ErissN6 -> RE: UI Text (in particular tutorial) (12/16/2017 3:31:46 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Ronald Wendt The formation indicators (II, III, etc.) get very tiny and are not removed in a certain zoom. The naturally limited space in the complete zoom out is something we can do nothing about. Sure; what I wanted is to keep seeing the indicators well in the 3D option (the nato counter desappear in a 3Dfigure before I could see this nato formation well); and maybe even in Nato option (I don't remember) to not be compelled to zoom in to see tose indicators, because I lose too much strategical vision. Again, I repeat that a major problem too about these indicators is that they hide in the circle arround units (at least in the tutorial), maybe because they have same color. quote:
The formation indicators get hidden if many units are crowded in on place. Strength symbols have priority in this case which makes sense. Yes I felt strenght would be an indicator, but it will be false once units have been damaged, with too damaged X unit becoming smaller than a III unit. But, if these indicators are really just 'indicators', then it should be said in the tutorial, because I stopped there. In the tutorial it says differences of formations were very important, but I could barely see them, so I quit. If formations are not so important, it should be said that strenght can take its place as an indicator. Again, it reminds me with Ageod, with an awfull old RUS tutorial which text was very irritating because it was saying false (a fan even heavy insulted me for saying this). So I remade the tutorial texts and devs integered it in a patch. Then I was in RusGold beta and was in charge of the adaptation of its tutorial texts. quote:
we might be able to improve the contrast though, so that for the cases when the formation indicator is not hidden, it has a better readability. This is noted and we will see what we can do about and post any progress on this here. Thanks for reporting. Yeah contrast change may be good. Thanks too.
|
|
|
|