RE: SECDEF Talks About New Frigate to Follow LCS (Full Version)

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series



Message


Primarchx -> RE: SECDEF Talks About New Frigate to Follow LCS (3/1/2014 5:02:22 PM)

How does NSM stack up compared to LRASM, D?




NakedWeasel -> RE: SECDEF Talks About New Frigate to Follow LCS (3/1/2014 5:28:11 PM)

The LRASM is based on the JASSM, has a range of approximately 300km. The Kongsberg JSM is based on their NSM, has a range of approximately 290km. The main differences appears to be sensors and avionics, and warheads. The LRASM has an advanced active/passive radar seeker, with two-way datalink, and autonomous AI navigation. The LRASM has a much larger warhead, approx. 1000kg.
The JSM utilizes an advanced IIR seeker, with autonomous target recognition. The JSM follows a very complex course for stealthy ingress to target. The JSM has a warhead of approx. 125kg.

Really, we'd be lucky to get both weapons, The LRASM is the more capable ship/sub launched weapon. JSM is a better weapon for fighter aircraft, as it's sized to fit in the F-35 internal bay.




Juramentado -> RE: SECDEF Talks About New Frigate to Follow LCS (3/3/2014 8:06:27 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Apocal


The Hoover wasn't rated to carry Mavericks until extremely late in its service life, I want to say like 2002 or thereabouts. And I never saw a single one launch a strike overland during OEF or OIF, since they were mostly blind to threats and practically defenseless.


Buddy-Lasing for VS-38 (Google Books) Excerpt




orca -> RE: SECDEF Talks About New Frigate to Follow LCS (7/25/2014 2:43:33 AM)

A LCS with some teeth?

http://www.navytimes.com/article/20140724/NEWS04/307240087/LCS-conduct-test-Norwegian-missile

Sorry- just saw someone else posted this




NakedWeasel -> RE: SECDEF Talks About New Frigate to Follow LCS (7/25/2014 8:40:44 PM)

Navy: Cost for newest ship will decline

http://www.military1.com/navy/article/464376-navy-cost-for-newest-ship-will-decline




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
1.40625