Debug Mode

Debug Mode (Full Version)

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames

Message

IKerensky -> Debug Mode (1/13/2014 12:20:16 AM)
Is the full debug mode avaliable with the release ? Picking dice roll, putting/removing counter from the map, setting the date ?

Cad908 -> RE: Debug Mode (1/13/2014 1:33:25 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: KERENSKY Is the full debug mode avaliable with the release ? Picking dice roll, putting/removing counter from the map, setting the date ? Full Debug mode is limited to Beta testers. In solitaire the player has the option to input the dice rolls, just go to Interface Player Interface Settings "check" the box for Set die rolls under Simulation Control -Rob

IKerensky -> RE: Debug Mode (1/13/2014 11:17:18 AM)
Is it possible to add this feature in the next patch ? One of the best use I have of MWIF is to play the arbiter in our FtF game, to do so It need to be able to set up counter.

Cad908 -> RE: Debug Mode (1/13/2014 4:06:32 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: KERENSKY Is it possible to add this feature in the next patch ? One of the best use I have of MWIF is to play the arbiter in our FtF game, to do so It need to be able to set up counter. Steve's call, but I would guess not. The debug feature the Beta testers use is a little quirky, Steve created it to allow us to do a few things and was never intended for release. -Rob

Numdydar -> RE: Debug Mode (1/13/2014 4:09:23 PM)
From what Steve has said, it can easily break the game if used incorrectly. He also said that it would take a considerable amout of time to get it to the point that it could be used in the retail versions. So I would not expect anything like this for a long time, if ever.

Centuur -> RE: Debug Mode (1/13/2014 5:48:27 PM)
I wouldn't say never, but at this moment I agree with Rob. Maybe in the future, with a manual, since especially the one which is used to place or remove units need to be used wisely to prevent in game crashes.

celebrindal -> RE: Debug Mode (1/13/2014 8:53:29 PM)
Actually I'd think this would help a few folks continue their game.. things like removing units that should have been out of supply and dead, putting things into supply even if impluse by impulse, removing or adding units on DoW that are not working.. things of that nature.

Shannon V. OKeets -> RE: Debug Mode (1/14/2014 12:14:56 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: celebrindal Actually I'd think this would help a few folks continue their game.. things like removing units that should have been out of supply and dead, putting things into supply even if impluse by impulse, removing or adding units on DoW that are not working.. things of that nature. I would rather spend my time fixing bugs so such problems don't arise.

IKerensky -> RE: Debug Mode (1/14/2014 12:52:59 AM)
While you are working on fixing the code, why not give the players a way to fix their games ?

joshuamnave -> RE: Debug Mode (1/14/2014 1:23:20 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Shannon V. OKeets quote: ORIGINAL: celebrindal Actually I'd think this would help a few folks continue their game.. things like removing units that should have been out of supply and dead, putting things into supply even if impluse by impulse, removing or adding units on DoW that are not working.. things of that nature. I would rather spend my time fixing bugs so such problems don't arise. Me too. But I've had the game a month or more, and still can't play it the way it's intended to play. Overseas supply, supply in China are still issues that affect the outcome of the game. Partisans working, then not working, then working again, the new bug with removing air units, the one playing Australian units, these are issues that affect the outcome of the game. Then there are crash bugs, which just make the game more frustrating. I don't hold you responsible and I'm glad you're working so hard on squashing the bugs... but put me down as one of the people in favor of having some kind of work around that we can use to fix broken games while we wait. I also think that long term, the debug tool is something I want, something a lot of players will want. The ability to set up positions, change positions, play "what if's", or even create scenarios will be a major selling point for this game. Some nights I don't want to sit down to a long drawn out game, or have time for a shorter Barbarossa, but if someone made a 1 turn Kursk scenario, or a Spain/Gibraltar scenario, for example, that might scratch the itch nicely on those days. A debug tool makes that possible.

CrusssDaddy -> RE: Debug Mode (1/14/2014 3:39:39 AM)
This is one of the things I never understood -- why remove debug? Playing CWiF, I have numerous options using debug to fix resources. If I'm lazy, I can simply add build points directly, or destroy a factory and replace it with one in a more convenient location, or add factories or synth oil, or skip production and just add units directly to the production spiral. It allows you to work around other bugs, like the weirdness that results among conquered French-aligned minors when France goes Vichy with no Free France. You can temporarily overstack to shuffle units on a crowded frontline. Additionally, debug allows you to create your own "What If?" scenarios. The uses are endlessly satisfying. Steve's reasoning for eliminating debug was, "Because people might crash the game by putting Brazilian units in Berlin when Brazil was not yet activated," and this is of course an absurd contrivance meant to cover for some other agenda or deficiency.

joshuamnave -> RE: Debug Mode (1/14/2014 3:53:24 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: CrusssDaddy Steve's reasoning for eliminating debug was, "Because people might crash the game by putting Brazilian units in Berlin when Brazil was not yet activated," and this is of course an absurd contrivance meant to cover for some other agenda or deficiency. Oh I doubt that. There are no sinister motives here. Most likely the debug utility that the playtesters use is a backend system that is both not user friendly and not entirely stable. Fixing it up for general release takes time away from working on other bugs. And in that scenario, let's get the bugs fixed. But long term, I still want the debug tool. And if it's going to take several months to get the game into the kind of shape it really should have been in on release (ie... 98% of the players can play 98% of their games all the way through without a crash, and all of the rules work the way they're supposed to work), then I would rethink that prioritization and give us a debug tool sooner so that we can play the game we bought the way it was intended.

Shannon V. OKeets -> RE: Debug Mode (1/14/2014 7:45:09 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Zartacla quote: ORIGINAL: Shannon V. OKeets quote: ORIGINAL: celebrindal Actually I'd think this would help a few folks continue their game.. things like removing units that should have been out of supply and dead, putting things into supply even if impluse by impulse, removing or adding units on DoW that are not working.. things of that nature. I would rather spend my time fixing bugs so such problems don't arise. Me too. But I've had the game a month or more, and still can't play it the way it's intended to play. Overseas supply, supply in China are still issues that affect the outcome of the game. Partisans working, then not working, then working again, the new bug with removing air units, the one playing Australian units, these are issues that affect the outcome of the game. Then there are crash bugs, which just make the game more frustrating. I don't hold you responsible and I'm glad you're working so hard on squashing the bugs... but put me down as one of the people in favor of having some kind of work around that we can use to fix broken games while we wait. I also think that long term, the debug tool is something I want, something a lot of players will want. The ability to set up positions, change positions, play "what if's", or even create scenarios will be a major selling point for this game. Some nights I don't want to sit down to a long drawn out game, or have time for a shorter Barbarossa, but if someone made a 1 turn Kursk scenario, or a Spain/Gibraltar scenario, for example, that might scratch the itch nicely on those days. A debug tool makes that possible. A player using the 'debug' tool can create more bugs in one sitting than I can fix in a month of Sundays. The bugs that 'feature' creates are not necessarily immediately obvious. They can occur several phases, impulses, or even turns later. And then the players would complain that the game "doesn't work". I've already spent enough time (months probably) trying to fix problems in saved games where the problems were caused by people using the 'debug' feature. A total waste of time by all concerned. I use it very rarely and I am extremely careful to limit its use to just what I need to recreate a unique situation for testing purposes. 98% of the time I work from saved games that I know are 'clean'. I already spend a lot of time simply investigating reported problems, with the majority turning out to not be bugs. If you remove duplicates, the number that I investigate which I discard is well over 90%. Adding spurious bug reports caused by players using the 'debug' feature wouldn't make anyone's life easier. Bear in mind that "one little change" in the game state can have disastrous consequences because of the extremely high level of interactions between the game elements. Repositioning an air unit because you forgot to rebase it can affect: the number of minor country units outside their home country, foreign troop commitments, collapsing Vichy France, neutrality pact restrictions, stacking limits (many different ones), friendly units in enemy controlled hexes, ... Way back in 2006 I used the debug tool to place units from all the major powers in the middle of the USSR (or the USA) just to display the different depictions of unit types and country colors - and solicit opinions from forum members. The debug tool didn't object at all to having units from all the Axis major powers and minor countries scattered hither and yon. In fact, I could have placed naval units in the middle of Kansas or the Ural mountains. That might have caused some problem later during the return to base phase.[;)] I have no plans for ever making the debug feature available to customers. A ton of work for marginal benefit and certain to cause enormous headaches later.

CrusssDaddy -> RE: Debug Mode (1/15/2014 1:17:34 AM)
You heard it here, fellas -- 10 years wasn't enough time to fix convoys, but more than enough to break a capably functioning debug feature. Commendable work.

AxelNL -> RE: Debug Mode (1/15/2014 5:49:26 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: CrusssDaddy You heard it here, fellas -- 10 years wasn't enough time to fix convoys, but more than enough to break a capably functioning debug feature. Commendable work. How long have you been a critic from the sideline, without any constructive effort? Very commendable. [sm=dizzy.gif][sm=dizzy.gif][sm=crazy.gif]

joshuamnave -> RE: Debug Mode (1/15/2014 6:28:18 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: AxelNL quote: ORIGINAL: CrusssDaddy You heard it here, fellas -- 10 years wasn't enough time to fix convoys, but more than enough to break a capably functioning debug feature. Commendable work. How long have you been a critic from the sideline, without any constructive effort? Very commendable. [sm=dizzy.gif][sm=dizzy.gif][sm=crazy.gif] I'm not unsympathetic to your position - I know how hard and often unrewarding it can be to be a beta tester or a playtester. I even did it for a living for a while, when I was a lot younger. But that doesn't make him wrong, nor is a paying customer under any ethical, moral or financial obligation to help improve the product before complaining about it. His complaint is valid - the convoy system is bad, and appears to be near universally disliked, while a functional debug tool would be very useful in working around the many bugs and nice to have for scenario builders and armchair generals. Sure, there are nicer ways that he could have said it, but trust me I'm right there with him in terms of my frustration with the current state of the game.

warspite1 -> RE: Debug Mode (1/15/2014 6:51:27 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Zartacla quote: ORIGINAL: AxelNL quote: ORIGINAL: CrusssDaddy You heard it here, fellas -- 10 years wasn't enough time to fix convoys, but more than enough to break a capably functioning debug feature. Commendable work. How long have you been a critic from the sideline, without any constructive effort? Very commendable. [sm=dizzy.gif][sm=dizzy.gif][sm=crazy.gif] I'm not unsympathetic to your position - I know how hard and often unrewarding it can be to be a beta tester or a playtester. I even did it for a living for a while, when I was a lot younger. But that doesn't make him wrong, nor is a paying customer under any ethical, moral or financial obligation to help improve the product before complaining about it. His complaint is valid - the convoy system is bad, and appears to be near universally disliked, while a functional debug tool would be very useful in working around the many bugs and nice to have for scenario builders and armchair generals. Sure, there are nicer ways that he could have said it, but trust me I'm right there with him in terms of my frustration with the current state of the game. warspite1 Zartacla I see you joined at the start of the year. I assume you do not know of the "history" here. What you say is partly right. However, CrusssDaddy is not a paying customer. He has made it perfectly clear in previous posts that MWIF is not for him - its too expensive, the graphics are rubbish and overall the game offers nothing more than that provided by CWIF. However, even if he is not a paying customer I guess he still has the right to voice an opinion, although would question why someone would waste their life hanging around a forum for a game they are never going to play... Each to his own I guess. But its more than that I'm afraid, AxelNL's response was no doubt driven by the guy's previous. Over the years he has been routinely, (very) rude, vindictive and plain trollish in his behaviour, venting his spleen at Steve (competence, mocking his illness), Matrix (conspiracy theories about not wanting the game released), Beta Testers (fanboys) and, more recently and for no apparent reason, Neilster I think it was (perhaps he thought he was a Beta Tester?). Yes we are all frustrated with elements of the game, and when you pay good money for something that does not work right, then frustration can spill over. Sadly in this person's case its been more than that.

AxelNL -> RE: Debug Mode (1/15/2014 12:12:59 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: warspite1 quote: ORIGINAL: Zartacla quote: ORIGINAL: AxelNL quote: ORIGINAL: CrusssDaddy You heard it here, fellas -- 10 years wasn't enough time to fix convoys, but more than enough to break a capably functioning debug feature. Commendable work. How long have you been a critic from the sideline, without any constructive effort? Very commendable. [sm=dizzy.gif][sm=dizzy.gif][sm=crazy.gif] I'm not unsympathetic to your position - I know how hard and often unrewarding it can be to be a beta tester or a playtester. I even did it for a living for a while, when I was a lot younger. But that doesn't make him wrong, nor is a paying customer under any ethical, moral or financial obligation to help improve the product before complaining about it. His complaint is valid - the convoy system is bad, and appears to be near universally disliked, while a functional debug tool would be very useful in working around the many bugs and nice to have for scenario builders and armchair generals. Sure, there are nicer ways that he could have said it, but trust me I'm right there with him in terms of my frustration with the current state of the game. warspite1 Zartacla I see you joined at the start of the year. I assume you do not know of the "history" here. What you say is partly right. However, CrusssDaddy is not a paying customer. He has made it perfectly clear in previous posts that MWIF is not for him - its too expensive, the graphics are rubbish and overall the game offers nothing more than that provided by CWIF. However, even if he is not a paying customer I guess he still has the right to voice an opinion, although would question why someone would waste their life hanging around a forum for a game they are never going to play... Each to his own I guess. But its more than that I'm afraid, AxelNL's response was no doubt driven by the guy's previous. Over the years he has been routinely, (very) rude, vindictive and plain trollish in his behaviour, venting his spleen at Steve (competence, mocking his illness), Matrix (conspiracy theories about not wanting the game released), Beta Testers (fanboys) and, more recently and for no apparent reason, Neilster I think it was (perhaps he thought he was a Beta Tester?). Yes we are all frustrated with elements of the game, and when you pay good money for something that does not work right, then frustration can spill over. Sadly in this person's case its been more than that. Warspite1 - thanks for intervening, buddy. You described it perfectly. For the rest of the readers: my apologies that I let my emotions get the upper hand. On the subject itself I reserve my own opinion (also a bit bounded by the NDA I accepted). My reaction was purely against Crussdaddy, whom I probably gave exact what he wanted. I suspect he get's a kick out of this. For Crussdaddy: [sm=nono.gif]

CrusssDaddy -> RE: Debug Mode (1/15/2014 12:58:54 PM)
Nope, not a paying customer. That is correct. I first criticized removing debug 3+ years ago, and received support from experienced CWiF players -- stubborn resistance to reintroducing the feature (and it is most certainly a feature) caused my resistance to the project to metastasize into refusal. If after all this time convoys are still bugged beyond all use, then I don't believe questioning whether Steve can ever repair them is unreasonable. Debug would certainly help you out with that, and then if Steve did manage to tame the bugs you would still have a tool for scenario building. Again, Steve's excuse is ludicrous -- no debug because if you plop units from every nation in the middle of Nebraska in a neutral USA, some funny business may result? No s***. Just ignore bug reports from debug games, good lord...

brian brian -> RE: Debug Mode (1/15/2014 1:39:53 PM)
No Soup For You!

Centuur -> RE: Debug Mode (1/15/2014 2:56:27 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: CrusssDaddy Nope, not a paying customer. That is correct. I first criticized removing debug 3+ years ago, and received support from experienced CWiF players -- stubborn resistance to reintroducing the feature (and it is most certainly a feature) caused my resistance to the project to metastasize into refusal. If after all this time convoys are still bugged beyond all use, then I don't believe questioning whether Steve can ever repair them is unreasonable. Debug would certainly help you out with that, and then if Steve did manage to tame the bugs you would still have a tool for scenario building. Again, Steve's excuse is ludicrous -- no debug because if you plop units from every nation in the middle of Nebraska in a neutral USA, some funny business may result? No s***. Just ignore bug reports from debug games, good lord... Criticism should be based on ownership of the game or being a beta tester if you criticize a game before it comes on the market. You got two options: buy the game and know what you are talking about or don't buy it and don't bother us with an opinion which isn't based on the facts!

Centuur -> RE: Debug Mode (1/15/2014 3:06:04 PM)
I will now give an example on how things can go wrong using the debug tool... In my AAR I've run into troubles with setting up the US oil points (known bug). So I decided to use the debug tool for that. It worked fine at that moment, giving me three oil points in a city. Fine, everything is OK, so let's continue... Now, Steve did rewrite the setup and reinforcement placement for units and suddenly after restoring the game, I'm having 10 oil points in that city and an overstacking regression happening, while all other oil points aren't involved. So I'm now deliberating how to proceed with the AAR. I probably have to use the Debug tool again to fix things... [:@] Bad luck, but that's how it is when using the debug tool. Sometimes it's great but sometimes you can really, really get all kinds of strange things happening...

CrusssDaddy -> RE: Debug Mode (1/15/2014 4:00:40 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Centuur I will now give an example on how things can go wrong using the debug tool... In my AAR I've run into troubles with setting up the US oil points (known bug). So I decided to use the debug tool for that. It worked fine at that moment, giving me three oil points in a city. Fine, everything is OK, so let's continue... Now, Steve did rewrite the setup and reinforcement placement for units and suddenly after restoring the game, I'm having 10 oil points in that city and an overstacking regression happening, while all other oil points aren't involved. So I'm now deliberating how to proceed with the AAR. I probably have to use the Debug tool again to fix things... [:@] Bad luck, but that's how it is when using the debug tool. Sometimes it's great but sometimes you can really, really get all kinds of strange things happening... You may have to adjust the oil points again? But... that could take a few seconds?!?!? CWiF debug provides you multiple work-arounds for oil difficulties: adjust points for yourself or lend-lease allies, add synth oil resources, un-disrupt units manually, add units to the production spiral, etc.

CrusssDaddy -> RE: Debug Mode (1/15/2014 4:07:35 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Centuur quote: ORIGINAL: CrusssDaddy Nope, not a paying customer. That is correct. I first criticized removing debug 3+ years ago, and received support from experienced CWiF players -- stubborn resistance to reintroducing the feature (and it is most certainly a feature) caused my resistance to the project to metastasize into refusal. If after all this time convoys are still bugged beyond all use, then I don't believe questioning whether Steve can ever repair them is unreasonable. Debug would certainly help you out with that, and then if Steve did manage to tame the bugs you would still have a tool for scenario building. Again, Steve's excuse is ludicrous -- no debug because if you plop units from every nation in the middle of Nebraska in a neutral USA, some funny business may result? No s***. Just ignore bug reports from debug games, good lord... Criticism should be based on ownership of the game or being a beta tester if you criticize a game before it comes on the market. You got two options: buy the game and know what you are talking about or don't buy it and don't bother us with an opinion which isn't based on the facts! If you are bothered by my opinion, simply don't read what I have to say. It's really that simple. From what I'm told the little green button can make my posts -- and your problem -- magically disappear. It's like a debug feature for the forum!

AxelNL -> RE: Debug Mode (1/15/2014 4:11:21 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: CrusssDaddy quote: ORIGINAL: Centuur quote: ORIGINAL: CrusssDaddy Nope, not a paying customer. That is correct. I first criticized removing debug 3+ years ago, and received support from experienced CWiF players -- stubborn resistance to reintroducing the feature (and it is most certainly a feature) caused my resistance to the project to metastasize into refusal. If after all this time convoys are still bugged beyond all use, then I don't believe questioning whether Steve can ever repair them is unreasonable. Debug would certainly help you out with that, and then if Steve did manage to tame the bugs you would still have a tool for scenario building. Again, Steve's excuse is ludicrous -- no debug because if you plop units from every nation in the middle of Nebraska in a neutral USA, some funny business may result? No s***. Just ignore bug reports from debug games, good lord... Criticism should be based on ownership of the game or being a beta tester if you criticize a game before it comes on the market. You got two options: buy the game and know what you are talking about or don't buy it and don't bother us with an opinion which isn't based on the facts! If you are bothered by my opinion, simply don't read what I have to say. It's really that simple. From what I'm told the little green button can make my posts -- and your problem -- magically disappear. It's like a debug feature for the forum! Done

Centuur -> RE: Debug Mode (1/15/2014 4:58:07 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: CrusssDaddy quote: ORIGINAL: Centuur quote: ORIGINAL: CrusssDaddy Nope, not a paying customer. That is correct. I first criticized removing debug 3+ years ago, and received support from experienced CWiF players -- stubborn resistance to reintroducing the feature (and it is most certainly a feature) caused my resistance to the project to metastasize into refusal. If after all this time convoys are still bugged beyond all use, then I don't believe questioning whether Steve can ever repair them is unreasonable. Debug would certainly help you out with that, and then if Steve did manage to tame the bugs you would still have a tool for scenario building. Again, Steve's excuse is ludicrous -- no debug because if you plop units from every nation in the middle of Nebraska in a neutral USA, some funny business may result? No s***. Just ignore bug reports from debug games, good lord... Criticism should be based on ownership of the game or being a beta tester if you criticize a game before it comes on the market. You got two options: buy the game and know what you are talking about or don't buy it and don't bother us with an opinion which isn't based on the facts! If you are bothered by my opinion, simply don't read what I have to say. It's really that simple. From what I'm told the little green button can make my posts -- and your problem -- magically disappear. It's like a debug feature for the forum! I'm not bothered by your opinion. I'm bothered by the way you are behaving on this forum. You are claiming to have supreme knowledge of MWIF while you don't even own the game. You are saying you know exactly how the debug function operates, while you don't know if this function did change at all since CWIF. How can you tell, without being a beta tester? And the green button? Why don't you press it, than you won't be bothered with my opinion on your contributions on this forum anymore. I won't, because I pity you and I still hope that you will make a positive contribution on this forum, using knowledge of MWIF instead of knowledge of an obsolete and absolutely non-functioning CWIF... So surprise me, and spend the dollars to buy MWIF and start talking out of knowledge, instead of what we call in the Netherlands the proverbial thumb.

CrusssDaddy -> RE: Debug Mode (1/15/2014 6:55:08 PM)
I think in the Netherlands sitting on thumbs is perhaps more popular than talking from them (with? to? I don't get the idiom), judging by your tireless attempts to stifle discussion and maintain the status quo. Critical discussion is the only thing moving needle. If no one had spoken up beginning a couple years ago, and more intensely early last year, the game would still be unreleased while they waited for the AI to be finished (as if!). If no one had spoken up after release about download-only, that would not be available. Now people are talking about a debug mode (you may notice I did not begin this thread) -- maybe they will get one, more likely they won't, but I am happy to discuss the wonderful debug mode that was removed from CWiF that I think would really come in handy for MWiF players right now. Efforts to derail discussion are typically a fear response. You do not need to fear alternative opinions, they do not invalidate your own.

Centuur -> RE: Debug Mode (1/15/2014 7:17:27 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: CrusssDaddy I think in the Netherlands sitting on thumbs is perhaps more popular than talking from them (with? to? I don't get the idiom), judging by your tireless attempts to stifle discussion and maintain the status quo. Critical discussion is the only thing moving needle. If no one had spoken up beginning a couple years ago, and more intensely early last year, the game would still be unreleased while they waited for the AI to be finished (as if!). If no one had spoken up after release about download-only, that would not be available. Now people are talking about a debug mode (you may notice I did not begin this thread) -- maybe they will get one, more likely they won't, but I am happy to discuss the wonderful debug mode that was removed from CWiF that I think would really come in handy for MWiF players right now. Efforts to derail discussion are typically a fear response. You do not need to fear alternative opinions, they do not invalidate your own. Talking from you thumb means that someone is saying things they don't know anything about. Now, you may be an expert on CWIF, you may be an expert on Wif, that doesn't make you an expert on MWIF. But again, I am very disappointed on your answer. Buy the game and than you can put your neverending complaints and attacks in here. I don't care, since than you are contributing and have committed yourself. If you don't buy the game than you don't know what is important to have and what isn't in MWIF. You might guess, but that isn't good enough...

David Clark -> RE: Debug Mode (1/20/2014 3:52:38 AM)
I recognize the necessity to cut down on the bugfix support burden, and agree that enabling the debug menu now might be counterproductive. As a compromise, could we get a commitment from Matrix that when Steve's contract is cancelled and the product becomes unsupported, that the debug menu will be enabled so we can work around whatever bugs remain?

Numdydar -> RE: Debug Mode (1/20/2014 4:06:35 AM)
Why on earth would you even say such a thing? Would you rather not have any MWiF at all? Becasue without Steve, we would not even have a game to complain about. Personally I would much rather have the WiF game we currently have, bugs and all, versus not having one. Of course if you are right, then that means, no AI, no additional features, etc. because if Steve goes away there is no one else to do this. ADG tried and failed with CWiF. No one else in the entire world was willing to take on this project execpt Steve. So unless you have lots of dollars to lose on putting togeather a programing team to 'fix' it the way you want it, it would be a far better path to try and HELP solve the issues in the game versus complaining about not having a debug mode. Geez.

Page: [1] 2 next > >>

Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.953125