RE: Double Standards

RE: Double Standards (Full Version)

All Forums >> [General] >> General Discussion

Message

Rising-Sun -> RE: Double Standards (3/4/2014 4:33:22 PM)
Maybe some moderators dont like politics. We dont want to start a war in General either, there already alot of people out there are opposite of everything.

undercovergeek -> RE: Double Standards (3/4/2014 4:43:38 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: warspite1 quote: ORIGINAL: warspite1 quote: ORIGINAL: undercovergeek not one of the 'back-patting, we're all best buddies brigade' on here going to mention the total arseholey behaviour of someone who went over to a sub forum and stamped his feet like a little girl, shouted rude words in the playground until a grown up came and closed the well-mannered, well discussed thread because he thought he should be allowed to do it and wasnt happy other children got to play with their toys? warspite1 Who dat den? warspite1 Ah..you mean me? [:D] Well, like most things in life, things are actually not always as simple as they seem. You clearly have a version of events based on what you read and what you want to play along with - fine, entirely up to you - I have the version I know to be true. Suffice to say, that what transpired yesterday was not all it seemed. [image]http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/800x600q90/543/3i1j.jpg[/image]

Chickenboy -> RE: Double Standards (3/4/2014 4:52:25 PM)
Hey...she's kinda cute. Warspite1-will you do the necessary 'legwork' to put her where she belongs? Onto the "Australian Beauties" thread? [8D]

Terminus -> RE: Double Standards (3/4/2014 4:54:52 PM)
Dude, that's Lindsay Lohan. Ick.

warspite1 -> RE: Double Standards (3/4/2014 4:58:19 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Chickenboy Hey...she's kinda cute. Warspite1-will you do the necessary 'legwork' to put her where she belongs? Onto the "Australian Beauties" thread? [8D] warspite1 Sure, will do. Suffice to say they will be pictures of young Lindsay and not the current, spaced out, sorely troubled and rather badly ageing-thanks-to-the-effects-of-drugs version.

warspite1 -> RE: Double Standards (3/4/2014 4:59:54 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: undercovergeek quote: ORIGINAL: warspite1 quote: ORIGINAL: warspite1 quote: ORIGINAL: undercovergeek not one of the 'back-patting, we're all best buddies brigade' on here going to mention the total arseholey behaviour of someone who went over to a sub forum and stamped his feet like a little girl, shouted rude words in the playground until a grown up came and closed the well-mannered, well discussed thread because he thought he should be allowed to do it and wasnt happy other children got to play with their toys? warspite1 Who dat den? warspite1 Ah..you mean me? [:D] Well, like most things in life, things are actually not always as simple as they seem. You clearly have a version of events based on what you read and what you want to play along with - fine, entirely up to you - I have the version I know to be true. Suffice to say, that what transpired yesterday was not all it seemed. [image]http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/800x600q90/543/3i1j.jpg[/image] warspite1 Hey! is anyone going to call out the arseholey behaviour of undercovergeek posting pictures of Lohan on this thread? Ick, as Terminus would quite rightly say.

warspite1 -> RE: Double Standards (3/4/2014 5:00:41 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: warspite1 quote: ORIGINAL: undercovergeek quote: ORIGINAL: warspite1 quote: ORIGINAL: warspite1 quote: ORIGINAL: undercovergeek not one of the 'back-patting, we're all best buddies brigade' on here going to mention the total arseholey behaviour of someone who went over to a sub forum and stamped his feet like a little girl, shouted rude words in the playground until a grown up came and closed the well-mannered, well discussed thread because he thought he should be allowed to do it and wasnt happy other children got to play with their toys? warspite1 Who dat den? warspite1 Ah..you mean me? [:D] Well, like most things in life, things are actually not always as simple as they seem. You clearly have a version of events based on what you read and what you want to play along with - fine, entirely up to you - I have the version I know to be true. Suffice to say, that what transpired yesterday was not all it seemed. [image]http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/800x600q90/543/3i1j.jpg[/image] warspite1 Hey! is anyone going to call out the arseholey behaviour of undercovergeek posting pictures of Lohan on this thread? Ick, as Terminus would quite rightly say. vonRocko +1

vonRocko -> RE: Double Standards (3/4/2014 5:09:27 PM)
+1 indeed! I have the right to not be subjected to skanky whores on this forum. I better pm Eric. [sm=character0229.gif]

warspite1 -> RE: Double Standards (3/4/2014 5:12:39 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: vonRocko +1 indeed! I have the right to not be subjected to skanky whores on this forum. I better pm Eric. [sm=character0229.gif] warspite1 Good man VR - do your duty. let's make this a Lohan free zone. I am not happy about her inclusion - infact... fetch me my angry sailor hat - I'm madder than I've ever been [:@] [sm=character0085.gif]

obvert -> RE: Double Standards (3/4/2014 6:32:07 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: warspite1 quote: ORIGINAL: warspite1 quote: ORIGINAL: undercovergeek not one of the 'back-patting, we're all best buddies brigade' on here going to mention the total arseholey behaviour of someone who went over to a sub forum and stamped his feet like a little girl, shouted rude words in the playground until a grown up came and closed the well-mannered, well discussed thread because he thought he should be allowed to do it and wasnt happy other children got to play with their toys? warspite1 Who dat den? warspite1 Ah..you mean me? [:D] Well, like most things in life, things are actually not always as simple as they seem. You clearly have a version of events based on what you read and what you want to play along with - fine, entirely up to you - I have the version I know to be true. Suffice to say, that what transpired yesterday was not all it seemed. So what was it?

warspite1 -> RE: Double Standards (3/4/2014 7:15:41 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: obvert quote: ORIGINAL: warspite1 quote: ORIGINAL: warspite1 quote: ORIGINAL: undercovergeek not one of the 'back-patting, we're all best buddies brigade' on here going to mention the total arseholey behaviour of someone who went over to a sub forum and stamped his feet like a little girl, shouted rude words in the playground until a grown up came and closed the well-mannered, well discussed thread because he thought he should be allowed to do it and wasnt happy other children got to play with their toys? warspite1 Who dat den? warspite1 Ah..you mean me? [:D] Well, like most things in life, things are actually not always as simple as they seem. You clearly have a version of events based on what you read and what you want to play along with - fine, entirely up to you - I have the version I know to be true. Suffice to say, that what transpired yesterday was not all it seemed. So what was it? warspite1 No. No point prolonging the unpleasantness. The other side has let it go - and so will I. Besides, we've seen what happens when arguments get out of control - we end up with pictures of Lindsay Lohan... And that's just not acceptable.

Chickenboy -> RE: Double Standards (3/4/2014 7:51:56 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Terminus Dude, that's Lindsay Lohan. Ick. That's funny there. I had no idea. She's certainly not improved with age (and drug / alcohol abuse)...[:-]

Orm -> RE: Double Standards (3/4/2014 7:53:17 PM)
I am not up to date on what happens in the celebrity world. So why the concern with pictures of Lindsay Lohan?

Chickenboy -> RE: Double Standards (3/4/2014 7:54:40 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: warspite1 quote: ORIGINAL: warspite1 quote: ORIGINAL: undercovergeek quote: ORIGINAL: warspite1 quote: ORIGINAL: warspite1 quote: ORIGINAL: undercovergeek not one of the 'back-patting, we're all best buddies brigade' on here going to mention the total arseholey behaviour of someone who went over to a sub forum and stamped his feet like a little girl, shouted rude words in the playground until a grown up came and closed the well-mannered, well discussed thread because he thought he should be allowed to do it and wasnt happy other children got to play with their toys? warspite1 Who dat den? warspite1 Ah..you mean me? [:D] Well, like most things in life, things are actually not always as simple as they seem. You clearly have a version of events based on what you read and what you want to play along with - fine, entirely up to you - I have the version I know to be true. Suffice to say, that what transpired yesterday was not all it seemed. [image]http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/800x600q90/543/3i1j.jpg[/image] warspite1 Hey! is anyone going to call out the arseholey behaviour of undercovergeek posting pictures of Lohan on this thread? Ick, as Terminus would quite rightly say. Soojan +1 I like Lindsey Lohan. They are my friend.

warspite1 -> RE: Double Standards (3/4/2014 7:55:49 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Orm I am not up to date on what happens in the celebrity world. So why the concern with pictures of Lindsay Lohan? warspite1 Just a joke mate. She was relatively fit as a youngster - but then drink and drugs have left her old before her time... shame [:(]

warspite1 -> RE: Double Standards (3/4/2014 7:56:45 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Chickenboy quote: ORIGINAL: warspite1 quote: ORIGINAL: warspite1 quote: ORIGINAL: undercovergeek quote: ORIGINAL: warspite1 quote: ORIGINAL: warspite1 quote: ORIGINAL: undercovergeek not one of the 'back-patting, we're all best buddies brigade' on here going to mention the total arseholey behaviour of someone who went over to a sub forum and stamped his feet like a little girl, shouted rude words in the playground until a grown up came and closed the well-mannered, well discussed thread because he thought he should be allowed to do it and wasnt happy other children got to play with their toys? warspite1 Who dat den? warspite1 Ah..you mean me? [:D] Well, like most things in life, things are actually not always as simple as they seem. You clearly have a version of events based on what you read and what you want to play along with - fine, entirely up to you - I have the version I know to be true. Suffice to say, that what transpired yesterday was not all it seemed. [image]http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/800x600q90/543/3i1j.jpg[/image] warspite1 Hey! is anyone going to call out the arseholey behaviour of undercovergeek posting pictures of Lohan on this thread? Ick, as Terminus would quite rightly say. Soojan +1 I like Lindsey Lohan. They are my friend. warspite1 [:)]

Orm -> RE: Double Standards (3/4/2014 8:00:39 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: warspite1 quote: ORIGINAL: Orm I am not up to date on what happens in the celebrity world. So why the concern with pictures of Lindsay Lohan? warspite1 Just a joke mate. She was relatively fit as a youngster - but then drink and drugs have left her old before her time... shame [:(] Ok. Thank you for explaining. ---- I do not understand why some become even more famous and get paid more after they use drugs. And others seem to become almost hated. But that I do not understand it could be because I do not understand either the celebrity world nor the drug world.

warspite1 -> RE: Double Standards (3/4/2014 8:06:46 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Orm quote: ORIGINAL: warspite1 quote: ORIGINAL: Orm I am not up to date on what happens in the celebrity world. So why the concern with pictures of Lindsay Lohan? warspite1 Just a joke mate. She was relatively fit as a youngster - but then drink and drugs have left her old before her time... shame [:(] Ok. Thank you for explaining. ---- I do not understand why some become even more famous and get paid more after they use drugs. And others seem to become almost hated. But that I do not understand it could be because I do not understand either the celebrity world nor the drug world. warspite1 I suppose its like car crash T.V. People are fascinated by the rich and famous decent into oblivion.

Orm -> RE: Double Standards (3/4/2014 8:08:00 PM)
So you could say it is some kind of double standard? [;)]

warspite1 -> RE: Double Standards (3/4/2014 8:10:43 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Orm So you could say it is some kind of double standard? [;)] soojan I like doubles standard. It is my friend. But not friend like Mr Wilkes from local pet stores who make special friends in car after work.

Orm -> RE: Double Standards (3/4/2014 8:16:10 PM)
OrmSpam: Buy Friends double standard at Friends store.

barkman44 -> RE: Double Standards (3/4/2014 11:44:28 PM)
try Maddogdrivethru practically anything goes there. But be warned don't mention being from the south or anything favorable about the south in the Civil War,there's somebody there who can be really obnoxious on the subject!

Icemania -> RE: Double Standards (3/6/2014 12:50:27 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Darkspire IMO there are to many Indians and not enough chiefs, what is needed on here are community moderators, long term users that can keep an eye on things and step in when needed. The amount of times I have seen a good discussion thread locked is beyond a joke, a community moderator can see if a thread has become personal and deal with it accordingly or let it ride if it is just a discussion. Darkspire +10000 Erik / Ian ... this is what every other half-decent forum does when it gets too large to possibly handle ... and this would also ensure you have more time available as the Moderators can get you involved only where needed.

Icemania -> RE: Double Standards (3/6/2014 1:43:32 PM)
BTW I nominate Darkspire for the Distant Worlds Forum! [sm=00000028.gif]

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3]

Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

6.203125