|
Nimrod 9th -> RE: Really this good? (12/1/2013 3:47:07 AM)
|
I have played the game lots and lots vs. the AI but never against a human. I love the game engine. Map is okay but could use a few more areas, especially in the east. Even though the game engine is excellent, the AI isn't. The Confederate AI puts a huge garrison in Richmond. TOO BIG. It will strip the entire South of troops to garrison Richmond if even a medium sized Union force invades Virginia. In some thread awhile back I read this could be "modeled" but I'm not good enough to "model." Also, in the West the Confederate AI is too aggressive. It defends Kentucky and Missouri with a passion. No defense in depth like JE Johnston wanted. I haven't played the South much so I can't give you a good description of the Union AI. My four Union Civil War grandfathers would raise up and haunt me if I played the South. Also, the naval part of the game isn't strong. I'm not saying it's bad. There just isn't much to it. I too like the optional general ratings. Fun to have an awful Grant and an excellent Ben Butler and everything in-between. I too like all the game options that can be turned on and off to give the exact difficulty you want. So, long story short ... like all computer games ... it has strengths and weaknesses ... good engine ... weak AI ... great difficulty options ... shallow naval play ... and so on.
|
|
|
|