Japanese Player Wanted [Closed]

Japanese Player Wanted [Closed] (Full Version)

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Opponents Wanted

Message

Sangeli -> Japanese Player Wanted [Closed] (3/5/2013 9:22:00 PM)
I'm looking for an experienced Japanese player to face me in RA with stacking mod but I can be convinced to try another scenario. In game rules: 1 Day turns. Allied Damage Control = Yes Player Def. Upgrades = Yes Historical First Turn = Yes December 7th Surprise = Yes Reliable USN Torpedoes = No Realistic R&D = Yes No Unit Withdrawals = No House Rules: Must pay PP to move restricted units across borders No gamey air unit resize using carriers No strategic bombing in or out of China and no attacking Chinese air bases unless air units are detected Strait of Malacca at Singapore is closed to all Japanese surface ship when it is held by the Allies and vice versa later on. No Allied 4E bombing below 6,000 feet except by Naval squadrons My last attempt at a new game was unhinged by miscommunication with turn 1 rules so I'm just going to say historical turn 1 and let's go from there. PM, reply, or email me at stephencefali@gmail.com if you're interested.

walkerd -> RE: Japanese Player Wanted (3/6/2013 3:08:23 AM)
Message sent

Sangeli -> RE: Japanese Player Wanted (3/6/2013 4:44:26 AM)
Just to clarify I'm looking for someone with multiplayer experience as Japan in AE. So I'm going to pass on your offer walkered.

tigercub -> RE: Japanese Player Wanted (3/13/2013 3:35:43 PM)
OK i am putting my hand up...i have been thinking about 2 day turns..

Sangeli -> RE: Japanese Player Wanted (3/13/2013 6:01:19 PM)
I would much prefer one day turns.

tigercub -> RE: Japanese Player Wanted (3/14/2013 4:45:44 AM)
scenario 2 for me In game rules: 1 Day turns. Allied Damage Control = Yes Player Def. Upgrades = Yes Historical First Turn = No December 7th Surprise = Yes Reliable USN Torpedoes = No Realistic R&D = Yes No Unit Withdrawals = No House Rules: Must pay PP to move restricted units across borders No gamey air unit resize using carriers No strategic bombing in or out of China and no attacking Chinese air bases unless air units are detected Strait of Malacca at Singapore is closed to all Japanese surface ship when it is held by the Allies and vice versa later on. No 4 ENG nav bombing under 10,000ft No gamey tactics full stop.. if u use skype happy to have a chat ...vonblast

Sangeli -> RE: Japanese Player Wanted (3/14/2013 8:04:55 PM)
Edit: Playing with Tigercub did not pan out.

Sangeli -> RE: Japanese Player Wanted (3/26/2013 11:54:40 PM)
Thread reopened

kevin_hx -> RE: Japanese Player Wanted (3/27/2013 1:19:51 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sangeli Edit: Playing with Tigercub did not pan out. sorry sir, I wonder why not?

Sangeli -> RE: Japanese Player Wanted (3/27/2013 1:35:11 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: kevin_hx quote: ORIGINAL: Sangeli Edit: Playing with Tigercub did not pan out. sorry sir, I wonder why not? Miscommunication of turn 1 rules. I had some float and patrol planes in the PI with naval attack orders.

kevin_hx -> RE: Japanese Player Wanted (3/27/2013 2:16:32 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sangeli quote: ORIGINAL: kevin_hx quote: ORIGINAL: Sangeli Edit: Playing with Tigercub did not pan out. sorry sir, I wonder why not? Miscommunication of turn 1 rules. I had some float and patrol planes in the PI with naval attack orders. I see. so, if you change to play as japanese side, I can play with you and HRs are negotiated.

Sangeli -> RE: Japanese Player Wanted (3/27/2013 3:04:35 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: kevin_hx I see. so, if you change to play as japanese side, I can play with you and HRs are negotiated. Nah, I'm going to stick with the Allies. Maybe one day when I get bored as an AFB I'll switch but for now I'm going to stay on the side where I can manage my pilots instead of economy.

kevin_hx -> RE: Japanese Player Wanted (3/27/2013 6:14:03 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sangeli quote: ORIGINAL: kevin_hx I see. so, if you change to play as japanese side, I can play with you and HRs are negotiated. Nah, I'm going to stick with the Allies. Maybe one day when I get bored as an AFB I'll switch but for now I'm going to stay on the side where I can manage my pilots instead of economy. Never mind, I am waiting for it anytime. :)

castor troy -> RE: Japanese Player Wanted (3/27/2013 8:55:53 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sangeli quote: ORIGINAL: kevin_hx quote: ORIGINAL: Sangeli Edit: Playing with Tigercub did not pan out. sorry sir, I wonder why not? Miscommunication of turn 1 rules. I had some float and patrol planes in the PI with naval attack orders. you both took all the work to get the campaign starting and you guys quit because there were a couple of float planes on nav attack? [X(]

obvert -> RE: Japanese Player Wanted (3/27/2013 8:43:26 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: castor troy quote: ORIGINAL: Sangeli quote: ORIGINAL: kevin_hx quote: ORIGINAL: Sangeli Edit: Playing with Tigercub did not pan out. sorry sir, I wonder why not? Miscommunication of turn 1 rules. I had some float and patrol planes in the PI with naval attack orders. you both took all the work to get the campaign starting and you guys quit because there were a couple of float planes on nav attack? [X(] Those Seagulls are pretty feisty![:D]

Sangeli -> RE: Japanese Player Wanted (3/29/2013 3:45:35 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: castor troy you both took all the work to get the campaign starting and you guys quit because there were a couple of float planes on nav attack? [X(] You're going to have to talk to Tigercub about that one.

Page: [1]

Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.359375