RE: What gives SLAAK (Full Version)

All Forums >> [General] >> General Discussion



Message


Otto von Blotto -> RE: What gives SLAAK (10/20/2013 11:19:29 AM)

If you want to silence SLAAK just offer him a game of chess, I've never seen so many weasel excuses in one thread. [;)]




Chickenboy -> RE: What gives SLAAK (10/20/2013 2:08:15 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1
But the windbag is not here and you are acting all out of character and scarring the kids!


Scarring the kids? Perish the thought! A little scary, perhaps, to see an esteemed forum member act out an aneurism like this, but not scar-inducing.




Chickenboy -> RE: What gives SLAAK (10/20/2013 2:09:17 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: Gary Childress

Slaak, I'm ready for you! Did you misinterpret something I read one time?
warspite1

Okay. Did I misinterpret something you read? How would I do that? Do you mean something I wrote?



What gives with you pumping up your post count, Warspite1? I'd ordinarily say that you're above that sort of thing, but then I thought for a second. [:'(]




Chickenboy -> RE: What gives SLAAK (10/20/2013 2:10:24 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Gary Childress
Or, Terminus? Where is terminus? Is he here?


Check the THREAD in the WiTP:AE forum. That's the best place to fish for Danes, IMO.




Chickenboy -> RE: What gives SLAAK (10/20/2013 2:11:26 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1
Terminus? I suspect he's in Denmark.


Aye. Along with "something rotten" and Mel Gibson's Hamlet. [;)]




Chickenboy -> RE: What gives SLAAK (10/20/2013 2:14:14 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1
You don't know what the point of it was? I think it was largely game related - although he does like having digs at people too.


Spambottery royalty. Terminus is my guiding light in the post count quest. [&o]




Chickenboy -> RE: What gives SLAAK (10/20/2013 2:17:25 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1
You want the women SLAAK is promising? Good luck with that! [;)]


A word of advice, Gary? OK-two words. 1. Sleep! Go and get some. Warspite1 is correct here. 2. Pictures. If you get a woman that SLAAK promises you must post some. Also, make sure that she's a genotypical female too, will ya? SLAAK posts some curiously masculine types from time to time.




Chickenboy -> RE: What gives SLAAK (10/20/2013 2:22:43 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Gary Childress
Is anyone out there able to help me or are you all "lightweights?"


I think Warspite1 has given you some very solid advice, Gary. It's atypical for him to offer such sensible lines of action, but you should heed his word.

As a spambot from the Terminus' School of Spambottery, I've gotta say I'm impressed with this effort though. 300+ posts on a thread in a couple days? Most impressive! Well done! Now go and get some rest.

As for SLAAK-us old timers know that he spouts conspiracy nonsense ad nauseum. Unless you green button him that won't stop. Other than being a kook, he's relatively harmless, Gary.




warspite1 -> RE: What gives SLAAK (10/20/2013 2:23:17 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1
You don't know what the point of it was? I think it was largely game related - although he does like having digs at people too.


Spambottery royalty. Terminus is my guiding light in the post count quest. [&o]
warspite1

SLAAK was going to write:

"The point of it? £$%^ed if I know. As far as I can make out every post of his is a pointless waste of space - a bit like that Chickenboy and his verbal excreta. Now that splendid warspite chappy on he other hand, he is a wordsmith, a poet, a witty raconteur, a bon viveur par excellence, an Englishman whose every word (spoken or written) is a wonderous gem to behold". But it came out wrong [:D]




Chickenboy -> RE: What gives SLAAK (10/20/2013 2:24:15 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1
No - there is no crime in posting jibberish - otherwise 12,000 of my posts would see me landed in jail [:)].


Aye. The other 427 have redeemed you, however, being as they have scantily clad women in the "Australian Beauties" section. [8D]




Chickenboy -> RE: What gives SLAAK (10/20/2013 2:26:13 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1
If it is obvious that a person cannot be reasoned with then you have to walk away.


Is that why you never call or write any more? [:'(]




Chickenboy -> RE: What gives SLAAK (10/20/2013 2:31:08 PM)


[quote
How's that?
[/quote]

Pretty good, Boomer78! You left out the "false flags" bit, but otherwise pretty complete. [&o]




warspite1 -> RE: What gives SLAAK (10/20/2013 2:33:05 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1
If it is obvious that a person cannot be reasoned with then you have to walk away.


Is that why you never call or write any more? [:'(]
warspite1

No I don't call or write no more cos you stopped caring CB. I'm a one man woman - always was, always will be - but you hurt me real bad, I ain't never gonna forget.




Chickenboy -> RE: What gives SLAAK (10/20/2013 2:36:15 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1
Now that splendid warspite chappy on he other hand, he is a wordsmith, a poet, a witty raconteur, a bon viveur par excellence, an Englishman whose every word (spoken or written) is a wonderous gem to behold". But it came out wrong [:D]

Aye. He *was* going to write that. He shortened this noble thought by calling you a "dingbat" instead. Is that synonymous? [:'(]




Chickenboy -> RE: What gives SLAAK (10/20/2013 2:38:10 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1
If it is obvious that a person cannot be reasoned with then you have to walk away.


Is that why you never call or write any more? [:'(]
warspite1

No I don't call or write no more cos you stopped caring CB. I'm a one man woman - always was, always will be - but you hurt me real bad, I ain't never gonna forget.



Well, with all due respect...you make an ugly chick. Just sayin'.




Chickenboy -> RE: What gives SLAAK (10/20/2013 2:39:07 PM)

Hmmm...could it be that Gary is getting some needed rest? Let's hope!




warspite1 -> RE: What gives SLAAK (10/20/2013 2:41:08 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1
Now that splendid warspite chappy on he other hand, he is a wordsmith, a poet, a witty raconteur, a bon viveur par excellence, an Englishman whose every word (spoken or written) is a wonderous gem to behold". But it came out wrong [:D]

Aye. He *was* going to write that. He shortened this noble thought by calling you a "dingbat" instead. Is that synonymous? [:'(]
warspite1

synonymous? No a dingbat is:

an ornament or spacer used in typesetting, sometimes more formally known as a "printer's ornament"

Dingbat or dingbats might also refer to:

Dingbat, slang term, used to describe someone silly, notably applied to the TV character Edith Bunker by her husband
"Dingbats", a board game requiring players to solve rebuses and known in America as Whatzit?
dingbat, another word for rebus derived from the game
Dingbat (building), slang term, used to describe cheap urban apartment buildings from the 1950s and 1960s
Dingbat, in South Africa, a paddle ball
Dingbat, a character created by Paul Terry
"The Dingbat Family", a comic by George Herriman
Dingbat, a cartoon character who co-starred in Heathcliff and Dingbat
Dingbat, slang term, used as an alternate name for the Dignity Battalions




warspite1 -> RE: What gives SLAAK (10/20/2013 2:42:08 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

Hmmm...could it be that Gary is getting some needed rest? Let's hope!
warspite1

Yes, lets hope so [:(].




warspite1 -> RE: What gives SLAAK (10/20/2013 2:51:54 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Gary Childress

Neitzsche took a dive for Germany. Heidegger was wrong... Nothing good happened in 1930-40 Germany. Heidegger is dead.
warspite1

To be fairto Neitzsche [whoever he is] he wasn't the worst culprit. That Jurgen Klinsmann - he took a dive...or two...or three for Germany. But as he was a hero for Spurs I'll overlook that...unlike Neitzsche. Who did he play for anyway?




Chickenboy -> RE: What gives SLAAK (10/20/2013 2:53:59 PM)

Needcheese? Well, I don't really *need* it, but it's a nicety. A nice Stilton on a cracker? Cheddar on some eggs? Yes, very nice.




Chickenboy -> RE: What gives SLAAK (10/20/2013 3:12:00 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: Gary Childress

Neitzsche took a dive for Germany. Heidegger was wrong... Nothing good happened in 1930-40 Germany. Heidegger is dead.
warspite1

To be fairto Neitzsche [whoever he is] he wasn't the worst culprit. That Jurgen Klinsmann - he took a dive...or two...or three for Germany. But as he was a hero for Spurs I'll overlook that...unlike Neitzsche. Who did he play for anyway?



The Hammers. The Hammers was the name for which English soccer team?




vonRocko -> RE: What gives SLAAK (10/20/2013 3:12:58 PM)

What are you trying to prove? That you are more whacked then slaak? If so, you have succeeded.




Darkspire -> RE: What gives SLAAK (10/20/2013 3:15:09 PM)

Is it safe yet? Has he gone for his meds? [:D]

Darkspire




warspite1 -> RE: What gives SLAAK (10/20/2013 3:26:28 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: Gary Childress

Neitzsche took a dive for Germany. Heidegger was wrong... Nothing good happened in 1930-40 Germany. Heidegger is dead.
warspite1

To be fairto Neitzsche [whoever he is] he wasn't the worst culprit. That Jurgen Klinsmann - he took a dive...or two...or three for Germany. But as he was a hero for Spurs I'll overlook that...unlike Neitzsche. Who did he play for anyway?



The Hammers. The Hammers was the name for which English soccer team?
warspite1

West Ham United - also known as the Irons as they were formed by employees of the old Thames Ironworks & Shipbuilding Company.

So Nietzsche played for the Hammers did he? Wow, never knew that. He must have been rubbish though - West Ham did nothing until the 60's (apart from play - and lose - in the first Wembley FA Cup Final in 1923).




Aurelian -> RE: What gives SLAAK (10/20/2013 3:37:03 PM)

What the hell?




warspite1 -> RE: What gives SLAAK (10/20/2013 3:39:12 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aurelian

What the hell?
warspite1

To what are you referring Aurelian? Is it concern for Gary or incredulity that this Niedzsche guy played for rubbish West Ham?




Orm -> RE: What gives SLAAK (10/20/2013 3:53:07 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: Gary Childress

Neitzsche took a dive for Germany. Heidegger was wrong... Nothing good happened in 1930-40 Germany. Heidegger is dead.
warspite1

To be fairto Neitzsche [whoever he is] he wasn't the worst culprit. That Jurgen Klinsmann - he took a dive...or two...or three for Germany. But as he was a hero for Spurs I'll overlook that...unlike Neitzsche. Who did he play for anyway?



The Hammers. The Hammers was the name for which English soccer team?
warspite1

West Ham United - also known as the Irons as they were formed by employees of the old Thames Ironworks & Shipbuilding Company.

So Nietzsche played for the Hammers did he? Wow, never knew that. He must have been rubbish though - West Ham did nothing until the 60's (apart from play - and lose - in the first Wembley FA Cup Final in 1923).


One can be a good player in a bad team. Ian Rush, for example, was a good player that might have had great success in a stronger national team than Wales.




warspite1 -> RE: What gives SLAAK (10/20/2013 3:54:46 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1
You want the women SLAAK is promising? Good luck with that! [;)]


A word of advice, Gary? OK-two words. 1. Sleep! Go and get some. Warspite1 is correct here. 2. Pictures. If you get a woman that SLAAK promises you must post some. Also, make sure that she's a genotypical female too, will ya? SLAAK posts some curiously masculine types from time to time.
warspite1

Post #9 of the "Pirates Seeks Amazon Booty" thread is the perfect example of SLAAK's rather peculiar taste




warspite1 -> RE: What gives SLAAK (10/20/2013 3:55:24 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Orm


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: Gary Childress

Neitzsche took a dive for Germany. Heidegger was wrong... Nothing good happened in 1930-40 Germany. Heidegger is dead.
warspite1

To be fairto Neitzsche [whoever he is] he wasn't the worst culprit. That Jurgen Klinsmann - he took a dive...or two...or three for Germany. But as he was a hero for Spurs I'll overlook that...unlike Neitzsche. Who did he play for anyway?



The Hammers. The Hammers was the name for which English soccer team?
warspite1

West Ham United - also known as the Irons as they were formed by employees of the old Thames Ironworks & Shipbuilding Company.

So Nietzsche played for the Hammers did he? Wow, never knew that. He must have been rubbish though - West Ham did nothing until the 60's (apart from play - and lose - in the first Wembley FA Cup Final in 1923).


One can be a good player in a bad team. Ian Rush, for example, was a good player that might have had great success in a stronger national team than Wales.
warspite1

You are right as always Mr O [&o]




Aurelian -> RE: What gives SLAAK (10/20/2013 4:46:36 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aurelian

What the hell?
warspite1

To what are you referring Aurelian? Is it concern for Gary or incredulity that this Niedzsche guy played for rubbish West Ham?



Gary going postal. Don't know what started it.

Oh, this Niedzsche guy too.




Page: <<   < prev  9 10 [11] 12 13   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
2.734375