RE: Castles in the Sand - Spidery(J) vs MrKane(A) no MrKane please

RE: Castles in the Sand - Spidery(J) vs MrKane(A) no MrKane please (Full Version)

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports

Message

Spidery -> RE: Castles in the Sand - Spidery(J) vs MrKane(A) no MrKane please (4/17/2015 7:49:16 AM)
March 10th 1944 Liberators night bomb Miri. 12 oil wells lost. 3 J1N1-S, 1 Ki-46-III KAI, 1 Ki-84r traded for 3 Liberators. I-181 is damaged near Truk. The convoy attacked in the Bay of Bengal runs for Madras and air cover so is not attacked. Allies bombard Guam, minor damage only. Looks like a bombardment force heading for Balikpapan from Biak.

Spidery -> RE: Castles in the Sand - Spidery(J) vs MrKane(A) no MrKane please (4/18/2015 10:58:51 AM)
March 11th 1944 A day for firing blanks. Allied bombardment (?) force moving closer to Babeldoab. In the morning 20 B7A2 strike (as dive bombers, Navb skill 70+) attack the Fletchers and in the afternoon 12, no CAP, zero hits scored[:@], 6 planes lost. I need kamikazes! Fletchers bombard Rota, the camouflage works a treat and they do zero damage[;)]. Allies attack at Guam. It does not go well, for them[:)]: quote: Attacking force 27877 troops, 522 guns, 694 vehicles, Assault Value = 930 Defending force 30825 troops, 414 guns, 572 vehicles, Assault Value = 688 Allied adjusted assault: 195 Japanese adjusted defense: 3377 Allied assault odds: 1 to 17 (fort level 8) Combat modifiers Defender: terrain(+), forts(+), leaders(+), disruption(-) experience(-) Attacker: Japanese ground losses: 410 casualties reported Squads: 5 destroyed, 9 disabled Non Combat: 9 destroyed, 8 disabled Engineers: 1 destroyed, 2 disabled Vehicles lost 17 (3 destroyed, 14 disabled) Units destroyed 1 Allied ground losses: 2712 casualties reported Squads: 32 destroyed, 201 disabled Non Combat: 2 destroyed, 63 disabled Engineers: 10 destroyed, 41 disabled Guns lost 70 (3 destroyed, 67 disabled) Vehicles lost 87 (9 destroyed, 78 disabled) Looks like one of his infantry divisions took most of the damage. My destroyed unit was a tiny fragment of a Nav Gd unit lifted from Ponape. Not quite the result I hoped for but nearly 10% of his troops killed and no damage to the forts[8D]. Looks like I may have lost about 1000 supply in the defense so I'm likely to run out of supply in about a couple of months. Apart from two naval bombardments he made very little attempt to disrupt my troops. VP tally shows me picking up 25 VP points, that is 75 devices, so he may have taken more losses than is reported. No night strike at Miri. P-38J, F6F-3, Spitfire VIII sweep Miri and Brunei. 63 planes lost for 40 downed. A group of 9 PB4Y-1 also turn up and one of them is downed and one oil well knocked out. About 100 fuel transfer from Tarakan to Brunei. Last of the air mobile defenders from Samarinda are lifted from Melak. The remainder have a long walk through mountains and jungle to Miri and I am not expecting many to make it. They need to make another 130 km before they can even start to draw supply from Miri[8\|]. Allied convoy seems to be off-loading at Madras. Recon reports only 5 fighters there so I may risk a strike.

Spidery -> RE: Castles in the Sand - Spidery(J) vs MrKane(A) no MrKane please (4/19/2015 10:34:02 AM)
March 12th 1944 Lose a Manzyu TM Class TK off Miri to SS Sargo. Fortunately, she is inbound to Miri so no oil/fuel lost and I have a surfeit of tankers. Still it is 19 VP down the drain. A near miss on SS Pickerel off CRB starts a fire on the bridge. That must be nasty when you are under attack and can't surface. 5 DD hang around near Peleliu and are attacked by 12 B7A2, 5 planes lost, no hits scored[:@]. If he keeps leaving targets I will try again with D4Y4 and see if they can do better. Tanaka moved to intercept a raid, which never happened, and is spotted. Will move to safety to avoid the carriers from Guam. Allied BB bombard Tinian, little effect, and Guam, light damage to troops and some supply lost. Allies land at Rabaul, not too sure why he is bothering. The defenders have been without supply for a while so are in a poor state. If he destroys them it will free me up to rebuy/rebuild units. Allied bombardment attacks and bombing runs against troops in Burma. Corsairs and Lightnings sweep Miri. The day defense is too weak and they suffer. 38 planes lost for just 10 downed[:(]. I haven't been building enough fighters to handle losses. 2 weeks ago I had 317 N1K1-J in the pools, now I have 145. Two weeks ago I had 135 Ki-84r in the pool, now I am just using them as they come of the production lines. Have a lot of A6M5c and some Ki-43-IV available but I don't like using them at Miri where he can fly Thunderbolts and Corsairs. Some newly arriving groups have been given Ki-43-Ic and Ki-27b for training purposes. Current production (monthly): 185 Ki-84r, 121 Ki-43-IV, 157 N1K1-J, 110 A6M5c, 75 N1K2-J, 30 J2M2. Sometime in June or July I expect to get a boost to production as the Ki-83 starts being produced at 210 per month.

Spidery -> RE: Castles in the Sand - Spidery(J) vs MrKane(A) no MrKane please (4/20/2015 9:47:15 AM)
March 13th 1944 Liberators hit Miri at night. 2 A6M5d-S, 1 J1N1-S, 7 Ki-46-III KAI for 4 PB4Y-1 and no damage to oil is okay. Thunderbolts sweep Brunei. Hellcats sweep Tinian. 43 N1K1-J, 28 Ki-43-IV, 7 Ki-84r for 8 P-47D2, 7 F6F-3 - I can't afford these losses. Emilies and Nells kill themselves at night against DD at Babeldoab (7 Nell, 3 Emily lost). DD bombard Babeldoab, no damage to base, light damage and no planes destroyed, but morale takes a hit. RO-66 takes 36/71/3 damage near Truk. Ki-74-I to 1/45

Lowpe -> RE: Castles in the Sand - Spidery(J) vs MrKane(A) no MrKane please (4/20/2015 1:46:00 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Spidery March 12th 1944 Current production (monthly): 185 Ki-84r, 121 Ki-43-IV, 157 N1K1-J, 110 A6M5c, 75 N1K2-J, 30 J2M2. Sometime in June or July I expect to get a boost to production as the Ki-83 starts being produced at 210 per month. The Ki83 will definitely help, and boy are you producing a lot of them! Frank R production, looks low, but then again in June perhaps that won't be low with all those 83s coming online. My rough rule of thumb, from Pax Mondo, was about 100 twin engine fighters per month for the end game...scenario 1.

Spidery -> RE: Castles in the Sand - Spidery(J) vs MrKane(A) no MrKane please (4/20/2015 5:17:15 PM)
March 14th 1944 RO-66 is lost. Allies sweep Miri, Brunei and Saipan. At Brunei all planes have been grounded. 44 N1K1-J, 15 J2M2, 10 Ki-84r for 16 F4U-1A, 14 F4U-1, 11 F6F-3, 2 P-47D25 69::43 is okay. Allies bomb Lashio. Allied BB bombard Guam. SS Sawfish locates the KB lurking to the East of the Philippines (I was planning to strike at an attack into Northern DEI, etc.). Will now have to relocate to get away from sub threat. 3 separate DD attack the sub but only manage two minor hits. An Amphibious force spotted at Truk, may be loading the marine divisions? Looks like some oil may be flowing from Singapore to Port Arthur. At least the oil from Bengkalis seems to be making it there and had a small drop in oil at Singapore. I decide to expand N1K1-J and Ki-84r production by 30 each and N1K2-J by 10. That is 77,000 supply, or about 2 to 3 days worth. I hoped not to need this, if I had done this 3 months ago would have an extra 200 planes in pools. It is tricky to predict demand but it is worth it to expand as soon as possible. I can cover engine production by reducing Ki-67-Ia production until the N1K5-J or Ki-83 reduce the demand for the Nakajima Ha-45.

Spidery -> RE: Castles in the Sand - Spidery(J) vs MrKane(A) no MrKane please (4/20/2015 5:23:55 PM)
quote: The Ki83 will definitely help, and boy are you producing a lot of them! Frank R production, looks low, but then again in June perhaps that won't be low with all those 83s coming online. My rough rule of thumb, from Pax Mondo, was about 100 twin engine fighters per month for the end game...scenario 1. That was my plan, once the Ki-83 comes online I should be able to reduce the need for Ki-84r. I have been surprised by the amount of planes I have been losing. It is getting to the stage where I wonder if it is worth protecting Miri and Brunei, but if I stop here I am sure he will find somewhere else to attack. I am sure his Hellcat and Thunderbolt pools are huge. Not so sure about Corsairs and Lightnings.

Spidery -> RE: Castles in the Sand - Spidery(J) vs MrKane(A) no MrKane please (4/20/2015 5:27:51 PM)
I have lost 1148 planes over the last 20 days. The Allies have lost 548 over the same time (so taking into account 4E losses just about staying at the 2::1 loss VP ratio). In the same time I will have built about 1100 planes. However, a lot of them are bombers that are being stockpiled.

Lowpe -> RE: Castles in the Sand - Spidery(J) vs MrKane(A) no MrKane please (4/20/2015 5:32:32 PM)
It is depressing sometimes, how good the P47 is, but hold on soon you will be putting a hurt on him.[:)] In our Downfall game the Shinden has done really well versus high altitude P47 sweeps. I expect the Ki83 will do just as well or even better since their ceiling is higher than the Shinden. Good news on oil flowing from Singers to Port Arthur. Are you shipping any out of Port Arthur to the HI?

Spidery -> RE: Castles in the Sand - Spidery(J) vs MrKane(A) no MrKane please (4/20/2015 5:43:52 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lowpe It is depressing sometimes, how good the P47 is, but hold on soon you will be putting a hurt on him.[:)] In our Downfall game the Shinden has done really well versus high altitude P47 sweeps. I expect the Ki83 will do just as well or even better since their ceiling is higher than the Shinden. Good news on oil flowing from Singers to Port Arthur. Are you shipping any out of Port Arthur to the HI? Soon, 4 months away, I'll be lucky to have anywhere to defend[:D]. I expect the Shinden's speed is a real help. The Ki-83 at least has better maneuver. Been shipping from Fusan throughout. Dropping at Hong Kong. However, Port Arthur now can't even get the oil to keep its refineries running all the time.[X(]

Spidery -> RE: Castles in the Sand - Spidery(J) vs MrKane(A) no MrKane please (4/21/2015 8:17:13 AM)
March 15th 1944 Very mixed turn. Nail a sub, Miri airfields are closed, I expect he will close Brunei tomorrow. Guam lose a fort level but destroy his engineers. Shambles at Miri as Spitfire VIII's sweep and are followed up by about 240 Liberators with escorts. A reasonable amount of CAP is still airborne against the bombers but it can't close or do much damage. Miri airfield is closed and I lose 31 Ki-46-III KAI night fighters on the ground along with 30 day fighters[:@]. Allied attacks near Lashio are ambushed by Ki-84r that do well against the Spitfire Vc on sweep[:)] but are not able to do much damage to the bombers[:(]. Total air loss for the day 141 versus 56 with the Allies losing only 5 liberators so this is not even 2::1[:(]. SC Ch 37 sinks SS Raton near Singapore[8D] (night experience leaps from 45 to 55). SS Barb is badly damaged near Leyte[8D] but probably not fatally[:(]. The KB is no longer spotted but its rough location is known because I have a total of 9 claimed hits from aircraft on subs[8\|]. Allies attack at Guam again and reduce forts to 7[:(] but at a cost[:)]. In particular, I think their combat engineer battalion was obliterated which may handicap their ability to further reduce forts. quote: Attacking force 30698 troops, 512 guns, 693 vehicles, Assault Value = 1093 Defending force 29574 troops, 407 guns, 565 vehicles, Assault Value = 666 Allied engineers reduce fortifications to 7 Allied adjusted assault: 732 Japanese adjusted defense: 3053 Allied assault odds: 1 to 4 (fort level 7) Combat modifiers Defender: terrain(+), forts(+), disruption(-), experience(-) Attacker: Japanese ground losses: 691 casualties reported Squads: 1 destroyed, 46 disabled Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 15 disabled Engineers: 1 destroyed, 4 disabled Guns lost 21 (3 destroyed, 18 disabled) Vehicles lost 5 (1 destroyed, 4 disabled) Allied ground losses: 1362 casualties reported Squads: 27 destroyed, 43 disabled Non Combat: 33 destroyed, 57 disabled Engineers: 81 destroyed, 18 disabled Guns lost 30 (10 destroyed, 20 disabled) Vehicles lost 114 (50 destroyed, 64 disabled) Units destroyed 1 P1Y2-S to 8/44.

Spidery -> RE: Castles in the Sand - Spidery(J) vs MrKane(A) no MrKane please (4/21/2015 8:25:19 AM)
The Allies have been bombarding Guam a lot. There are two units there with anti-shipping guns. The 3rd Special Base Force with 8 CD guns and 10 DP guns and the Kure 7th SNLF with 24 DP guns. During the replay the 3rd SBF usually fires (and misses) at the enemy but the 7th SNLF never seems to. It may be a range thing as the DP guns can reach 17 while the CD guns have ranges of 32 or 21.

MrBlizzard -> RE: Castles in the Sand - Spidery(J) vs MrKane(A) no MrKane please (4/21/2015 11:00:58 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Spidery The Allies have been bombarding Guam a lot. There are two units there with anti-shipping guns. The 3rd Special Base Force with 8 CD guns and 10 DP guns and the Kure 7th SNLF with 24 DP guns. During the replay the 3rd SBF usually fires (and misses) at the enemy but the 7th SNLF never seems to. It may be a range thing as the DP guns can reach 17 while the CD guns have ranges of 32 or 21. If you like you can check it : in the animation it is showed the distance at which the bombardment TF fire

Spidery -> RE: Castles in the Sand - Spidery(J) vs MrKane(A) no MrKane please (4/22/2015 9:23:01 AM)
Deleted, managed to repeat the report from the 15th

Spidery -> RE: Castles in the Sand - Spidery(J) vs MrKane(A) no MrKane please (4/22/2015 3:00:55 PM)
March 16th 1944 Edit: fixed the date SC Ch 5 lost to SS Balao off Leyte. Just minor damage inflicted on some Allied subs (unless some of the aircraft hits are real). B-24j strike Lanchow manpower at night. Ki-45 KAId have their first engagement and do okay[:)] trading 7 losses for 11 B-24j downed (6 in air-air, 1 flak, 4 ops). No damage to industry. Thunderbolts sweep Brunei but no follow up from bombers. N1K2-J gets its first combat. 27 N1K1-J, 14 Ki-43-IV, 5 Ki-84r, 6 N1K2-J for 21 P-47D2 and 1 P-47D25. 52::22 losses. It was all going well until the last sweep caught a weakened and tired defense[:(]. Allies bomb troops in Burma and some Ki-84r arrive and he loses a few fighter-bombers. The planes were on LRCAP over Taung Gyi (range 5 from Chiang Mai) with a max range of 5 but decided to stray 3 hexes North. Altogether, 65 for 52 VP in the air[:)]. Allied bombardment at Guam is a disaster for them[8D] quote: Attacking force 996 troops, 98 guns, 84 vehicles, Assault Value = 939 Defending force 28669 troops, 401 guns, 566 vehicles, Assault Value = 630 Japanese ground losses: 9 casualties reported Squads: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled Allied ground losses: Guns lost 38 (32 destroyed, 6 disabled) Vehicles lost 18 (13 destroyed, 5 disabled) It looks like he was resting some of his tubes. I have 3 powerful artillery units here, a group of 4 30cm, the 3rd special base force with CD and DP guns, and a medium artillery unit of 10cm and 15cm tubes. I expect they all targeted the same Allied unit which is why it was so expensive for them.

Spidery -> RE: Castles in the Sand - Spidery(J) vs MrKane(A) no MrKane please (4/23/2015 3:29:23 PM)
March 17th 1944 Allies close Brunei with massive sweeps and strikes by Liberators. I had evacuated all night fighters so not so much lost on the ground. Unescorted, and without sweeps, Liberators day strike at Tsuyung and some Ki-84r on CAP perform well. I think trading at least 1 for 1. Day air loss: 28 N1K1-J, 26 Ki-84r, 19 N1K2-J, 14 Ki-43-IV for 15 F4U-1A, 11 P-38J, 11 F4U-1, 1 Spitfire VII, 1 P-38H, 1 F6F-3 and 13 B-24J. 97 to 73 VP on the day with all the little losses added in. I will now have to abandon Miri and Brunei. At least that will mean I can send more fighters to the Burma area. I have about 30,000 liquids on Borneo so need to see if there is anyway I can get this out. May be able to draw some from Jesselton or use some for refueling operations. Two Allied BB groups bombard Guam (from 15,000 yards - thanks MrBlizzard). The first is of little value but the second concentrates on the facilities and does a lot of damage to auxiliary forces: quote: Japanese ground losses: 663 casualties reported Squads: 2 destroyed, 4 disabled Non Combat: 35 destroyed, 24 disabled Engineers: 1 destroyed, 4 disabled Guns lost 28 (11 destroyed, 17 disabled) Vehicles lost 22 (9 destroyed, 13 disabled) A unit of 4 12cm AA gun is destroyed and will reform for the defense of Tokyo. Allied forces have withdrawn from Taung Gyi; is he re-locating to increase the attack on Lashio? Or has he pulled back so he can upgrade devices? A7M2 to 3/45

Spidery -> RE: Castles in the Sand - Spidery(J) vs MrKane(A) no MrKane please (4/23/2015 3:51:53 PM)
My air forces are all in a complete mess and I need to find some time to disentangle them. Fighter groups with low morale have been evacuated to Singapore, Manila, and Cebu. Transports are lifting surplus aviation support from Tarakan, Miri, Brunei and it needs to be re-distributed to appropriate bases. Lots of aviation support arriving at Tokyo. Main air bases in the Philippines. (A) is a route he could follow to base hop past the Southern Philippines without ever getting close to a major base. (B) is another route he might be able to bypass defenses. Aim is to get Singapore, Cebu and Manila as level 9 airfields with about 600+ aviation support. [image]local://upfiles/43194/2BDB0EA15ECC468DB5C0DA33036939CA.jpg[/image]

Lowpe -> RE: Castles in the Sand - Spidery(J) vs MrKane(A) no MrKane please (4/23/2015 4:55:36 PM)
Do all those little ASW TF work? Doesn't it consume a ton of fuel?

obvert -> RE: Castles in the Sand - Spidery(J) vs MrKane(A) no MrKane please (4/23/2015 5:32:34 PM)
I just looked back through your econ roundup for the last month. Considering what's been going on with your oil/fuel centers, you've got a pretty good reserve. Well done! Adding up your HI fuel usage and the ships use per day and multiplying that 29,235 by 365 I get 10,670,775 though. You may want to start some severe conservation measures now before the oil slows to a trickle. If you're still moving some you might consider using a bunch of convoys grouped in a mega convoy to minimize contacts and maximize escort efficiency. I remember Greyjoy used these a lot against Q-Ball and they worked pretty well. Also consider starting to minimize refueling of ships and start refueling the smaller ones from some big ones (until they run dry) you don't need to use for the remainder. A lot of fuel is usually tied up there in bunkers. I had whole refueling fleets of Aden class xAK around the HI.

Spidery -> RE: Castles in the Sand - Spidery(J) vs MrKane(A) no MrKane please (4/23/2015 5:34:31 PM)
March 18th 1944 DD Hayashimo takes a torpedo from SS Angler near Legaspi. With 4/47/0 damage she should make it to Naga without problems to be patched up. Liberators bomb Miri and destroy 14 planes on the ground being repaired. Little chance of saving the remainder. Allies are stepping up the campaign against Lashio and the troops in the jungle near there. Not having much effect really. BB bombard Guam again. DD Akishimo commissioned.

Spidery -> RE: Castles in the Sand - Spidery(J) vs MrKane(A) no MrKane please (4/23/2015 5:40:00 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lowpe Do all those little ASW TF work? Doesn't it consume a ton of fuel? They get a load of attacks on Allied subs and quite a few hits but hardly ever sink anything so I don't know if that counts as working or not. The ones in shallow waters are small PB boats or sub-chasers or E boats with Mod 2-DC. They are on a 1 hex patrol location with no reaction which means they only seem to use fuel when they launch an attack which happens occasionally to a passing sub. The ones active of Samar are 2 or 3 good ASW craft with a 1 or 2 hex reaction that means I am getting 2 or 3 attacks per day (or night). These do use some fuel but I think it is worth it. However, I may rein in the reaction as it isn't really needed in a target rich environment.

Spidery -> RE: Castles in the Sand - Spidery(J) vs MrKane(A) no MrKane please (4/23/2015 5:53:33 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: obvert I just looked back through your econ roundup for the last month. Considering what's been going on with your oil/fuel centers, you've got a pretty good reserve. Well done! Adding up your HI fuel usage and the ships use per day and multiplying that 29,235 by 365 I get 10,670,775 though. You may want to start some severe conservation measures now before the oil slows to a trickle. If you're still moving some you might consider using a bunch of convoys grouped in a mega convoy to minimize contacts and maximize escort efficiency. I remember Greyjoy used these a lot against Q-Ball and they worked pretty well. Also consider starting to minimize refueling of ships and start refueling the smaller ones from some big ones (until they run dry) you don't need to use for the remainder. A lot of fuel is usually tied up there in bunkers. I had whole refueling fleets of Aden class xAK around the HI. I have been running supply out to interesting places and then returning with resources and "do not fuel" set so I am now emptying most of the inefficient ships and quite a lot of other transport ships. For the transport run from Fusan I have stopped using CS convoys so I can run those dry. Certainly, I have enough tankers to move all the remaining fuel/oil without any need to refuel them. Tracker grossly overestimates fuel usage as it doesn't seem to allow for ships in task forces in port without orders or ships on 1-hex patrols. I have been watching it fairly closely and am using 4000 to 6000 fuel per day (plus what I extract from ship bunkers). I expect oil to run out mid 1944 and fuel to run out March 1945; it is difficult to predict how much fuel will be in ports that can't be accessed - I am guessing 2,000,000. I expect then to have enough HI and supply to last until about August 1945. This of course depends upon the Allied offensives.

Lowpe -> RE: Castles in the Sand - Spidery(J) vs MrKane(A) no MrKane please (4/23/2015 9:28:28 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Spidery Tracker grossly overestimates fuel usage as it doesn't seem to allow for ships in task forces in port without orders or ships on 1-hex patrols. On the Industry/Chart page?

obvert -> RE: Castles in the Sand - Spidery(J) vs MrKane(A) no MrKane please (4/23/2015 9:34:05 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Spidery quote: ORIGINAL: obvert I just looked back through your econ roundup for the last month. Considering what's been going on with your oil/fuel centers, you've got a pretty good reserve. Well done! Adding up your HI fuel usage and the ships use per day and multiplying that 29,235 by 365 I get 10,670,775 though. You may want to start some severe conservation measures now before the oil slows to a trickle. If you're still moving some you might consider using a bunch of convoys grouped in a mega convoy to minimize contacts and maximize escort efficiency. I remember Greyjoy used these a lot against Q-Ball and they worked pretty well. Also consider starting to minimize refueling of ships and start refueling the smaller ones from some big ones (until they run dry) you don't need to use for the remainder. A lot of fuel is usually tied up there in bunkers. I had whole refueling fleets of Aden class xAK around the HI. I have been running supply out to interesting places and then returning with resources and "do not fuel" set so I am now emptying most of the inefficient ships and quite a lot of other transport ships. For the transport run from Fusan I have stopped using CS convoys so I can run those dry. Certainly, I have enough tankers to move all the remaining fuel/oil without any need to refuel them. Tracker grossly overestimates fuel usage as it doesn't seem to allow for ships in task forces in port without orders or ships on 1-hex patrols. I have been watching it fairly closely and am using 4000 to 6000 fuel per day (plus what I extract from ship bunkers). I expect oil to run out mid 1944 and fuel to run out March 1945; it is difficult to predict how much fuel will be in ports that can't be accessed - I am guessing 2,000,000. I expect then to have enough HI and supply to last until about August 1945. This of course depends upon the Allied offensives. Sounds like you have it covered. What ports are currently inaccessible to getting the fuel/oil? Are these the DEI bases in range of Java?

Spidery -> RE: Castles in the Sand - Spidery(J) vs MrKane(A) no MrKane please (4/23/2015 10:24:02 PM)
quote: Sounds like you have it covered. What ports are currently inaccessible to getting the fuel/oil? Are these the DEI bases in range of Java? I think it is a comment you made towards the end of your AAR. But all the little ports in China, Japan, etc. take 1000 * port size in fuel demand even if no task forces are based there. That fuel isn't available for HI production. I think you had nearly a 500,000 in fuel at a point when your HI was shutting down. Then there is fuel in the Marianas and on Borneo island that I can only really get at for refueling subs and most of my subs are in the East at the moment. Actually, I don't think it is as bad as I guessed. Tracker currently reports 6.2 million fuel and 5.5 million of that is in Japan so only 700,000 is not at home.

Spidery -> RE: Castles in the Sand - Spidery(J) vs MrKane(A) no MrKane please (4/23/2015 10:24:59 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lowpe quote: ORIGINAL: Spidery Tracker grossly overestimates fuel usage as it doesn't seem to allow for ships in task forces in port without orders or ships on 1-hex patrols. On the Industry/Chart page? Yes.

obvert -> RE: Castles in the Sand - Spidery(J) vs MrKane(A) no MrKane please (4/24/2015 5:44:35 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Spidery quote: Sounds like you have it covered. What ports are currently inaccessible to getting the fuel/oil? Are these the DEI bases in range of Java? I think it is a comment you made towards the end of your AAR. But all the little ports in China, Japan, etc. take 1000 * port size in fuel demand even if no task forces are based there. That fuel isn't available for HI production. I think you had nearly a 500,000 in fuel at a point when your HI was shutting down. Then there is fuel in the Marianas and on Borneo island that I can only really get at for refueling subs and most of my subs are in the East at the moment. Actually, I don't think it is as bad as I guessed. Tracker currently reports 6.2 million fuel and 5.5 million of that is in Japan so only 700,000 is not at home. Yes. It is tough that you can't allocate to 0 for fuel in port when you want to discontinue use of a port. 700k is much better than 2,000k though! [:)] I'm just impressed with your preparation and determination. It's the worst nightmare for Japan to lose the DEI so early, but you've taken the blows and kept prepping. This is what it takes to last into 45 and still have fun while getting driven to a small red circle on the map around the HI. There are a lot of bad days, but if you stay positive the few good ones can keep you going. [:)]

Spidery -> RE: Castles in the Sand - Spidery(J) vs MrKane(A) no MrKane please (4/24/2015 8:29:01 AM)
quote: I'm just impressed with your preparation and determination. It's the worst nightmare for Japan to lose the DEI so early, but you've taken the blows and kept prepping. This is what it takes to last into 45 and still have fun while getting driven to a small red circle on the map around the HI. There are a lot of bad days, but if you stay positive the few good ones can keep you going. Thank-you. From the start my planning was to last into '46 so the early loss of the DEI trims 6 months off that. I don't really understand the issue about "determination". Unless the Allies throw in the towel, almost every game will result in Japan engaged in a desperate delaying action with too few, too poor, forces without adequate supplies. It is only a question of when that happens. MrKane's decision to send his subs out has made the game more enjoyable as it means every turn I can see some chances to strike at his forces and watch my ASW forces have a chance to sink one of his subs. I do wish I could find more opportunities to take the offensive but MrKane is very good about not exposing his ships and base AA is so deadly that strikes at bases seem pointless.

obvert -> RE: Castles in the Sand - Spidery(J) vs MrKane(A) no MrKane please (4/24/2015 9:12:15 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Spidery quote: I'm just impressed with your preparation and determination. It's the worst nightmare for Japan to lose the DEI so early, but you've taken the blows and kept prepping. This is what it takes to last into 45 and still have fun while getting driven to a small red circle on the map around the HI. There are a lot of bad days, but if you stay positive the few good ones can keep you going. Thank-you. From the start my planning was to last into '46 so the early loss of the DEI trims 6 months off that. I don't really understand the issue about "determination". Unless the Allies throw in the towel, almost every game will result in Japan engaged in a desperate delaying action with too few, too poor, forces without adequate supplies. It is only a question of when that happens. MrKane's decision to send his subs out has made the game more enjoyable as it means every turn I can see some chances to strike at his forces and watch my ASW forces have a chance to sink one of his subs. I do wish I could find more opportunities to take the offensive but MrKane is very good about not exposing his ships and base AA is so deadly that strikes at bases seem pointless. I agree. You'll probably get some good chances as he moves into range of your big bases. Also kamis again change the game.

Lowpe -> RE: Castles in the Sand - Spidery(J) vs MrKane(A) no MrKane please (4/24/2015 1:12:26 PM)
I think the closer the Allies get to the HI, and the more flush they are with planes and ships, the more reckless they get. In addition, Japan has interior lines and lots of bases to spring surprises from. Plus, with China gone I think Spidery is in great shape for the end game. Especially with his plane development.

Page: << < prev 64 65 [66] 67 68 next > >>

Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.469727