless to think that I am under the impression you have the game. My basis has been from the start that you don't have the game so you need to stop commenting on the gameplay as if you do! :eek: I think it's time for your medication les... ;)

Curmudgeon!

Reiryc




Terp -> (1/12/2003 10:18:32 AM)

Played Hearts of Iron many games and it is definately worth every cent I paid.... and more .... a very good game, has some flaws, but with the latest patches and more patches forthcoming well worth any wargamers time....

I would say buy to anyone who asked.....

My 2 cents ..... :)

Terp




ASHBERY76 -> (1/13/2003 10:22:24 AM)

Yes and the next patch is going to be huge step foward ,trust me.;)




OG_Gleep -> (1/14/2003 1:06:00 PM)

Well, being able to conquer candada should be enough incentive for both of you two to get the game. On that fine afternoon, when I clicked "Annex Nation"......I sent my Gestopo to stop the seed that would become Celine Deion (I know, her family isn't from Canada...but its my game dammit and if I say I 86'ed her grandparents, I 86'ed her grandparents).


I think the problem people are having with it, is that they are expecting a totally different experience. One guy came on this very forum, scoffing at how un-Uncommon Valor like the Naval system was, and that it wasen't equal to his gronard sense of perfection.




Von Rom -> (1/21/2003 6:49:50 AM)

A guy called The Federalist has made a Germany-only Mod for HoI for the 1939 scenario. It's playable as Germany only. He's made it so the German player has a much better challenge. And apparently he found a way to add the Afrika Korps to North Africa. So the rich oil fields of the Middle East are now within reach.

Since the next patch won't be out for a couple of months, the game may be playable again.

Lots of new events too.


Download it here:

http://roadtowar.com/


You can comment on the mod here:

http://www.europa-universalis.com/forum/showthread.php?s=&threadid=64593&perpage=25&pagenumber=3




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
1.03125