quote:

ORIGINAL: Cribtop

I recently read Frank's excellent book on Guadalcanal. I was intrigued to read that R Area Air Force float planes, usually Petes, were effective in an anti-PT boat role. Anyone ever tried this in the game?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Erkki

Actually E13A1b and E16A1 have 1 and 2 20mm cannons respectively. Though by the time they become available(unless heavily R&D'd) PT boats are unlikely to be one of the top threats...

quote:

ORIGINAL: Yaab

20mm cannons will not be enough. Seems one hit by 60kg bomb = 20-25 hits by 20mm round. Plus, you need to swamp a PT with fighters to maximise hits and float fighters groups are actually small.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Cribtop

Hmm, this is crying out for someone to test!

PS - Imagine a bombardment TF with float planes set 1/2 to recon the target and 1/2 to close range, low altitude Nav Attack. Could help ward off the PTs.

quote:

ORIGINAL: castor troy

quote:

ORIGINAL: Cribtop

Hmm, this is crying out for someone to test!

PS - Imagine a bombardment TF with float planes set 1/2 to recon the target and 1/2 to close range, low altitude Nav Attack. Could help ward off the PTs.

doesn't night naval movement happen prior to night air attacks? Lol, watched so many thousands of turns of combat replays and I can't tell.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Cribtop

I recently read Frank's excellent book on Guadalcanal. I was intrigued to read that R Area Air Force float planes, usually Petes, were effective in an anti-PT boat role. Anyone ever tried this in the game?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Big B

Actually aircraft weren't very effective in the anti-PT Boat role.
PT Boat combat losses were very low due to direct enemy action in the air or on the surface:

Out of 531 PTs placed in US Navy service, 69 were lost: 5 - destroyed by enemy surface ship gunfire; 1 - rammed by enemy ship; 1 - rammed enemy ship; 1 - enemy aircraft strafing; 4 - enemy bombings; 2 - kamikaze attacks; 5 - enemy shore batteries; 4 - enemy mines; 1 - damaged by enemy fire then destroyed; 2 - lost in transit, tanker torpedoed by enemy. Total: 26 lost by enemy action.

Additional losses: 18 - grounded in enemy waters and destroyed to prevent capture; 3 - destroyed to prevent capture; 3 - destroyed by US aircraft; 2 - destroyed by Australian aircraft; 2 - destroyed by US ships; 1 - destroyed by enemy shore fire or wild shot from US warship; 5 - grounded/destroyed outside enemy waters or in storms; 6 - fire or explosion in port; 3 - collisions. Total: 43 lost by accidents, friendly fire or sea conditions.

PT Boats, Inc.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Cribtop

I recently read Frank's excellent book on Guadalcanal. I was intrigued to read that R Area Air Force float planes, usually Petes, were effective in an anti-PT boat role. Anyone ever tried this in the game?

quote:

ORIGINAL: castor troy

quote:

ORIGINAL: Big B

Actually aircraft weren't very effective in the anti-PT Boat role.
PT Boat combat losses were very low due to direct enemy action in the air or on the surface:

Out of 531 PTs placed in US Navy service, 69 were lost: 5 - destroyed by enemy surface ship gunfire; 1 - rammed by enemy ship; 1 - rammed enemy ship; 1 - enemy aircraft strafing; 4 - enemy bombings; 2 - kamikaze attacks; 5 - enemy shore batteries; 4 - enemy mines; 1 - damaged by enemy fire then destroyed; 2 - lost in transit, tanker torpedoed by enemy. Total: 26 lost by enemy action.

Additional losses: 18 - grounded in enemy waters and destroyed to prevent capture; 3 - destroyed to prevent capture; 3 - destroyed by US aircraft; 2 - destroyed by Australian aircraft; 2 - destroyed by US ships; 1 - destroyed by enemy shore fire or wild shot from US warship; 5 - grounded/destroyed outside enemy waters or in storms; 6 - fire or explosion in port; 3 - collisions. Total: 43 lost by accidents, friendly fire or sea conditions.

PT Boats, Inc.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Cribtop

I recently read Frank's excellent book on Guadalcanal. I was intrigued to read that R Area Air Force float planes, usually Petes, were effective in an anti-PT boat role. Anyone ever tried this in the game?

Like in the discussion aircraft vs subs this is about the same I guess. I doubt that there even were lots of air attacks on PTs. 5 were destroyed by Allied aircraft so how hard would it be to kill a PT in a strafing run? That was friendly fire and hopefully that wasn't that common and still 5 being destroyed. Probably not that much harder than to kill a truck or two? To bring it back to a discussion about the game, it's not unrealistic that Japanese could sink a sub. What makes it unrealistic or better say unhistoric is the use of hundreds of bombers on patrol against enemy subs. That's probably the main difference to what happened in real life. And while Allied fighter aircraft were perfectly suited for strafing attacks, later Japanese fighters that carried more than 120 of 20mm cannon rounds should be perfectly able to harm a PT. As to me, I have never read any reports of Japanese aircraft hunting PT boats though. Guess that would be more like a target of opportunity that would be strafed during an attack on a base when opposition allows it or on the way to/from a target.

I wouldn't want to be on a wooden ship of that size when being strafed by an aircraft. Not even if that aircraft only got 2 x 7.62mm.