RE: Attenuation of HE fire

RE: Attenuation of HE fire (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> John Tiller's Campaign Series

Message

LoneWulf63 -> RE: Attenuation of HE fire (8/15/2013 3:00:19 AM)
Ah, no nukes and believe me I will do tests to see what the results of any modifications I make. If they don't work, I won't release them. If I do, I might release them. Too bad there is no possibility for a new WW II platoon level game. CB

junk2drive -> RE: Attenuation of HE fire (8/15/2013 3:14:28 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: resinslinger Too bad there is no possibility for a new WW II platoon level game. CB Who said that?

bde4soldier223 -> RE: Attenuation of HE fire (8/15/2013 3:24:26 AM)
if i ever learn how to do computer game programming.....i would like to make a platoon level game from world war 1 to present and updated with new weapons as they come out.

LoneWulf63 -> RE: Attenuation of HE fire (8/15/2013 4:15:05 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: junk2drive quote: ORIGINAL: resinslinger Too bad there is no possibility for a new WW II platoon level game. CB Who said that? Clarification. Too bad Matrix is going to do a new WW II platoon level game.

junk2drive -> RE: Attenuation of HE fire (8/15/2013 4:39:12 AM)
What you said was quote: However, I feel that a new game based on platoon-level actions is in order and not necessarily more advanced but less abstract. What I said was my opinion, that I don't foresee Matrix making that game. I don't have any insider information. Just another guy in a forum.

LoneWulf63 -> RE: Attenuation of HE fire (8/15/2013 8:16:54 PM)
I have decided that it would be better if I designed new units and just leave the artillery as it is. No use fixing something if it isn't broken. Of course, I won't be doing any design work on new units until after my wife and I have moved. CB

wodin -> RE: Attenuation of HE fire (9/7/2013 6:56:34 PM)
I've just come back to the game..bought WF and the first EF when they first came out. I never realised arty damage was dependent on distance until reading it yesterday. Makes no sense at all to me and if some released a mod to change it I'd use it.

TAIL GUNNER -> RE: Attenuation of HE fire (9/7/2013 7:31:46 PM)
The game is, and always has been far too "bloody" to begin with...anything that increases artillery firepower will only make it that much worse.

wodin -> RE: Attenuation of HE fire (9/7/2013 9:38:07 PM)
Doesn't need to be increased...maybe just find one damage number for each arty piece that works well and use that, that could mean overall damage would be lessened.

MrRoadrunner -> RE: Attenuation of HE fire (9/9/2013 11:23:24 AM)
Or, simply leave what works alone? Just sayin'. [;)] RR

LoneWulf63 -> RE: Attenuation of HE fire (9/9/2013 5:02:45 PM)
After finding a very good article on the REAL effects of artillery fire, I recanted what I said about attenuation of indirect fire. So, RR is right. Leave what works alone, and yes, if range was not a factor the results of indirect fire would make the game far too bloody. In essence, what I am restating is that I will not be modifying the present factors for indirect or direct HE fire. CB

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.6875