RE: OH-58 Data Base Error?

RE: OH-58 Data Base Error? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios

Message

Boagrius -> RE: OH-58 Data Base Error? (11/15/2021 10:44:12 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Blast33 <type>UPDATE</type> <summary>Generic IR camera sees F-35 at a very high distance.</summary> <detail> The SA-22 Pantsir has a Generic IR camera attached to the system. The IR camera still sees a F-35 from more than 100Nm from behind (cruise setting). And around 51 Nm in frontal aspect. Compared to the data in the evidence link (which IR camera is in the same class) these figures are exponentially higher than the graphics. </detail> <evidence> https://twitter.com/gunner_schmulke/status/1459327066739036168 </evidence> I believe this is currently being worked on as part of a broader effort regarding IR-based VLO. The game doesn't really model it in its current form. https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=5017039

Blast33 -> RE: OH-58 Data Base Error? (11/16/2021 8:33:04 PM)
Thank you, you spotted it already, good!

14yellow14 -> RE: OH-58 Data Base Error? (11/19/2021 9:28:41 AM)
<type>UPDATE</type> <summary>Su-35S L-Band Wing Radar it's not a radar</summary> <detail> Su-35S L-Band Wing Radar (sensor_5714) is too powerful (even more than ground-based L-Band radars xD) and it's a mistake, that antenna on the Su-35 works more like IFF or ESM than anything else. I think it's not a radar. Same with the Su-57. quote: The Su-57 is also said to incorporate L-band radar arrays blended inside its large maneuvering leading edge extensions. These radars are more for target discrimination and identification than anything else. This has been previously discussed on the forum: https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4373897 I think it's the Type 4283 IFF: [image]https://i.imgur.com/kQXGS6F.jpg[/image] [image]https://i.imgur.com/B0PogJy.png[/image] quote: ON-BOARD MULTIFUNCTIONAL DIGITAL INTERROGATOR WITH ACTIVE PHASED ANTENNA GRILLE (AFAR) </detail> <evidence> https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4373897 https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/20434/no-the-su-57-isnt-junk-six-features-we-like-on-russias-new-fighter https://www.key.aero/article/sukhoi-su-35-ultimate-flanker </evidence> Thanks! :)

Fido81 -> RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? (11/20/2021 1:43:53 AM)
<type>ADD</type> <summary>PL-19/A-235 "Nudol" Direct Ascent ASAT/ABM System</summary> <detail> 2 missiles/TEL (road-mobile) Immobile radar (perhaps the radar should not be included with the unit and should be a separate unit) Max target altitude at least 485 km (demonstrated 11/2021), may be as high as 1000 km Max target range 200-1500 km Max interception velocity Mach 10 2 stage solid motor Rear-aspect ASAT profile (minimizes relative velocity at intercept) Anti-HGV capability Conventional or kinetic warhead </detail> <evidence> https://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/russia/a-235-asat.htm https://swfound.org/media/207162/swf_global_counterspace_capabilities_2021.pdf pg 2-15 https://swfound.org/media/207181/swf_russian_da-asat_fact_sheet_apr2021.pdf https://spacenews.com/russia-destroys-satellite-in-asat-test/ https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2021/11/russia-anti-satellite-missile-debris/ https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/43140/russian-anti-satellite-test-produces-dangerous-debris-cloud-in-orbit-reports http://militaryrussia.ru/blog/topic-806.html </evidence>

14yellow14 -> RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? (11/20/2021 9:33:16 AM)
<type>UPDATE</type> <summary>The F-35C Block 4 (aircraft_4874) ESM system is wrong, the AN/ASQ-239 Barracuda is missing.</summary> <detail> The F-35C Block 4 ESM system is wrong, the AN/ASQ-239 Barracuda is missing. The ESM system seems to have been replaced by the Band 2/5 ESM Reciever (just RWR) sensor and has lost capabilities. Actually in Block 4 (from Lot 17 onwards) the EW Barracuda system gets more apertures in Bands 2 (UHF/VHF) and 5 (above Ku-band) and this new sensor should complement the existing Barracuda by simply adding ESM (not just RWR) capability in those bands. With this upgrade and more processing power it is supposed to be able to intercept early warning radar signals such as Nebo M (VHF) and even LPI radars. AN/ASQ-239 Barracuda is an EW suite including ESM, RWR, OECM and DECM (at least in the frontal arc with the APG-81). The same applies to the other F-35 versions in Block 4. </detail> <evidence> https://twitter.com/alexgarcialonso/status/1461441028817362959 https://twitter.com/MIL_STD/status/1392470186477953031 https://twitter.com/TheDEWLine/status/1210215579065421825 https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/systems/an-asq-239.htm </evidence> Thanks! :)

CV60 -> RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? (11/21/2021 5:49:51 PM)
I'm posting this at the request of "Stanley_The_Rolmate", who is a new member, and is having trouble posting. This post refers to CWDB, not the DB3K database: All US CA's and CAG's seem to have way too high fuel consumption values. This means they have about 13-19 hours endurance at cruise speed. Below are the units and their fuel consumption. They all have 40 tons of oil fuel. Creep: 44,55kg per minute Cruise: 49,5kg per minute Full: 94,04kg per minute Flank 185,62kg per minute All versions of CA Rochester All versions of CA Macon All versions of CA Toledo All versions of CA Des Moines All versions of CA Los Angeles All Versions of CA Newport News CA Boston CA Saint Paul All versions of CA Helena Creep: 30,72kg per minute Cruise: 34,13kg per minute Full: 64,86kg per minute Flank: 128,01kg per minute All versions of CA and CAG Canbrerra All versions of CAG and CAG Boston In comparison CG Albany which is a conversion of a ship that's part of the same class as the CA Rochester, Has the following fuel consumption values(also carries 40 tons of oil fuel): Creep: 0,9kg per minute Cruise: 1kg per minute Full: 1,89kg per minute Flank: 3,75kg per minute [Note from CV 60]: Looking at these numbers, it appears "Stanley_The_Rolmate" is correct. Ship _1624 shows 40 tons of fuel. I'll try to dig around a bit and see what kind of numbers I can dig up for these cruisers, but the current fuel load is wrong.

14yellow14 -> RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? (11/21/2021 9:26:45 PM)
<type>Update</type> <summary>Rename AGM-88E AARGM ER (weapon_3588) to AGM-88G AARGM-ER</summary> <detail> Right now it is misnamed AGM-88E and is the G version. Also, it would be nice if they added the AARGM-ER based SIAW missile for the USAF F-35A (Block 4) From what is known initially it will be a missile based on the US Navy's AGM-88G, perhaps with a new warhead for a more varied target set. A more advanced missile will be developed later. quote: "SiAW is intended to "strike rapidly relocatable targets that create the anti-access/area denial environment..Targets include ballistic and cruise missile launchers, GPS jammers, anti-satellite systems and IADS. Initial fielding by the mid-2020s" quote: USAF's FY22 request states that the Navy's AARGM-ER based solution (with improved warhead) will be an interim capability for its Stand In Attack Weapon program. The Air Force has requested $166 Million for #SiAW in FY-22 and has indicated plans to compete the enduring solution. </detail> <evidence> https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/27022/air-force-to-turn-navy-air-defense-busting-missile-into-high-speed-critical-strike-weapon https://twitter.com/MIL_STD/status/1230893012013678592 https://twitter.com/MIL_STD/status/1403477008257007625 </evidence> Thanks! :)

Scorpion86 -> RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? (11/22/2021 12:43:53 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: CV60 I'm posting this at the request of "Stanley_The_Rolmate", who is a new member, and is having trouble posting. This post refers to CWDB, not the DB3K database: [...] Hey, could you post this in the CWDB thread too?

CV60 -> RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? (11/22/2021 1:02:25 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Scorpion86 quote: ORIGINAL: CV60 I'm posting this at the request of "Stanley_The_Rolmate", who is a new member, and is having trouble posting. This post refers to CWDB, not the DB3K database: [...] Hey, could you post this in the CWDB thread too? quote: quote: ORIGINAL: CV60 I'm posting this at the request of "Stanley_The_Rolmate", who is a new member, and is having trouble posting. This post refers to CWDB, not the DB3K database: [...] Hey, could you post this in the CWDB thread too? Where is the CWDB thread? I couldn't fine it, and it didn't show up in my search

KLAB -> RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? (11/22/2021 8:21:57 AM)
https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=3436158 it is the thread below this one?

KLAB -> RE: OH-58 Data Base Error? (11/22/2021 8:40:04 AM)
https://rg.ru/2021/11/22/reg-cfo/u-su-35-nashli-dva-dopolnitelnyh-radara-protiv-stesls-celej.html It may be something to do with terminology and translation but this article is unequivocal that it's three L band phased array "radars". K quote: ORIGINAL: 14yellow14 <type>UPDATE</type> <summary>Su-35S L-Band Wing Radar it's not a radar</summary> <detail> Su-35S L-Band Wing Radar (sensor_5714) is too powerful (even more than ground-based L-Band radars xD) and it's a mistake, that antenna on the Su-35 works more like IFF or ESM than anything else. I think it's not a radar. Same with the Su-57. quote: The Su-57 is also said to incorporate L-band radar arrays blended inside its large maneuvering leading edge extensions. These radars are more for target discrimination and identification than anything else. This has been previously discussed on the forum: https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4373897 I think it's the Type 4283 IFF: [image]https://i.imgur.com/kQXGS6F.jpg[/image] [image]https://i.imgur.com/B0PogJy.png[/image] quote: ON-BOARD MULTIFUNCTIONAL DIGITAL INTERROGATOR WITH ACTIVE PHASED ANTENNA GRILLE (AFAR) </detail> <evidence> https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4373897 https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/20434/no-the-su-57-isnt-junk-six-features-we-like-on-russias-new-fighter https://www.key.aero/article/sukhoi-su-35-ultimate-flanker </evidence> Thanks! :)

14yellow14 -> RE: OH-58 Data Base Error? (11/22/2021 12:31:37 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: KLAB https://rg.ru/2021/11/22/reg-cfo/u-su-35-nashli-dva-dopolnitelnyh-radara-protiv-stesls-celej.html It may be something to do with terminology and translation but this article is unequivocal that it's three L band phased array "radars". K Thanks. I've been doing some research and those claims of L-band anti-stealth radar functions are very dubious. An antenna can be AESA and have other functions, such as IFF or communications. It doesnt mean its a search radar. (THALES example https://www.edrmagazine.eu/thales-unveils-its-tsa-6000-aesa-flat-panel-iff) The article you quote appeared yesterday and seems to confuse the SU-35 IFF suite (4283MP) with the SU-57 (N036L-1-01). https://militarywatchmagazine.com/amp/article/su35-triple-radars-detect-stealth Most sources I have consulted refer to these antennas as IFF or EW (including ECM and maybe search in the case of the much powerful SU-57 suite). quote: The (SU-35S) Type 4283MP IFF interrogator has an active electronic scanning array (AESA) located along the wing leading edges. https://www.keymilitary.com/article/game-changing-flanker quote: The (SU-57) suite also has two N036L-1-01 L-band arrays on the wing's leading edge extensions that are not only used for friend-or-foe identification but also for electronic warfare purposes. Computer processing of the X- and L-band signals enable the systems information to be significantly enhanced. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Byelka_(radar) Other aircraft have the same type of antennas in the same position for EW or communications. https://img.militaryaerospace.com/files/base/ebm/mae/image/2016/07/th_0610mae_news04.png?auto=format&w=720 If it had a search function, an L-band radar needs to be huge to be able to track VLO targets at a certain distance and what these aircraft have are very small antennas. In any case these sensors are incorrectly modelled in the game, it is not possible for an antenna with just a dozen modules on a fighter to have as much search power as a dedicated ground radar like the NEBO M L-BAND. Right now a Su-35S can detect VLO targets like the F-35 at the same distance as a dedicated L-band radar like the NEBO M... [image]https://i.imgur.com/Vq8GGBp.jpg[/image] Cheers :)

KLAB -> RE: OH-58 Data Base Error? (11/22/2021 1:18:49 PM)
For what its worth I think there is definitely something being lost in translation as I have found examples of translations which refer to "electro optical radar" meaning something like the OLS-35 electro optical sensor with a built in track and scan function etc, clearly not a radar in any sense of the English meaning of "radar" but only in the sense of a device which detects things from a distance (not using the human eye).

Scorpion86 -> RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? (11/22/2021 9:26:28 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: CV60 quote: ORIGINAL: Scorpion86 Hey, could you post this in the CWDB thread too? Where is the CWDB thread? I couldn't fine it, and it didn't show up in my search quote: ORIGINAL: KLAB https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=3436158 it is the thread below this one? CV60, it's the exact thread KLAB linked to! There you can request addition and ammends to the CWDB!

CV60 -> RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? (11/22/2021 11:18:51 PM)
quote: CV60, it's the exact thread KLAB linked to! There you can request addition and ammends to the CWDB! Thanks. I interpreted the title to mean requested additions to the database, not additions and corrections

KLAB -> RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? (11/23/2021 10:12:39 AM)
<type>ADD</type> <summary>Single Survivor life Raft [2m] Generic Military</summary> <detail>Nice to have would be a single survivor life raft. (I have not been able to find one with DB search so if it exists apologies?) Noticed when working on some CSAR scenarios the smallest crew life raft has two people in it. Would be nice to have the ship equivalent of the facility #2046 - Stranded Personnel (1x) (Generic - 0) As a downed aircrew it would be nice to have one crew member and perhaps give it have some form of secure comms - emergency radio which most military aircrew would have? Long term aim being that there would be comms DF? The script is in its infancy but I am working towards getting the number of life rafts/survivors to match the crew size of the downed aircraft with a variable on survivors from aircraft by type. At the moment if a single seat fighter gets shot down the life raft has two people in it. In the longer term depending on my dubious LUA skills I am looking to limit the number of personnel the SAR/CSAR helo can pick up as I noticed they do not seem to ever run out of space, so my 412 rescue helo had about thirty people on board at one point! As ever just an idea and for consideration. K </detail> <evidence>That one person ejects the life raft would only have one person in it [:D]</evidence>

BDukes -> RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? (11/23/2021 7:21:13 PM)
<type>UPDATE</type> <summary>Add additional Mk-13 loadouts to #418 Tejas</summary> <detail> More photos have become available with operational loadouts. Noticing more Archers than Pythons lately. That is probably the standard AAM.</detail> 1)Heavy 6 Mk-13 1000lb bombs, 2 Archers, 1 725kg drop tank 2)Long range 2 Mk-13, 3 725kg drop tanks, 2 Archers, 1 Lightening Pod 3)Standard 4 Mk-13, 2 725Kg drop tanks, 2 Archers, 1 Lightening Pod </detail> <evidence> https://twitter.com/warplane_porn/status/1456656937504890887 https://thebharatmilitaryreview.blogspot.com/2013/12/indian-light-combat-aircraft-lca-tejas.html https://defenceforumindia.com/threads/lca-tejas-mk1-mk1a-news-and-discussion.81401/page-213#lg=attachment49623&slide=0 https://twitter.com/JaidevJamwal/status/1402898829851054080/photo/1 https://thebharatmilitaryreview.blogspot.com/2012/10/indian-air-forces-lca-light-combat.html </evidence>

BDukes -> RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues (11/23/2021 8:58:29 PM)
<type>Update</type> <summary>Russian SA-13 [9K-35 Strela-10] Updated with 9M333 Missile. New unit referred to as SA-13M</summary> <detail>Russian SA-13's have been updated with a more capable missile called the 9M3333. This has been requested in the past so first are that. Additional info added. Check out the last link too. Describes the differences in launchers and missile tech.</detail> <evidence> http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/fb.asp?m=4930514 http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/fb.asp?m=4931373 https://www.janes.com/defence-news/news-detail/russian-forces-receive-9m333-sams https://rostec.ru/news/kalashnikov-vypolnil-goz-po-postavke-minoborony-rf-zenitnykh-raket/ https://en.topwar.ru/178528-zenitnaja-raketa-9m333-buduschee-dlja-zrk-strela-10.html https://www.defenseworld.net/news/12987/Russia_Offers_To_Upgrade_India_s_Strela_Missile_System#.YZ1jgNDMJhE https://www.airrecognition.com/index.php/news/defense-aviation-news/2021/november/7884-kalashnikov-delivers-latest-missiles-for-strela-air-defense-system-to-russian-troops.html </evidence>

BDukes -> RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues (11/23/2021 9:09:13 PM)
<type>Add</type> <summary>Add Algerian Mig-29M2 2021 x14</summary> <detail>Pictures and movies of Algerian Mig-29M2 taken so probably a good add. Loadouts similar to Egypt's.</detail> <evidence> https://twitter.com/warplane_porn/status/1458529374873997324 https://twitter.com/RealAirPower1/status/1359203797613092871 https://www.scramble.nl/military-news/first-mig-29m-m2-fighter-aircraft-delivered-to-algeria https://www.scramble.nl/military-news/brand-new-algerian-mig-29m2 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cJf347CsE04 </evidence>

BDukes -> RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues (11/23/2021 9:38:02 PM)
<type>Add</type> <summary>ADD Swedish LVS-103[Patriot PAC-3 MSE]SAM x4 2021</summary> <detail>Swedish PAC-3 MSE Batteries are now in service.</detail> <evidence> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1NoXkZwWEis&t=3s https://www.armyrecognition.com/defense_news_november_2021_global_security_army_industry/sweden_officially_introduces_us_patriot_pac-3_mse_air_defense_missile_system_into_service.html https://www.dsca.mil/press-media/major-arms-sales/sweden-patriot-configuration-3-modernized-fire-units https://www.army-technology.com/news/sweden-acquires-patriot-defence-missile-system/ </evidence>

BDukes -> RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues (11/23/2021 10:30:44 PM)
<type>Update</type> <summary>Add out of service date of 2020 to Fort Grange/Rosalie class #1604</summary> <detail>Out of service last year and sold to Egypt this year.</detail> <evidence> https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2021/10/uk-sells-two-fort-rosalie-class-replenishment-ships-to-egypt/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fort_Rosalie-class_replenishment_ship https://www.janes.com/defence-news/news-detail/egypt-buys-second-hand-fleet-support-ships-from-uk </evidence>

BDukes -> RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues (11/23/2021 10:47:35 PM)
<type>Update</type> <summary>Update #4623 Name from EA-03 to WZ-7</summary> <detail>There are a number of these in active service now. Looks like first recon missions were 2018-2019.</detail> <evidence> https://twitter.com/RupprechtDeino/status/1458495283139162116 https://twitter.com/wenluomo/status/1458541687488200706 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WZ-7 https://www.armyrecognition.com/defense_news_november_2021_global_security_army_industry/new_largest_chinese-made_hale_combat_drone_wz-7_soar_dragon_enters_into_service.html </evidence>

BDukes -> RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues (11/23/2021 11:01:57 PM)
<type>Add</type> <summary>Add CM-802B Missile [YJ-83KB]</summary> <detail>There is a new version of missile that has integrated active radar/passive IIR dual mode seeker. Benefit is one missile can do both land and sea strike. Note air and sea launched variants. Looks like PLAN JH-7a is the initial carrier.</detail> <evidence> https://twitter.com/RupprechtDeino/status/1448213167876841479 https://twitter.com/stoa1984/status/1453750132592287751/photo/1 https://twitter.com/Defence_IDA/status/1442703214672027649 https://twitter.com/Defence_IDA/status/1442703214672027649 </evidence>

tylerblakebrandon -> RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues (11/24/2021 3:13:58 PM)
<type>Add</type> <summary>Romeo SSB Conversion</summary> <detail>Recent North Korean conversion of an existing Romeo SS to an SSB. Conversion includes lengthening the sail to accommodate 3 Pukguksong-3 or Pukguksong-4 SLBM's at the cost of endurance from a reduced battery compartment. </detail> <evidence> http://www.hisutton.com/ROMEO-Mod_Submarine.html http://www.hisutton.com/Korean-KSS-III-And-ROMEO-Mod-Class-Submarines.html http://www.hisutton.com/North-Korea-Pukguksong-SLBM.html?fbclid=IwAR2NU-5eLsOY1_pbjzV7NcjLjphJLO5iy_4ow5k8Q1ul2Qer16T1swb90vw https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2020/10/unusual-submarine-likely-to-increase-threat-from-north-korea/?fbclid=IwAR1nEPgptctI_YQ9jh_jZ_KnQuDv7PfA6blmXElj45o-dlEjYE20FGvsgnI https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2021/10/north-korea-fires-possible-pukguksong-ballistic-missile/ https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/29122/north-koreas-new-ballistic-missile-submarine-is-a-refurbished-antique https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/42803/north-korea-tests-pint-sized-submarine-launched-ballistic-missile </evidence>

tylerblakebrandon -> RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues (11/24/2021 3:50:53 PM)
<type>Update</type> <summary>Update SLBM armament for Indian Arihant SSBN</summary> <detail>Public Sources indicate the 12 K-15 SLBM or 4 K-4 SLBM, propose to add the new weapons to the DB3K and update SSBN armament from the current Agni III</detail> <evidence> http://www.hisutton.com/Vanquisher%20of%20Enemies%20-%20INS%20Arihant.html http://www.hisutton.com/Revealed%20-%20INS%20Arihant%20SSBN.html https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2021/05/5-years-of-submarine-secrecy-indias-unique-arihant-class-is-still-in-hiding/?fbclid=IwAR1T2n2-QEjRH-M-cLzhBF-gNiapoH1Zl7cl8DZG3aUQVvSDhYDSHS4dN8c http://www.military-today.com/navy/arihant_class.htm https://warontherocks.com/2019/01/angles-and-dangles-arihant-and-the-dilemma-of-indias-undersea-nuclear-weapons/ https://www.naval-technology.com/projects/arihant-class/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K-4_(missile) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sagarika_(missile) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arihant-class_submarine https://www.naval-technology.com/news/newsindian-navys-k-15-slbm-successfully-completes-development-trials/ http://www.ipcs.org/comm_select.php?articleNo=3870 https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2020-03/news/india-tests-submarine-launched-missile https://thediplomat.com/tag/k-15-submarine-launched-ballistic-missiles/ https://thediplomat.com/tag/k-4-slbm/ https://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/india/k-4.htm </evidence>

14yellow14 -> RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues (11/26/2021 9:30:24 AM)
<type>Update</type> <summary>96L6 radar is operating in the wrong radar band</summary> <detail> The 96L6 Cheese Board radar operates in C-band (G only?) but is currently modelled as an S-band (E) radar. quote: This is flanked by a 96L6E (NATO reporting name Cheese Board) C-band (5.25GHz to 5.925GHz) early warning and target acquisition radar with a range of up to 162nm (300km). This affects both the individual facility and the sensors of the S-400 batteries. Of the S-400 system, the radar that operates in S-band is the Big Bird D radar (F band). [image]https://i.imgur.com/gLHFNtF.png[/image] [image]https://i.imgur.com/JloEnKA.png[/image] </detail> <evidence> https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/96l6.htm https://www.radartutorial.eu/19.kartei/02.surv/karte044.en.html https://i.imgur.com/gLHFNtF.png https://www.armadainternational.com/2021/08/turkey-antiradar-missile/ </evidence> Thanks! :)

14yellow14 -> RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues (11/28/2021 9:38:34 PM)
<type>Update</type> <summary>Norway's F-35A (aircraft_3326) loadout with external JSM should be able to carry 4 missiles externally (6 total)</summary> <detail> Currently it only carries 2 externally and loses total capacity. [image]https://i2.wp.com/theaviationist.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/F-35-RNoAF.jpg[/image] [image]https://www.secretprojects.co.uk/data/attachments/139/139364-699853bce1f315ac352cd548962051fe.jpg[/image] </detail> <evidence> https://theaviationist.com/2013/05/13/two-jsm-f35/ https://www.secretprojects.co.uk/data/attachments/139/139364-699853bce1f315ac352cd548962051fe.jpg </evidence> Thanks!

lumiere -> RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues (11/29/2021 2:50:52 PM)
(DB3K v491) Sorry if sub had any modification IRL, but Kamehameha (Submarine #96) is missing "Benjamin Franklin" magazines for torpedo reload.

FifthDomain -> RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? (12/2/2021 10:01:33 PM)
Could I request the XQ-222 Valkyrie be capable of launch from carriers please it will launch from LHA but not CVN, thanks.

KLAB -> RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? (12/4/2021 3:51:01 AM)
<type>UPDATE</type> <summary> UAE F-35 - Not happening Rafale F4 is. </summary> <detail> UAE has bought 80 Rafale instead. Request/Suggest either 1. Overwrite UAE F-35 DB entry with Dassault Rafale F4. 2. Change entry for F35 to hypothetical. 3. Update title to show order cancelled. 4. Deletion. But suspect will cause issues. </detail> <evidence> https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20211203-uae-signs-deal-for-80-french-rafale-fighter-jets-officials </evidence> Thanks K

Page: << < prev 239 240 [241] 242 243 next > >>

Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.953125