RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests (Full Version)

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios



Message

.Sirius -> RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests (9/9/2015 7:26:02 PM)

Hi Thanks noted
quote:

ORIGINAL: ExNusquam

I'm working on what's going to become a multi-day scenario and noticed that most of the US's conventional carriers lack the ability to replenish their escorts. The only DB entry I've seen that has it is the USS Ranger 1975. At the very least, all the post-WWII carriers should be able to refuel to starboard.

Midway Class (x2 out both sides): http://www.navsource.org/archives/05/0587533.jpg
Forrestal Class (hard to ID the ship but navsource lists it as USS Ranger) (x2 Starboard): http://www.navsource.org/archives/05/pix2/0583831.jpg
Kitty Hawk Class (looks like x2 Starboard): http://www.navsource.org/archives/05/0597528.jpg





Kushan04 -> RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests (9/11/2015 8:43:52 PM)

Starting some preliminary work on a 1940s GUIK scenario. Would it be possible to add the Soviet Project 7 [aka Gnevny or Gremyashchiy] class destroyer?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gnevny-class_destroyer



Schr75 -> RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests (9/11/2015 10:06:21 PM)

Hi Paul

The notes regarding V1.09 says that the fuel issue with the YF-12 have been corrected.
Either I´m missing something or they haven´t.

The YF-12 is still guzzling fuel at a rate of almost 3000kg/m @Mach3 and 90K feet.
The SR-71 is only using 373kg/m, and they are essentially the same planes.[image][/image]

Hope you have the time to correct this.
I would love to play around with the YF-12, but ATM it´s range is something like 170nm.

Søren

[image]local://upfiles/49421/CFCBC89F1DB74DB6B4468451AE763B61.jpg[/image]



e2204588 -> RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests (9/20/2015 12:04:47 PM)

Following bombs can not attack runway
RAF 250lb LDGP
RAF 500lb LDGP
M57 250lb GPB
M64 500lb GPB

But following bombs can attack runway
Mk81 250lb LDGP
Mk82 500lb LDGP

Which one is correct behavior?



e2204588 -> RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests (9/20/2015 12:13:20 PM)

In CWDB v440, 406mm/50 Nuke Salvo can not attack runway.





Warrior33 -> RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests (10/1/2015 3:55:36 PM)

**This would have been posted 7 days ago but the forum anti-spam settings blocked it for no good reason.

Part 1 - bug report

I think there may be a bug in CWDB 439.

The following WW2 era subs appear to be using the electric motor profile instead of the diesel motor profile when surfaced / zero depth. (I had the DB filtered and sorted chronologically to view USN WWW2 submarines.) I tested the following subs:

SS 285 Balao (1942-54)
SS 482 Fleet Snorkle (1946)
USS Sealion (1946-1960)
GUPPY Class (1948-1957, Radar Picket)
SS 214 Gato-class (1941-54)

When I got to the SS 572 Sailfish, the diesels flank speed worked correctly when surfaced. I did not check any subs after the Sailfish.

The diesel motor altitude and speed settings may be incorrect in the DB.

-----

Part 2 - request

This is not a complete list but I would like to request some additional platforms for the CWDB (in service circa 1944 - Leyte Gulf):

USN platforms
Sangamon-class CVE
Casablanca-class CVE
F6F-3
TBM-1C
TBF-1C
FM-2

IJN platforms
Kamikaze aircraft
*CVL Zuiho
*CVL Chitose
*CVL Chiyoda
Yamato-class BB
Nagato-class BB
Fuso-class BB
*BBCV (hybrid) ISE & HYUGA
Myoko-class CA
Takao-class CA
Mogami-class CA
Agano-class CA
Kuma-class CL
*CL Oyodo (only one ship in class)
Shimakaze-class DD
Yugumo-class DD
Akizuki-class DD
Matsu-class DD
Hatsuharu-class DD
Fubuki-class (Type II) DD



Chris21wen -> RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests (10/4/2015 2:55:49 PM)

The image you have for INS Khukri isn't correct. This is the correct image.

[image]local://upfiles/5388/5D3B913AF94C431F98D2F8F81B99BD7D.jpg[/image]



mikmykWS -> RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests (10/4/2015 6:38:09 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chris H

The image you have for INS Khukri isn't correct. This is the correct image.

[image]local://upfiles/5388/5D3B913AF94C431F98D2F8F81B99BD7D.jpg[/image]


A Community group handles that.

You can remote image issues here

http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=3441939

Mike



Schr75 -> RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests (10/5/2015 4:17:23 PM)

Hi Sirius

Reading a thread in the tech support forum I stumbled on a DB error.

In CWDB v.440 the UGM-27 Polaris missile carries the same payload in all three variant (3xW58 200kt).

In reality it was as follows:

The A1 variant carried 1xW47 Y1 600kt RV.
The A2 variant carried 1xW47 Y2 1,2mt RV.
The A3 variant carried 3xW58 200kt MRV.

http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Usa/Weapons/Allbombs.html
http://missilethreat.com/missiles/umg-27-polaris-a-1-2-3/

Søren



.Sirius -> RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests (10/5/2015 9:01:51 PM)

Noted
quote:

ORIGINAL: Schr75

Hi Sirius

Reading a thread in the tech support forum I stumbled on a DB error.

In CWDB v.440 the UGM-27 Polaris missile carries the same payload in all three variant (3xW58 200kt).

In reality it was as follows:

The A1 variant carried 1xW47 Y1 600kt RV.
The A2 variant carried 1xW47 Y2 1,2mt RV.
The A3 variant carried 3xW58 200kt MRV.

http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Usa/Weapons/Allbombs.html
http://missilethreat.com/missiles/umg-27-polaris-a-1-2-3/

Søren





Mgellis -> RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests (10/7/2015 8:12:29 PM)

Brainstorming some alternate history/what if the Nazis held out until 1946 or 1947/smuggled some equipment out to neo-Nazi groups in South America ideas. What might show up? These aircraft jumped out as possibilities...thanks for considering them! (Information from Wikipedia)


Focke-Wulf Fw 190
General characteristics
Operational dates: 1941-

Crew: 1
Length: 9.00 m (29 ft 5 in)
Wingspan: 10.51 m (34 ft 5 in)
Height: 3.95 m (12 ft 12 in)
Wing area: 18.30 m² (196.99 ft²)
Empty weight: 3,200 kg (7,060 lb)
Loaded weight: 4,417 kg (9,735 lb)
Max. takeoff weight: 4,900 kg (10,800 lb)
Powerplant: 1 × BMW 801 D-2 radial engine, 1,250 kW (1,700 PS)

Performance

Maximum speed: 656 km/h (408 mph) at 19,420 ft (5,920 m)
Range: 800 km (500 mi)
Service ceiling: 11,410 m (37,430 ft)
Rate of climb: 15 m/s (2,953 ft/min)
Wing loading: 241 kg/m² (49.4 lb/ft²)
Power/mass: 0.29-0.33 kW/kg (0.18-0.21 hp/lb)

Armament

Guns:
2 × 13 mm (.51 in) synchronized MG 131 machine guns with 475 rpg
4 × 20 mm MG 151/20 E cannon with 250 rpg, synchronized in the wing roots and 140 rpg free-firing outboard in mid-wing mounts.


Messerschmitt Me 262
General characteristics
Operational dates: 1944-
Crew: 1
Length: 10.60 m (34 ft 9 in)
Wingspan: 12.60 m (41 ft 6 in)
Height: 3.50 m (11 ft 6 in)
Wing area: 21.7 m² (234 ft²)
Empty weight: 3,795 kg[100] (8,366 lb)
Loaded weight: 6,473 kg[100] (14,272 lb)
Max. takeoff weight: 7,130 kg[100] (15,720 lb)
Powerplant: 2 × Junkers Jumo 004 B-1 turbojets, 8.8 kN (1,980 lbf) each
Aspect ratio: 7.32

Performance

Maximum speed: 900 km/h (559 mph)
Range: 1,050 km (652 mi)
Service ceiling: 11,450 m (37,565 ft)
Rate of climb: 1,200 m/min (At max weight of 7,130 kg) (3,900 ft/min)
Thrust/weight: 0.28

Armament

Guns: 4 × 30 mm MK 108 cannon (A-2a: two cannon)
Rockets: 24 × 55 mm (2.2 in) R4M rockets
Bombs: 2 × 250 kg (550 lb) bombs or 2 × 500 kg (1,100 lb) bombs (A-2a variant)

Arado Ar 196 (commonly used seaplane)
General characteristics
Operational dates: 1938-
Crew: Two (pilot and observer)
Length: 11.0 m (36 ft 1 in)
Wingspan: 12.4 m (40 ft 0 in)
Height: 4.45 m (14 ft 7 in)
Wing area: 28.4 m² (306 ft²)
Empty weight: 2,990 kg (6,592 lb)
Max. takeoff weight: 3,720 kg (8,200 lb)
Powerplant: 1 × BMW 132K 9-cylinder radial engine, 960 PS (706 kW, 947 hp)

Performance

Maximum speed: 311 km/h (193 mph)
Range: 1,080 km (670 mi)
Service ceiling: 7,010 m (23,000 ft)
Rate of climb: 300 m/min (980 ft/min)
Wing loading: 98.2 kg/m² (20.1 lb/ft²)
Power/mass: 167 W/kg (0.101 hp/lb)

Armament

Guns:
1 × 7.92 mm (0.312 in) MG 15 machine gun
1 × 7.92 mm (0.312 in) MG 17 machine gun
2 × 20 mm MG FF cannons
Bombs: 2 × 50 kg (110 lb) bombs

Junkers Ju 52 <-- also used by Spain until 1952
General characteristics
Operational dates: 1932-

Crew: three (two pilots, radio operator)
Capacity: 18 troops or 12 litter patients (or 1,820 kg (4,000 lb) of freight)
Length: 18.90 m (62 ft 0 in)
Wingspan: 29.25 m (95 ft 10 in)
Height: 4.5 m (14 ft 10 in)
Wing area: 110.5 m² (1,190 ft²)
Empty weight: 6,510 kg (14,325 lb)
Loaded weight: 9,200 kg (20,270 lb)
Max. takeoff weight: 10,990 kg (24,200 lb)
Powerplant: 3 × BMW 132T radial engines, 533 kW (715 hp)[47] each

Performance

Maximum speed: 265 km/h (165 mph) at sea level
Cruise speed: 211 km/h (132 mph)
Range: 870 km (540 mi)
Service ceiling: 5,490 m (18,000 ft)
Rate of climb: 17 minutes to 3,050 m (10,000 ft)

Armament

Guns:
1 × 13 mm (.51 in) MG 131 machine gun in a dorsal position
2 × 7.92 mm (.312 in) MG 15 machine guns
Bombs: up to 500 kilograms (1,100 lb) of bombs (some variants)



Skjold -> RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests (10/20/2015 12:17:27 PM)

Swedish Name & Speeds Corrections:
  • C Gotland should have its speed lowered to 27,5 knots.
  • J 11 Visby (1966) should have its designation changed to F 11 Visby.
  • J 5 Goteborg (FF) should have its designation changed to F 7 Malmö.
  • J Mjolner Class should be renamed to J 29 Mode, which is it correct name. Mjölner is one of the ships within the Mode class.
  • K Mjolner should be renamed to F 76 Mode. Ditto as above
  • K 11 Ehrenskold should be renamed to F 71 Ehrenskold.
  • T 102 Plejad should have its speed increased to 37,5 knots.
  • K Romulus should have its typed changed to destroyer and it's designation should be J 27 Romulus

  • AB.204B ASW should not be in swedish service, the 204B was in service but as a transport and SAR chopper.
  • AT-16 Harvard should have designation Sk 16B.
  • Both the DC-3's should have designation Tp 79.
  • F-51D should have designation J 26.
  • Hkp 2 and Hkp 4 shouild lose their - between Hkp and number.
  • Mosquito should have designation J 30 and variant number should be XIX.
  • PBY-5 Catalina should have designation Tp 47.
  • Spitfire should be a photo recon plane, not a fighter. It's designation should be S 31 and model is XIX.
  • UH-1B should have designation Hkp 3A.
  • Vampire Mk. 1 should have designation J 28A
  • Vampire Mk. 50 should have designation J 28B

  • Centurion MBT should have the designation Strv 104.


    Thanks for making a nice DB! Skjold.



    • ExNusquam -> RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests (10/25/2015 2:41:32 AM)

    OK, so there's some minor, minor issues with the early model E-2 aircraft. Everything seems to work OK now, so this can go on the back burner.

    The E-2B:
    Currently it has the AN/APS-120, when in reality it had the AN/APS-96 (legacy from the A) with improved computing power/reliability. This is important, because the AN/APS-120 has surface search capability that was not present on the E-2B. In game, the AN/APS-120 is broken and does not have the surface search ability.

    The E-2C:
    The E-2C needs 2 entries, one dated 1972, the other 1977. The existing entry (1768) E-2C Hawkeye Basic, 1974 should be re-dated to 1977

    New Entry:
    E-2C Hawkeye Basic, 1972
    Replace AN/APS-125 with AN/APS-120. The AN/APS-120 should have surface search capability as well, but should maintain the early 1970s tech generation.
    Add AN/ALQ-61 ELINT (from E-2B, no evidence of it being removed)

    Source



    .Sirius -> RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests (10/25/2015 8:37:38 AM)

    All noted thanks
    quote:

    ORIGINAL: Skjold

    Swedish Name & Speeds Corrections:
  • C Gotland should have its speed lowered to 27,5 knots.
  • J 11 Visby (1966) should have its designation changed to F 11 Visby.
  • J 5 Goteborg (FF) should have its designation changed to F 7 Malmö.
  • J Mjolner Class should be renamed to J 29 Mode, which is it correct name. Mjölner is one of the ships within the Mode class.
  • K Mjolner should be renamed to F 76 Mode. Ditto as above
  • K 11 Ehrenskold should be renamed to F 71 Ehrenskold.
  • T 102 Plejad should have its speed increased to 37,5 knots.
  • K Romulus should have its typed changed to destroyer and it's designation should be J 27 Romulus

  • AB.204B ASW should not be in swedish service, the 204B was in service but as a transport and SAR chopper.
  • AT-16 Harvard should have designation Sk 16B.
  • Both the DC-3's should have designation Tp 79.
  • F-51D should have designation J 26.
  • Hkp 2 and Hkp 4 shouild lose their - between Hkp and number.
  • Mosquito should have designation J 30 and variant number should be XIX.
  • PBY-5 Catalina should have designation Tp 47.
  • Spitfire should be a photo recon plane, not a fighter. It's designation should be S 31 and model is XIX.
  • UH-1B should have designation Hkp 3A.
  • Vampire Mk. 1 should have designation J 28A
  • Vampire Mk. 50 should have designation J 28B

  • Centurion MBT should have the designation Strv 104.


    Thanks for making a nice DB! Skjold.




    • Skjold -> RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests (10/28/2015 4:23:38 PM)

    Thanks Sirius!

    If at all possible, could the A-32A lansen (both #2742 and #742) get their bombs? I ofcourse don't want every payload, thats ludacris but it would be nice to have the 8x 120 kg bombs, 4x 250 kg bombs and 2x 600 kg bomb OR the 2x 1000 lb bomb payloads. Also as you can see the current rocket payloads doesn't make sense either. No low caliber rockets are used and the 135 mm rockets should be 16 instead of 12 and designation m/56 instead of m/70. Also the A 32A without the radar should not be able to fire the RB 04E since it would have no way to guide it and it should have 2 RB 04E's instead of 3. "Balk GV, GH; heavy pylon for the RB04C/D ASM could only be mounted on L4 and R4. H and V meaning Left(Vänster) or Right(Höger) version of the pylon"

    Making a mission with heavy use of them thats why i am asking.

    If you're too busy, no worries.

    Sources:
    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a0/FVMF.002943.jpg (Giant Picture)
    [image]http://www.ipmsstockholm.se/home/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/A32A-normal.jpg[/image]
    [image]http://www.ipmsstockholm.se/home/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/A32-Bombs.jpg[/image]

    Small name correction i noticed while adding pictures to CWDB, #737 should be named A 29B. (J 29B was redesignated as A 29B when serving with attack units.)

    Cheers, Skjold.



    PN79 -> RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests (11/1/2015 2:03:20 PM)

    Hello,
    as I have just posted request for gun correction in L-39ZO (remove gun) and L-39ZA (add gun) in DB3000 database I am requesting this correction also in Cold War database.

    List:
    #2869 L-39ZO (Iraq) --- plese remove gun, photo: http://l-39.cz/_L-39/L-39_uzivatele/irak/L-39_irak_Bratislava.jpg

    Thank you in advance.



    Pancor -> RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests (11/8/2015 7:21:44 AM)

    Hello

    can you add the Fargo class cruiser

    Here are the specs:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fargo-class_cruiser
    http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ship/cl-106-specs.htm
    http://navysite.de/cl/cl106.htm

    Picture
    [image]http://www.navsource.org/archives/04/106/0410601.jpg[/image]

    Thanks



    .Sirius -> RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests (11/8/2015 8:28:31 AM)

    Noted thanks
    quote:

    ORIGINAL: Pancor

    Hello

    can you add the Fargo class cruiser

    Here are the specs:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fargo-class_cruiser
    http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ship/cl-106-specs.htm
    http://navysite.de/cl/cl106.htm

    Picture
    [image]http://www.navsource.org/archives/04/106/0410601.jpg[/image]

    Thanks




    .Sirius -> RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests (11/8/2015 8:29:20 AM)

    Noted Thanks
    quote:

    ORIGINAL: PN79

    Hello,
    as I have just posted request for gun correction in L-39ZO (remove gun) and L-39ZA (add gun) in DB3000 database I am requesting this correction also in Cold War database.

    List:
    #2869 L-39ZO (Iraq) --- plese remove gun, photo: http://l-39.cz/_L-39/L-39_uzivatele/irak/L-39_irak_Bratislava.jpg

    Thank you in advance.




    .Sirius -> RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests (11/8/2015 8:30:53 AM)

    Thanks for detailed infomation will update thanks
    quote:

    ORIGINAL: Skjold

    Thanks Sirius!

    If at all possible, could the A-32A lansen (both #2742 and #742) get their bombs? I ofcourse don't want every payload, thats ludacris but it would be nice to have the 8x 120 kg bombs, 4x 250 kg bombs and 2x 600 kg bomb OR the 2x 1000 lb bomb payloads. Also as you can see the current rocket payloads doesn't make sense either. No low caliber rockets are used and the 135 mm rockets should be 16 instead of 12 and designation m/56 instead of m/70. Also the A 32A without the radar should not be able to fire the RB 04E since it would have no way to guide it and it should have 2 RB 04E's instead of 3. "Balk GV, GH; heavy pylon for the RB04C/D ASM could only be mounted on L4 and R4. H and V meaning Left(Vänster) or Right(Höger) version of the pylon"

    Making a mission with heavy use of them thats why i am asking.

    If you're too busy, no worries.

    Sources:
    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a0/FVMF.002943.jpg (Giant Picture)
    [image]http://www.ipmsstockholm.se/home/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/A32A-normal.jpg[/image]
    [image]http://www.ipmsstockholm.se/home/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/A32-Bombs.jpg[/image]

    Small name correction i noticed while adding pictures to CWDB, #737 should be named A 29B. (J 29B was redesignated as A 29B when serving with attack units.)

    Cheers, Skjold.




    .Sirius -> RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests (11/8/2015 6:44:50 PM)

    Added
    quote:

    ORIGINAL: Kushan

    Starting some preliminary work on a 1940s GUIK scenario. Would it be possible to add the Soviet Project 7 [aka Gnevny or Gremyashchiy] class destroyer?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gnevny-class_destroyer




    .Sirius -> RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests (11/8/2015 6:52:11 PM)

    Updated
    quote:

    ORIGINAL: ExNusquam

    OK, so there's some minor, minor issues with the early model E-2 aircraft. Everything seems to work OK now, so this can go on the back burner.

    The E-2B:
    Currently it has the AN/APS-120, when in reality it had the AN/APS-96 (legacy from the A) with improved computing power/reliability. This is important, because the AN/APS-120 has surface search capability that was not present on the E-2B. In game, the AN/APS-120 is broken and does not have the surface search ability.

    The E-2C:
    The E-2C needs 2 entries, one dated 1972, the other 1977. The existing entry (1768) E-2C Hawkeye Basic, 1974 should be re-dated to 1977

    New Entry:
    E-2C Hawkeye Basic, 1972
    Replace AN/APS-125 with AN/APS-120. The AN/APS-120 should have surface search capability as well, but should maintain the early 1970s tech generation.
    Add AN/ALQ-61 ELINT (from E-2B, no evidence of it being removed)

    Source





    .Sirius -> RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests (11/8/2015 7:24:53 PM)

    Updated
    quote:

    ORIGINAL: .Sirius

    Thanks for detailed infomation will update thanks
    quote:

    ORIGINAL: Skjold

    Thanks Sirius!

    If at all possible, could the A-32A lansen (both #2742 and #742) get their bombs? I ofcourse don't want every payload, thats ludacris but it would be nice to have the 8x 120 kg bombs, 4x 250 kg bombs and 2x 600 kg bomb OR the 2x 1000 lb bomb payloads. Also as you can see the current rocket payloads doesn't make sense either. No low caliber rockets are used and the 135 mm rockets should be 16 instead of 12 and designation m/56 instead of m/70. Also the A 32A without the radar should not be able to fire the RB 04E since it would have no way to guide it and it should have 2 RB 04E's instead of 3. "Balk GV, GH; heavy pylon for the RB04C/D ASM could only be mounted on L4 and R4. H and V meaning Left(Vänster) or Right(Höger) version of the pylon"

    Making a mission with heavy use of them thats why i am asking.

    If you're too busy, no worries.

    Sources:
    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a0/FVMF.002943.jpg (Giant Picture)
    [image]http://www.ipmsstockholm.se/home/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/A32A-normal.jpg[/image]
    [image]http://www.ipmsstockholm.se/home/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/A32-Bombs.jpg[/image]

    Small name correction i noticed while adding pictures to CWDB, #737 should be named A 29B. (J 29B was redesignated as A 29B when serving with attack units.)

    Cheers, Skjold.






    .Sirius -> RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests (11/9/2015 12:47:31 PM)

    Hi guys,
    I've had a mountain of requests for WW2 Platforms which I am slowly adding and modifying platforms to the DB, be advised Command is not geared up for WW2 Conflicts etc lack of comms, fog of war , dog fighting etc so heres your warning.



    Broncepulido -> RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests (11/9/2015 1:36:49 PM)

    And the no implementation of armour ...



    Skjold -> RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests (11/10/2015 7:04:15 AM)

    Hi Sirius again, thanks for updating! Sorry for not including it in the A 32A lansen post above but i literally just got my hands on this book.

    Would be nice to have the RB 04C on the A 32A Lansen and the RB 04D on the AJ 37 / SH 37 Viggen. The Lansen currently carries the RB 04E which exclusivly was a AJ 37 / SH 37 Viggen armament.
    The differences are in command terms better range (D and E versions) a different radar guidance system (C and D uses CW radar, E uses an monopulse radar with frequensy hopping techn. The anti-jamming and accuracy was greatly increased on the E variant.

    RB 04C (1962) First ever? operational anti-ship missile in the western world. CW radar guidance. Shorter range then D/E (Not sure how much shorter, however shouldn't be any drastic change as the C was deemed long range. 15 nm perhaps?) The only one that served on A 32A Lansen.
    RB 04D (1968) Improved engine for longer range (same range as E). Used on AJ 37 and SH 37.
    RB 04E (1977) The one we already have in-game. Used on AJ 37 and SH 37.

    Source: ISBN 91-975467-1-2



    .Sirius -> RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests (11/10/2015 7:30:24 PM)

    No problem its on the to do list
    quote:

    ORIGINAL: Skjold

    Hi Sirius again, thanks for updating! Sorry for not including it in the A 32A lansen post above but i literally just got my hands on this book.

    Would be nice to have the RB 04C on the A 32A Lansen and the RB 04D on the AJ 37 / SH 37 Viggen. The Lansen currently carries the RB 04E which exclusivly was a AJ 37 / SH 37 Viggen armament.
    The differences are in command terms better range (D and E versions) a different radar guidance system (C and D uses CW radar, E uses an monopulse radar with frequensy hopping techn. The anti-jamming and accuracy was greatly increased on the E variant.

    RB 04C (1962) First ever? operational anti-ship missile in the western world. CW radar guidance. Shorter range then D/E (Not sure how much shorter, however shouldn't be any drastic change as the C was deemed long range. 15 nm perhaps?) The only one that served on A 32A Lansen.
    RB 04D (1968) Improved engine for longer range (same range as E). Used on AJ 37 and SH 37.
    RB 04E (1977) The one we already have in-game. Used on AJ 37 and SH 37.

    Source: ISBN 91-975467-1-2




    Ekaton -> RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests (11/14/2015 12:57:07 PM)

    [img]https://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/n4dxdkmupn9yq0fy6wor.jpg[/img]

    When creating scenario about the Korean War I've found out that there is no Commercial B377, arguably one of the most beautiful planes ever made. Also, IIRC the planes that Israel had were not the military Stratofreighters but converted Stratocruisers.

    There were some differences between B377 and C-97, such as the latter had heavier maximum takeoff weight and longer range.



    Pancor -> RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests (11/21/2015 6:40:15 AM)

    Hello

    it looks like the EM Ognevoy (#500) has some fault and the Ognevoy has two class the Ognevoy itself project 30 while the follow on ships were Project 30K

    the main gun is the B-2LM a variant of B-13 coastal gun not the 130mm/45 obr 1933
    specs main gun: http://www.navweaps.com/Weapons/WNRussian_51-50_m1936.htm
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B-2LM

    source:
    http://russianships.info/eng/warships/project_30k.htm
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ognevoy-class_destroyer
    http://www.navypedia.org/ships/russia/ru_dd_ognevoy.htm

    Thanks



    .Sirius -> RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests (11/24/2015 7:59:01 PM)

    No problems will amend
    quote:

    ORIGINAL: Pancor

    Hello

    it looks like the EM Ognevoy (#500) has some fault and the Ognevoy has two class the Ognevoy itself project 30 while the follow on ships were Project 30K

    the main gun is the B-2LM a variant of B-13 coastal gun not the 130mm/45 obr 1933
    specs main gun: http://www.navweaps.com/Weapons/WNRussian_51-50_m1936.htm
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B-2LM

    source:
    http://russianships.info/eng/warships/project_30k.htm
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ognevoy-class_destroyer
    http://www.navypedia.org/ships/russia/ru_dd_ognevoy.htm

    Thanks




    Page: <<   < prev  15 16 [17] 18 19   next >   >>

    Valid CSS!




    Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
    1.96875