Artillery: Some thoughts (Full Version)

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Flashpoint Campaigns Series



Message

IronMikeGolf -> Artillery: Some thoughts (4/30/2014 1:15:05 PM)

Disclaimer: what follows is based upon my knowledge and experience of US Army doctrine from the early 80's through mid 90's.

Since we wear hats at different levels of command simultaneously when playing FPRS, it can be challenging to tell where the combined knowledge of the fight at all those levels ends and where gimmicks of the game engine begin.

Here's an example: I have a PACT tank company or MRC halted while breaching an obstacle. The obstacle/minefield is covered by direct fire and the breaching unit is being attritted. If I can finish it off, the obstacle/minefield will remain unbreached. This is a good opportunity to use ICM. I've already fired some ICM missions, so I page through my firing batteries to see who has ammo, select that battery and order the barrage.

At first blush, all seems fine. I am just wearing some more hats: Company Fire Support Team, maneuver Bn Fire Support Officer (maybe), direct support Arty Bn command post (on the DS Bn FO net and that's a maybe), and Firing Battery FDC. Just another mission.

Except, the relationships between maneuver units and fire support is, I think, over simplified and results in missions being fired too quickly, in some cases.

Direct Support: maneuver commander controls the supporting fires. Arty Bns support Brigades. Batteries support maneuver (armor and infantry) battalions.

General Support: fire support commander controls the arty fires. This could be the art bn that supports a maneuver brigade that is currently in reserve or could be a corps level asset parceled out to a division.

General Support Reinforcing: fire support commander controls the reinforcing fires. These are tubes added to another fire mission.

Dedicated Battery: this is what is called "Direct Support" in the game (once it gets fixed).

The point I am making is that the response time for a fire mission depends a lot on the relationship between who's calling the mission and who's firing it. For this time period (mid to late 80's), a mission being fired by a battery in direct support of another maneuver battalion takes longer than the battery in direct support. And that takes longer than the maneuver bn's mortar plt.

To model this more accurately, we'd need to be able to tag a battery as supporting a specific line battalion and then adjust response times.

Also, each battery has an FDC. It's not at the Arty Bn CP.

What does the sim do when the FDC tracks are destroyed? Does it take longer for a battery to fire a mission?




trebcourie -> RE: Artillery: Some thoughts (5/2/2014 6:12:36 PM)

Good points. Arty is *very* responsive in this game. On one hand I'm okay with it to keep with the somewhat abstract nature of this game, but...



CapnDarwin -> RE: Artillery: Some thoughts (5/2/2014 7:59:29 PM)

We can dial that down a bit for 2.04. [:D] There are a number of arty based improvements we want to do for the new game engine (2.1). Hopefully we can fold in some of the stuff above along with the list we have already (some of which hits points above).



IronMikeGolf -> RE: Artillery: Some thoughts (5/2/2014 8:39:34 PM)

Cool! I don't know when you guys are declaring open season on the Good Idea Fairy for 2.04......

I am gonna play around with some DB stuff next. I think the ammo levels for M2/M3 need tweaked. TOW, 25mm, and 7.62 are different for M2 vs M3 (M3 carries more) and both platforms carry more than just the two missiles in the launcher. Also, mech inf needs another Dragon tracker. Should be more like 4 men, 2 trackers, 8 rds. For mech, M2's would have 2 TOWs in the launcher, and the 5 tube racks in the back would have 3 TOW and 2 Dragon, typically. METT-T driven, of course. M3's would carry 10 TOWs in the back.



CapnDarwin -> RE: Artillery: Some thoughts (5/2/2014 8:54:52 PM)

Iron Mike, for missiles in box launchers/rails the ammo count is what can fire from those launchers. The ammo counts being summed takes into account a chance to fire beyond the ready rounds (slim). To basically fire more, the unit needs to do a R&R to reload. Something better done out of direct fire combat.

This will all be more clear once I get the 4th mod guide on data editing done. You can definitely edit away with the user databases. I would suggest making a copy of the user and giving it a new name and also matching the name in the National tab of spreadsheet (near the bottom).



WABAC -> RE: Artillery: Some thoughts (5/3/2014 2:35:38 AM)

Will the mod 4 guide include information on how to create new warheads/rounds?

My life just won't be complete without the 5 inch HVAR (AKA Holy Moses)in my inventory. [:D]



CapnDarwin -> RE: Artillery: Some thoughts (5/3/2014 3:01:18 AM)

It will explain how to rate something like that for a one of the values (AP, HEAT, Area, AD). The HVAR would have a SA value of 11 if that helps.



SwampYankee68 -> RE: Artillery: Some thoughts (5/3/2014 1:38:00 PM)

I had the same impression with artillery response times in Command Ops, so I just let the AI subordinates handle it with some exceptions. It made me feel less "gamey". I think RS does it better, but I do share Iron Mike's concerns.



Mad Russian -> RE: Artillery: Some thoughts (5/5/2014 12:48:06 PM)

Artillery is high on the list of 'touch up' items. We know that there are blemishes in FPC. It was either give it you guys as is or release it 5 years from now.

Keep reporting what you think is wrong and how you think it should be.

Good Hunting.

MR



pzgndr -> RE: Artillery: Some thoughts (5/9/2014 3:38:24 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Mad Russian

Artillery is high on the list of 'touch up' items.


Being able to set TRPs and adjust priority fires during a scenario would be good. But this was 1980s U.S. artillery doctrine so the game could better mimic what was done back in the day. I'm no expert to suggest how the other nations did it.

As the game moves forward, this (artillery) and other areas could be researched to better capture subtle and not-so-subtle differences between the NATO countries and Warsaw Pact countries over different time periods (ie, 1970s "Active Defense" doctrine vs 1980s "AirLand Battle" doctrine, etc.) I mean, there were significant doctrinal changes going on and not just equipment and other TO&E changes. If the game series can capture all this and not simply bang-to-fit the current game mechanics (which are pretty good for a 1980s conflict) into other time periods and/or venues, then that would be outstanding. I know some folks have asked about taking this to Middle East, Viet Nam, WWII, Korea, etc., but be cautious. Keep it accurate and realistic for each side (and the AI) in different conflicts, make adjustments as necessary.



Mad Russian -> RE: Artillery: Some thoughts (5/9/2014 9:02:10 PM)

You can set TRP's now.

Good Hunting.

MR



WABAC -> RE: Artillery: Some thoughts (5/10/2014 7:55:20 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Mad Russian

You can set TRP's now.

Good Hunting.

MR


Ummm,

I have to ask . . .

What is a TRP please?



Clod100_slith -> RE: Artillery: Some thoughts (5/10/2014 9:07:21 PM)

Target Reference Point

2-69. A target reference point (TRP) is an easily recognizable point on the ground, such as a building or a road junction, used in conjunction with engagement areas and sectors of fire to initiate, distribute, and control fires. A TRP may be a natural terrain feature, a manmade artifact, such as a building, or a marker emplaced by the unit. Maneuver leaders at battalion and below designate TRPs to define unit or individual sectors of fire and observation, usually within an EA. A TRP can also designate the center of an area where the commander plans to rapidly distribute or converge fires. A task force commander designates TRPs for his company teams. Company commanders designate TRPs for their platoons, sections, and, in some cases, individual weapons. Platoon leaders or subordinate leaders may designate additional TRPs for their elements as necessary to control direct and indirect fires. The echelon fire support officer can also designate TRPs as indirect fire targets by using the standard target symbol with letters and numbers. Figure 2-12 depicts the symbol for TRP 032.



Flef -> RE: Artillery: Some thoughts (5/10/2014 9:20:44 PM)

edit:grilled. answered before.



zakblood -> RE: Artillery: Some thoughts (5/10/2014 10:03:50 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Mad Russian

Artillery is high on the list of 'touch up' items. We know that there are blemishes in FPC. It was either give it you guys as is or release it 5 years from now.

Keep reporting what you think is wrong and how you think it should be.

Good Hunting.

MR


i liked it now, christmas comes only once a year, and for me it's fine as it is and glad i didn't have to wait that long for a more perfect game, you can tinker all you like, for as long as you like, but sometimes it's nice to play it as is, then alter as you move along where needed. this is where the sim folk all pull their hair out and the game players snigger.

it's been really nice to see what has altered as the game has progressed / patched etc, all for the better, but if i'd not seen it before some of them, would i have noticed some of the details so much? one set of anti tank shell / missile fired and destroyed a tanks for me is as good as another, if a arty battery fires a few minutes early than it should, i can live with also tbh

if the game crashes every 5 mins then i couldn't and would complain, which it has never done :) so no complaints from me, i know everyone wants something more in a sim, but some of us just like to play now and are more than happy with what you are doing now and the direction of where you are going :)

thanks for the game / sim :)



WABAC -> RE: Artillery: Some thoughts (5/10/2014 11:47:15 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Clod100

Target Reference Point

2-69. A target reference point (TRP) is an easily recognizable point on the ground, such as a building or a road junction, used in conjunction with engagement areas and sectors of fire to initiate, distribute, and control fires. A TRP may be a natural terrain feature, a manmade artifact, such as a building, or a marker emplaced by the unit. Maneuver leaders at battalion and below designate TRPs to define unit or individual sectors of fire and observation, usually within an EA. A TRP can also designate the center of an area where the commander plans to rapidly distribute or converge fires. A task force commander designates TRPs for his company teams. Company commanders designate TRPs for their platoons, sections, and, in some cases, individual weapons. Platoon leaders or subordinate leaders may designate additional TRPs for their elements as necessary to control direct and indirect fires. The echelon fire support officer can also designate TRPs as indirect fire targets by using the standard target symbol with letters and numbers. Figure 2-12 depicts the symbol for TRP 032.



Thank you. If that is what I think it is, it can only be placed by the scenario designer when making the map. And I don't remember seeing any examples of it outside the tutorial.



pzgndr -> RE: Artillery: Some thoughts (5/12/2014 7:47:01 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: WABAC
If that is what I think it is, it can only be placed by the scenario designer when making the map. And I don't remember seeing any examples of it outside the tutorial.


That's kinda what I was getting at when I asked about being able to set & adjust TRPs and priority fires during a scenario...



Killjoy12 -> RE: Artillery: Some thoughts (5/12/2014 9:20:28 PM)

Is there anything special that needs to be done to call down fire on the pre-placed TRP? I'm not quite sure how to take advantage of it.



bayonetbrant -> RE: Artillery: Some thoughts (5/13/2014 2:07:44 PM)

Some MLRS thoughts from a dude who did it for a living for a while:

http://bayonetgames.com/wmlrs.htm



CapnDarwin -> RE: Artillery: Some thoughts (5/13/2014 2:16:10 PM)

Killjoy, no. Selecting the hex will sets the arty to quickly engage the target location.



CapnDarwin -> RE: Artillery: Some thoughts (5/13/2014 2:26:50 PM)

Brant, nice read on the MLRS. Thanks for posting.



Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
0.796875