Courtenay -> RE: New to the game - Basic Questions (10/10/2014 7:09:56 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Ur_Vile_WEdge And since partisans don't control the hex, I'm not even sure you can properly "invade" it at all. And yet it would be absurd to say you can just debark at sea to a hex where a hostile partisan is sitting. Hence my confusion. I am confused, both by the rule and by which side's partisan is in the hex. I will try for an exhaustive listing: A friendly, cooperating partisan is the hex: You may debark units in the hex, no matter which side owns the hex. A friendly, non-cooperating partisan is in the hex: You can not invade or debark into the hex. You can not stack with that unit. You can't move onto the hex with a non-cooperating unit from an adjacent hex, so why should you be able to invade that hex? If you really want to invade a hex with a friendly, non-cooperating partisan, you must move the partisan out of the hex first. (The sequence of play allows you to invade the impulse you do this, as invasions happen after land movement.) If the hex is friendly owned, you can now debark into it, and if enemy owned, you may invade. This of course restores the enemy notional unit in the hex, so you will have to fight your way ashore, unless the enemy's notional's strength is reduced to zero for some reason. An enemy partisan is in an enemy owned hex: You can not debark into the hex, but you can invade, fighting both the notional and the partisan (and any other enemy units in the hex.) An enemy partisan is in a friendly owned hex: Here is where the rules are confusing. You can not debark into the hex. Logically, one should be able to invade the hex, but I can find no rule allowing you to do so. However, everyone I know of (including myself) thinks that such an invasion is legal. Here is the rule: quote:
Invasions allow your land units to attack enemy held coastal hexes that touch upon a sea area to which you have transported the land units. You may only invade an enemy controlled coastal hex that has at least 1 all-sea hexside (at least part, but not necessarily all, of this coastal hexside must touch upon the sea area where the TRS is located). The key, I think, is the word "held" in the first sentence. That word is not defined in WiF. I believe, however, that everyone interprets "held" to include a hex held by an enemy partisan, even if it controlled by your side. Unfortunately, the second sentence uses the word controlled, and a rules lawyer might argue that this means you could not invade the hex. In this case, I would say that someone made a mistake, and allow the invasion. Then the question would arise: is there a notional unit?
|
|
|
|