Poll! Spam Can with a gun or Kat?! (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Steel Panthers World At War & Mega Campaigns



Message


Goblin -> Poll! Spam Can with a gun or Kat?! (12/30/2002 5:23:43 AM)

Which whoops a$$, takes names, and has a mean streak?!


Goblin




M4Jess -> (12/30/2002 5:39:19 AM)

CopY- KATZ!

but thats okay..we shall see




M4Jess -> (12/30/2002 5:39:58 AM)

before you vote..look at these...

1-




M4Jess -> (12/30/2002 5:40:18 AM)

2-




M4Jess -> (12/30/2002 5:40:39 AM)

3-




M4Jess -> (12/30/2002 5:41:00 AM)

4-




M4Jess -> (12/30/2002 5:41:20 AM)

5-




M4Jess -> (12/30/2002 5:41:38 AM)

6-




Goblin -> (12/30/2002 5:41:52 AM)

Wow. That proves the Allies had airplanes...

You know an M4 did not do any of that.

Goblin




M4Jess -> (12/30/2002 5:41:55 AM)

7-




M4Jess -> (12/30/2002 5:42:37 AM)

9-




M4Jess -> (12/30/2002 5:42:53 AM)

10-




M4Jess -> (12/30/2002 5:43:15 AM)

11-




M4Jess -> (12/30/2002 5:43:41 AM)

12-




M4Jess -> (12/30/2002 5:44:11 AM)

8-
opps




Goblin -> (12/30/2002 5:44:49 AM)

Where is 8 and 9?

I love to see Allied air at work!

Goblin:p




M4Jess -> (12/30/2002 5:45:11 AM)

13-




M4Jess -> (12/30/2002 5:45:51 AM)

14- COME TO THE GREEN SIDE HAWK...COME TO THE GREEN SIDE.....




M4Jess -> (12/30/2002 5:49:57 AM)

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Goblin
[B]Where is 8 and 9?

I love to see Allied air at work!

Goblin:p [/B][/QUOTE]

does it matter??a dead Kat is a dead Kat




Supervisor -> (12/30/2002 5:53:07 AM)

I hate to say it but German armor was superior to the Allied, the only problem was poor supply lines and the inability to produce enough to keep pace with the Allies numbers. They were outnumber at leat 10-1, when it came to the Tigers and King Tigers.




M4Jess -> (12/30/2002 6:01:56 AM)

G-man??

G-man??

:( :( :( :( :(

I must kill you now...

:( :( :( :( :(




Supervisor -> (12/30/2002 7:07:28 AM)

Sorry Jess, I love Shermans (especially Jumbos) but if I had a choice in even numbers I would have to take Kats. They just performed superior. I know I'm opening myslef for an a$$ kicking but the truth is told.;)




Don Doom -> (12/30/2002 7:34:57 AM)

[QUOTE]Originally posted by M4 Jess
[B]13- [/B][/QUOTE]

This one was from the Lenngrad front of russia, had nothing to do with shermans!:p :p :p




Don Doom -> It figures (12/30/2002 9:40:55 AM)

He has to use non-M4 destroyed panzer photo's to get his point across!:p




Jacc -> (12/30/2002 2:36:36 PM)

[QUOTE]M4 Jess is trying to...
[B]OMG ZERG RUSH!!!![/B][/QUOTE]

Play Starcraft, you sissy! Ronson < even the PzKpfw IIIm :D




wulfir -> hehe.. (12/30/2002 5:59:06 PM)

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Don Doom
[B]This one was from the Lenngrad front of russia, had nothing to do with shermans!:p :p :p [/B][/QUOTE]

Maybe, just maybe, the Russians sneaked one of their lend lease M4s into Leningrad - just in case some Big Game would show up..

:)




Goblin -> (12/31/2002 6:51:39 AM)

Jess, oh Jess, lookit the vote here!!!

Goblin




M4Jess -> (12/31/2002 6:57:39 AM)

6 to 8! T34s are built on Christys (sp) design...an American! and the votes are not all in yet!

and I feel fine taking Russian steel under my wing! AND by the way..you know I fight Russians all the time..so :p



[SIZE=4][COLOR=red]MAN! I HAVE TO KILL YOU AND BIRDASSMAN SISSYS SO BAD! ILL TAKE 50% M4s AND 50% RUSSIAN! [/COLOR] [/SIZE] :mad: :mad: :mad:

dang sissys wont even fight....




M4Jess -> (12/31/2002 7:01:25 AM)

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Jacc
[B]Play Starcraft, you sissy! Ronson < even the PzKpfw IIIm :D [/B][/QUOTE]

The Zerg are wussies..Ill take PROTOSS!:mad: :mad: :mad:




Goblin -> (12/31/2002 7:04:41 AM)

Hmmm. I see you attempting to wiggle out from under your loyalty to M4's by grabbing the Russian tanks. It's about what I expected. Orzel said "no, he will stay loyal to his M4's!', but I knew the vote, and game, would go against you if you did...

:rolleyes:

Goblin- A Goblin understands...




Page: [1] 2   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
1.671997