[DONE] New scenario for testing: Operation Sling of David (2014) (Full Version)

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios



Message


rytech -> [DONE] New scenario for testing: Operation Sling of David (2014) (11/29/2013 2:31:51 AM)

So this is my first major attempt at a large-scale scenario for Command - feel free to download and reply with any comments, ideas for improvements, etc. Thanks!

quote:

Orders for Cmdr Israeli Forces

Situation – General

It has been six months since the signing of the Geneva interm agreement between the P-5+1 (the US, UK, France, Russia, China, and Germany) and Iran. The agreement held out the potential, despite our heavy skepticism, that a final accord could be reached ensuring the complete and verifiable non-usability of the Iranian nuclear program for nuclear weapons development, in exchange from sanctions relief from Western nations and the United Nations.

Unfortunately, as we expected, the talks did not ultimately come to a fruition. Through the Foreign Ministry's consultations with our Western allies, we had known that the talks were not going well, and that there was little chance of an accord. Heavy Congressional pressure on the US delegation to take a hard line against the Iranians, backed by intense lobbying of the part of the Israeli Government and Gulf Arab states, have enraged the Iranians, who have stated that "international Zionism and its American enablers continue to attempt to violate the sacred and inalienable rights of the great Iranian nation."

Two weeks ago, the Iranians pulled out of the talks and repudiated the Geneva Interm Accord, claiming that no agreement was possible that would not violate the "red line" of Iran's advanced nuclear enrichment program. Despite the repeated warnings of the Israeli and US governments, Russia, China, and many other nations (including much of the European Union) see US and Israeli intransigence as a cause of the collapse of the negotiations - as a result, the Foreign Ministry largely expects the collapse of much of the sanctions regime against Iran soon.

In the last 72 hours, the Iranian government has publicly ammounced its decision to resume full-scale nuclear enrichment - apparently they believe that with the United States' "retreat" from the Middle East, that they can do so without expecting the reimposition of sanctions or a military strike. They believe that the international pressure being brought upon the State of Israel to not carry out an attack will foreclose any Israeli military option.

As well, we have received intelligence from multiple sources that the Iranians soon plan to insert "hot" nuclear fuel rods and heavy water into the Arak nuclear reactor - an act that would render a potential military strike moot. If the reactor were to be struck whilst loaded with nuclear fuel, it would almost certainly cause a catastrophic nuclear meltdown and release of radioactivity on the scale of Chernobyl or worse - a prospect that would be politically devestating for Israel.

In the wake of this information, the Cabinet, roughly 36 hours ago, authorized the execution of Operation Sling of David - the designated plan for a full-scale aerial attack upon critical infrastructure nodes of the Iranian nuclear program.

Enemy Forces

Current intelligence indicates that Iran's integrated air defence system, whilst mostly outdated and consisting of 70's/80's-era platforms, is by no means negligible in capability. Expect significant numbers of AAA and SAM systems, mostly SA-2s, 3s, and 6s, but also including several long-range SA-5 batteries. As of yet, we do not believe that Iran has managed to obtain SA-10 systems.

Iran's fighter aircraft are a mix of Western and Soviet-bloc/Chinese platforms, including F-4s, F-5s, F-14s, and Mirage IIIs and Vs - however, Iran's fighter force is widely believed to be hampered by lack of maintenance/spare parts and low numbers of flying hours.

Mission

Using the available forces, you will launch a long-range strike into Iranian territory in order to destroy indicated aimpoints at critical infrastructure targets of the Iranian nuclear program. You will have only 12 hours to ingress, strike, and egress from the target points, as your forces will be tasked with offensive operations against Hezbollah forces in Lebanon soon afterwards - meaning you will only have one shot at the targets.

Available Forces

You have available to you three squadrons of F-15Is and F-16Is for strike and air defence suppression, plus two squadrons of F-15C/D for top cover, as well as the IAF's force of aerial refueling tankers and early warning aircraft.

Execution

There are 4 specified facilities to be attacked, as referenced on your tactical map. Each has multiple aimpoints (marked with a [TARGET] identifier):

(1) the Natanz uranium enrichment facility. This facility is the most crucial node in Iran's nuclear program, since it is home to the vast majority of Iran's 19,000 centrifuges, and hence is its most well defended. There are two main target sets here:

(i) the two underground centrifuge halls. These are buried under 20 feet of earth and reinforced with another 8 feet of steel-reinforced concrete. 12 F-15Is will be needed to destroy both hallls, with 3 aimpoints per hall spaced out to ensure maximum sufficient area overpressure coverage and 4 GBU-28s per aimpoint to ensure penetration and complete destruction of the centrifuges below.

(ii) the above-ground uranium separation pilot plant. 6 aimpoints, with 2 Griffin LGBs per aimpoint.

(2) the Arak heavy water reactor. This reactor and its attached facility possesses the ability to produce plutonium suitable for reprocessing into nuclear weapons material. 6 aimpoints: the reactor, two pairs of cooling towers, and 3 aimpoints at the heavy water production facility. 2 Griffins LGBs per.

(3) the Fordow uranium enrichment facility. This facility is too-deeply buried to be damaged with any of the weapons in the Israeli arsenal - hence this strike focuses on secondary targets. 7x aimpoints - the 6 tunnel entrances to the centrifuge halls and the electrical sub-station providing power to the on-site centrifuges. 2 Griffins per.

(4) the Esfahan uranium conversion facility. This facility converts mined yellowcake (uranium ore) into uranium hexafluoride (UF6) suitable for enrichment in the centrifuges. Three aimpoints, with 2x Griffins per.

The Cabinet has authorized three main routes for your strike force, at your discretion:

Northern: flying north over the Mediterranean, then east along the Syrian-Turkish-Iraqi border before coming down over the north. This route offers the possibility of refueling in international waters over the Mediterranean, but will likely offer the Iranians the earliest warning. Due to the current civil war brewing there, Syria's air defence capability is assessed as significantly degraded, and your flightplan takes you over rebel rather than government-held areas.

Central: flying east along the Syrian-Jordanian border, then straight across Iraq to the target area. This route is the most direct of the three, but also carries with it the uncertainty of flying over hostile Syrian territory.

Southern: along the Jordanian-Saudi border, thence across Iraq to the targets. Quiet indirect diplomacy with representatives of the Saudi royal family has secured us a route unmolested through Saudi territory, staged during a gap in radar coverage of the Saudi IADS to ensure Saudi deniability about foreknowledge of the strike. This route is the longest, but offers the possibility of refueling ops free of potential interruptions.

You are strongly urged to conduct your attacks from a high level to avoid AAA concentrations, as well as give your bombs enough kinetic energy to penetrate their targets;

You are NOT authorized to cross Turkish, Egyptian, or Jordanian airspace, as we will have enough diplomatic problems as it is without angering our putative allied countries further - even if you are successful.

This strike represents the most daring assault Israel has ever attempted - even more so than the attack to open the Six-Day War of 1967 that, coincidentally, was staged 67 years ago today. On your hands rests the continued future of the Jewish state and the Jewish people. Good luck.

Command & Signal

Command: “The Pit”, IDF Emergency Command Bunker, Israeli Ministry of Defence

Signals: EMCON B, Limited emissions


UPDATE 29 November 2013 - Removed for extensive edit in order to reduce clutter and frame issues. Will repost soon!

UPDATE 04 December 2013 - v2.0 reposted, with extraneous airfields removed for improved performance. Enjoy!




Maromak -> RE: New scenario for testing: Operation Sling of David (2014) (11/30/2013 2:17:26 PM)

Downloaded. Looks good.




Primarchx -> RE: New scenario for testing: Operation Sling of David (2014) (11/30/2013 7:46:22 PM)

Like what I see, but the Israeli airbases aren't quite done, especially magazines.




Coiler12 -> RE: New scenario for testing: Operation Sling of David (2014) (12/2/2013 10:19:33 AM)

There seems to be a lot of unnecessary clutter, especially in Israel itself.




rytech -> RE: New scenario for testing: Operation Sling of David (2014) (12/2/2013 4:41:57 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Coiler12

There seems to be a lot of unnecessary clutter, especially in Israel itself.


What specifically would you suggest could be removed from the scenario?




bsq -> RE: New scenario for testing: Operation Sling of David (2014) (12/2/2013 9:52:50 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: rytech


quote:

ORIGINAL: Coiler12

There seems to be a lot of unnecessary clutter, especially in Israel itself.


What specifically would you suggest could be removed from the scenario?

The 702 superfluous elements that comprise Ramon, Hatzerim, Tel Nov and Tel Aviv airfields. If you do not intent them ever to be individual targets, then delete all the components and model as you have done the other airfields ie single unit airfields.

The same goes for the Iranian airfields, if they are not targets, then use single unit airfields which behave identically to the clusters of individual ramp spaces bunkers, access points and runways you have used. If you take out this clutter, the scenario runs faster as the AI has less to track.

Seems to me that the rule of thumb for scenarios is 'if it adds nothing - don't add it'

It could be a brilliant scenario if you got rid of over 1000 needless units [8D]




rytech -> RE: New scenario for testing: Operation Sling of David (2014) (12/3/2013 1:12:31 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: bsq

quote:

ORIGINAL: rytech


quote:

ORIGINAL: Coiler12

There seems to be a lot of unnecessary clutter, especially in Israel itself.


What specifically would you suggest could be removed from the scenario?

The 702 superfluous elements that comprise Ramon, Hatzerim, Tel Nov and Tel Aviv airfields. If you do not intent them ever to be individual targets, then delete all the components and model as you have done the other airfields ie single unit airfields.

The same goes for the Iranian airfields, if they are not targets, then use single unit airfields which behave identically to the clusters of individual ramp spaces bunkers, access points and runways you have used. If you take out this clutter, the scenario runs faster as the AI has less to track.

Seems to me that the rule of thumb for scenarios is 'if it adds nothing - don't add it'

It could be a brilliant scenario if you got rid of over 1000 needless units [8D]



Roger. It'll take a while to rebuild. Will update the top post when its done.




CassioM -> RE: New scenario for testing: Operation Sling of David (2014) (12/4/2013 11:21:38 AM)

Great scenario. I liked it.

The briefing is very good too. Very informative.

This scenario is now among my favorites

We need more scenarios involving Israel. They are very challenging situations to win like a nice game of chess.




rytech -> RE: New scenario for testing: Operation Sling of David (2014) (12/4/2013 11:06:08 PM)

Updated version posted.

As well, anyone interested in reading the sources for OOB and weaponeering allocations can look at the links below:

http://csis.org/files/media/csis/pubs/090316_israelistrikeiran.pdf

http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/mideast/R42443.pdf

http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/files/is3104_pp007-033_raas_long.pdf




Primarchx -> RE: New scenario for testing: Operation Sling of David (2014) (12/6/2013 1:08:52 AM)

While planning I see that weaponeering calls for 22 x 2 Griffin LGBs [Natanz = 6 x 2, Arak = 6 x 2, Fordow 7 x 2 and Esfahan 3 x 2], yet only 18 a/c can sortie carrying 2 Griffin LGBs and there are no reloads at the airbase. I would assume if my orders are providing precise info on how to engage, the resources for doing so would be available.




Sardaukar -> RE: New scenario for testing: Operation Sling of David (2014) (2/3/2014 8:51:25 AM)

Great scenario, enjoying it a lot.

I did edit it after playing it few times. I added quite a few things on Israeli side, to correspond to my ideas about what else Israelis would use in that strike (which probably have nothing to do with reality...[:D]). So, I added/changed following assets.

- upgraded scenario to newest database

- fiddled with Patriots and their radars etc. Set Arrow/Patriot batteries all active, since Israel would be then in high alert. (Pity that Iron Dome is not in game). Added one LASS Aerostat to Jerusalem and few more Patriot units (with newest missiles). This is no way meant to be realistic, just trying to get hand on these things. [:D]

- changed all F-15C/D Baz to F-15C/D Baz-2000 (Baz Meshopar). According to my knowledge and public sources, IDF/AF had upgraded all operational F-15A/B/C/D planes to Baz Meshopar upgrade (Improved Falcon).
Since I lobbied for it and gave sources, planes are in newest database. This gives F-15s in Air Superiority role a long-range loadout of 2x AIM-120C AMRAAMs and 2x Python 4s. Planes also have integrated helmet mounted sight system etc. Major capability improvement also in game. Israel is planning to further upgrade F-15 fleet as precaution against more delays/cost-overruns of F-35 JSF program.

- added 4x Heron UAVs for target recon, one per target area. I made change to scenario starting time so that UAVs have time to arrive to targets during night time.

- added 8x F-16D Baraks with Delilah SEAD drones to support SEAD effort.

- added 2x Gulfstream G550 SEMA ELINT/SIGINT planes

- added 2x EC-130H Compass Call EW/Jammers

These changes make IDF/AF strike more powerful, but also more complicated to control. Did not change anything on Iranian side. I believe that these changes represent well the possible strike package they could use. Delilahs would be especially useful against SA-5 long range SAM sites, leaving HARMs to deal with more imminent threats. Jammers & UAVs would probably play big role in strike, at least it was publicly said so. Probably air-launched decoys too.





Sardaukar -> RE: New scenario for testing: Operation Sling of David (2014) (2/10/2014 10:57:04 AM)

Results from my edited scenario play using build 490:

SIDE: Iran
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------
12x SA-5c Gammon Single Rail
6x Building (Bar Lock B [P-50])
6x Building (Square Pair [5N62])
6x F-5E Tiger II
10x Mirage F.1EQ-6
10x F-7M Airguard
17x MiG-29 Fulcrum A
6x F-4E Phantom II
1x Vehicle (Chop Rest)
8x HQ-2b Guideline Single Rail
1x Building (Reactor)
13x Building (Large)
4x F-4D Phantom II
1x Radar (China JY-14 Great Wall)
8x 35mm Twin Oerlikon
3x F-14A Tomcat [F-14AM]
6x Structure (Tunnel Entrance)
1x Building (Electric Sub Station)
1x Ammo Bunker (Underground)
1x Vehicle (UAR-1021 Skyguard)
1x 35mm Twin Oerlikon [UAR-1021 Skyguard FCR]
4x 23mm ZU-23-2
2x F-14A Tomcat
3x M192 I-HAWK
2x Vehicle (AN/MPQ-46 HPI)
1x Vehicle (Gin Sling)


EXPENDITURES:
------------------
37x SA-5c Gammon [5V28M5]
25x AA-11 Archer [R-73]
6x 30mm Gsh-30-1 Burst [30 rnds]
16x PL-7 [R.550 Magic 1]
14x 30mm Type 30-1 x 2 Burst [30 rnds]
9x AA-8 Aphid [R-60TM]
3x 20mm M39 x 2 Burst [80 rnds]
28x AA-10 Alamo A [R-27R, MR SARH]
4x R.550 Magic 1
42x Generic Chaff Salvo [5x Cartridges]
10x AIM-7E2 Sparrow III
4x 20mm/85 M61A1 Vulcan Burst [100 rnds]
4x AIM-9N Sidewinder
1x 30mm DEFA 553 x 2 Burst [50 rnds]
15x Generic Flare Salvo [3x Cartridges, Single Spectral]
12x Shahab 3 [Conventional]
12x Shahab 3 RV [Conventional]
266x 35mm Twin Oerlikon Burst [20 rnds]
499x 23mm ZU-23-2 Burst [20 rnds]
4x AIM-54A Phoenix [Fakour-90]
12x AIM-7E4 Sparrow III
27x HQ-2b Guideline
165x 35mm Twin Oerlikon Burst [20 rnds, UAR-1021 Skyguard]
4x AIM-23C I-HAWK [Sejil]
16x SA-6a Gainful [9M336]



SIDE: Israel
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------
5x F-16D Falcon [Barak]
4x Heron TP [Eitan] UAV
7x F-16I Falcon [Sufa]
5x F-15C Eagle [Baz-2000]
3x F-15D Eagle [Baz-2000]


EXPENDITURES:
------------------
134x AIM-120C-5 AMRAAM P3I.2
12x Delilah-AL
35x Generic Flare Salvo [3x Cartridges, Single Spectral]
81x Generic Chaff Salvo [5x Cartridges]
6x Python 5
12x AGM-88A HARM
42x Python 4
280x 20mm/85 M61A1 Vulcan Burst [100 rnds]
42x Arrow 2
8x MIM-104E Patriot PAC-2 GEM+
60x Mk82 500lb LDGP
29x Griffin LGB [Mk84]
24x GBU-28/B Deep Throat LGB [BLU-113/B]


Result was Triumph, so not too bad. But I got too many losses. Some were from my own stupidity, some from AI's. Few F-16Is and F-15C/Ds were lost STRAFING (!) their strike targets. Seems that escorts attached to strike mission do that. Unpleasant surprise.

Might need to think new approach to F-16D SEAD attacks, lost 7 out of 8 F-16Ds. Maybe I'll try to get some decoys (albeit Heron/Eitan drones already soak some attention) on the air or something. And have to be careful about escorting strikes. Probably over half of my losses were preventable.




dillonkbase -> RE: New scenario for testing: Operation Sling of David (2014) (3/12/2014 11:09:29 PM)

Seems like I need to reload... however the 2 closest iranian air bases seem to be single unit... which I think makes it practically impossible for me to stop them from continuing to launch. Unless the ROE restricts their targeting I would love it if these could be changed into the multiunit versions.




Sardaukar -> RE: New scenario for testing: Operation Sling of David (2014) (3/13/2014 9:15:28 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: dillonkbase

Seems like I need to reload... however the 2 closest iranian air bases seem to be single unit... which I think makes it practically impossible for me to stop them from continuing to launch. Unless the ROE restricts their targeting I would love it if these could be changed into the multiunit versions.


Iranian airbases are not your targets, you have specific targets in scenario and don't have any planes to spare for airfield interdiction.




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
5.796875