Losses? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series



Message

The Guru -> Losses? (10/8/2013 5:41:55 PM)

I warmly welcome the new patch, and applaud the developpers' team for listening to the community and adressing issues whose unsatisfactory treatment was a matter of widespread consensus.
I may be mistaken, but I believe another issue that seems to be quite frequently mentionned is the winner's side losses, and the retreat losses/ combat losses ratio (which is more appropriate to mediaeval or napoleonic warfare).

Any chance that that would be reassessed?



morvael -> RE: Losses? (10/8/2013 6:01:11 PM)

I think this is addressed by the new game. I don't think 2by3 would allow changing such balance-critical aspect of the game at this stage, as it could trigger a need to retune manpower and other resources production or an army would risk vanishing mid-game.

Of course, personally, I agree that lion's share of losses in this engine are retreat losses and this makes late war Soviet vs German battles a 1:1 exchange, which is unrealistic in my opinion.



rmonical -> RE: Losses? (10/9/2013 12:59:13 AM)

I'm still trying to get my head around the 400K Hiwis in the 42-45 scenario. That implies 5 million POWS. Does anybody ever get 5 million POWS?



Walloc -> RE: Losses? (10/9/2013 10:47:13 AM)

U dont only get hiwi's from POW's u get them from owning russian Manpower points too from 1942 IIRC.



Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
0.609375