Tactical nuclear weapons & SPWAW (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Steel Panthers World At War & Mega Campaigns



Message


RolandRahn_MatrixForum -> Tactical nuclear weapons & SPWAW (3/18/2001 11:03:00 PM)

Hello everybody, I have a question regarding the design of scenarios: Has anyone here ever tried to simulate the effects of a tacticl nuclear bomb in SPWAW? I would like to write two scenarios (nuked beachhead and andvance into a nuked city), but I am not sure how to simulate the effects of a 13(Little Boy)-22(Fat Man) KT nuke (detonated at a height of approx. 500 yards). I tried to simulate it using an area of black beach at ground zero, adding heavy damage to all hexes closer than 20 to ground zero and adding light damage to all hexes closer than 30 to ground zero. The size of maps in SPWAW is large enough to realize such a scenario. I have no experience in scenario design, so any advice is welcomed :) Kind regards, Roland




Greg McCarty -> (3/19/2001 12:42:00 AM)

quote:

Originally posted by RolandRahn: Hello everybody, I have a question regarding the design of scenarios: Has anyone here ever tried to simulate the effects of a tacticl nuclear bomb in SPWAW? I would like to write two scenarios (nuked beachhead and andvance into a nuked city), but I am not sure how to simulate the effects of a 13(Little Boy)-22(Fat Man) KT nuke (detonated at a height of approx. 500 yards). I tried to simulate it using an area of black beach at ground zero, adding heavy damage to all hexes closer than 20 to ground zero and adding light damage to all hexes closer than 30 to ground zero. The size of maps in SPWAW is large enough to realize such a scenario. I have no experience in scenario design, so any advice is welcomed :) Kind regards, Roland
Nukes eh? Clearly, you haven't experienced enough of the (more than sufficient) effects of Nebelwerfers in concentration. :D Extensive property damage (flames, building wreckage, craters) can be added to a map using features of the map editor, but I'm not sure how one would simulate the effects of radiation poisoning on the troops after marching the poor puking Godforsaken fellows into such an environment. ;)




AmmoSgt -> (3/19/2001 12:51:00 AM)

Roland a 13 KT nuke like Hiroshima would pretty much destroy the 80x100 map a mile is 32 hexes IIRC .. your going to pretty much going to have serious significant damage out well over a mile anything that can burn will be burning , the peak mean overpresures from the blast will be causing Immediate casualties out about a mile .. every pebble and twig is going to be hot shrapnel and don't forget visibility is going to be real bad ... set everybodies suppression at 99 and i think the rally vaule on the leaders should be about 2, just 2, talking guys into charging into mushroom clouds is a real tough sell ..it could take a couple of tries, and if a unit has line of site, well , within 3 miles line of site is Toast




RolandRahn_MatrixForum -> (3/19/2001 5:37:00 AM)

quote:

Originally posted by AmmoSgt: Roland a 13 KT nuke like Hiroshima would pretty much destroy the 80x100 map a mile is 32 hexes IIRC .. your going to pretty much going to have serious significant damage out well over a mile anything that can burn will be burning , the peak mean overpresures from the blast will be causing Immediate casualties out about a mile .. every pebble and twig is going to be hot shrapnel and don't forget visibility is going to be real bad ... set everybodies suppression at 99 and i think the rally vaule on the leaders should be about 2, just 2, talking guys into charging into mushroom clouds is a real tough sell ..it could take a couple of tries, and if a unit has line of site, well , within 3 miles line of site is Toast
Hello AmmoSgt, thanks for your opinion about this. I should have been more precise with my original question.... I'm trying to figure out what would be the effects on the *terrain* of a large (100X240?) SPWAW map. The attacking player (US/USMC) would start on the southern edge of the map, the detonation would have taken place in the northern edge (around row number 40) of the map. This leaves 200 hexes from the starting location to the detonation. (= 10000 yards) To prevent any misunderstandings: The detonation would have taken place before the scenario begins :) The scenario would take place in March, 1946 (Operation Coronet, invasion of Honshu) or in November,1945 (Operation Olympic, invasion of Kyushu). The original plan for Olympic did not include the ABomb, but the plan was laid down in mid-1944 by people who where (at that time) not informed about the manhatten project (Nimitz, for example, learned about the bomb in February, 1945). Later, it was suggested to use 3 bombs for each of the corps involved in the initial assault. 1 or 2 bombs (of each of these corps) would be used during the pre-invasion bombardment, the rest would have been used against japanese reserves. This leaves two options for the scenario: A large (100x100) Map with the detonation in it's centre, the US/USMC starting on the edge and assuming that the detonation has taken place at least six-twelve hours earlier. Or a giant (100x240) Map with a detonation that has taken place just a few minutes before the start of the scenario. You suggested that a charge into a mushroom cloud would be difficult. This is true, but in 1945/1946 no one knew exactly how dangerous the radiation and the fallout is. But (nearly) everybody was aware that charging into a japanese held position was very dangerous ;) . Therefore, I think that it would be possible to convince soldiers that they had to hurry to exploit the hole created by the ABomb. For the effects on the Japanese units exposed to the nuclear bomb: It depends on the type of the unit. According to "How to make War" (by James F. Dunnigan): For a 20 KT detonation, a 50 % casualty rate will occur at a distance of - 2714 Meters for troops in the open (~55 Hexes) - 1900 Meters for troops in open earthworks (~40 Hexes) - 1629 Meters for nonarmoured vehicles (~33 Hexes) - 1221 Meters for armoured vehicles (~25 Hexes) - 543 Meters for Heavy structures of concrete (~11 Hexes) Therefore, closer to the point of the detonation there would be no infantry, but some Bunkers (very close to the detonation, there would of course be nothing). The US troops (200 Hexes away) would be either in ships/amphibious vessels or at least in open earthworks. Therefore, they should be unharmed. This would be the interesting aspect in SPWAW: To have a scenario with very bad visibility, an enemy position that is hold by very few bunkers and some enemy infantry racing into the area to prevent you from assaulting the weakened position... So far, I hope that I have researched enough data to design the scenario. However, I simply have no idea how to create the effects of the Blast on the map (the terrain) :confused:. I tried it with black beach, but it looked not very convincing :(. If anybody here has an idea how to create a SPWAW map that includes blast effects from a 20KT-Nuke, please tell them. By the way: I know that the idea of writing a SPWAW scenario involving a tactical nuclear bomb sounds ridicoulus, but after a second look I have so far not found anything that would make it impossible... I anyboby sees something that makes such a SPWAW scenario impossible, please tell me why you think so (I would hate continuing this idea and then learning that is is impossible because of XYZ). :)




Drake -> (3/19/2001 6:13:00 AM)

I dont see any reason this would be impossible. I could see a number of ways a map like this could be done. Your first step would be to get some pictures of a real blast site. Like one of the two japanise cities one was used on.




Anthony_MatrixForum -> (3/19/2001 9:01:00 AM)

When visiting Hiroshima a few years back, I visited the peace memorial there - very powerful stuff. One thing that stuck me was the overwhemling number of wooden buildings - the scale model of the city at the time of the bombing shows only ~10 stone/concreate buildings (in the multiple sqaure kms of city) - most of which with stood the blast to a suprising degree. Of course the wooden buildings and their occupants didn't fare so well. The locals said that most buildings where wooden until post WWII. It would seem to me that any map of a post - nuked city in WWII japan would be very flat, with just a few stone structures. Anthony




AmmoSgt -> (3/19/2001 12:12:00 PM)

Ok hmm no reason it would be impossible... the part that is unclear is the 500m burst height .. usually it is more an intended effect statement like surface burst.. low air burst ( so you get a mach stem shock wave and little or no ground contact to limit fallout) or High air burst where you get great coverage but at lower effect and the blast wave is more from above instead of racing along the ground like a mach stem.wave... But Basically if it is not a ground burst for cratering and limiting the blast damage , but with 1000 times the fallout , then there shouldn't be a big smking hole in the map stone briges probably intact but iffy.. trees gone blasted or burned anything short of a solid stone bulding would be rough and that inculdes any roads or what used to be roads .. most the pictures of Hiroshima are after two weeks of bulldozers clearing the streets ..but even out in the country the roads are going to be litters with everything that was blown around by the blast and so much stuff gets sucked up in the cloud right away even with an airburst that stuff falls for quite a while and your usual traffic patterns can be distrupted




Kluckenbill -> (3/20/2001 11:04:00 AM)

I have an interesting book titled "The Invasion of Japan - Alternative to the Bomb" by John Skates. Apparently Marshall and others were planning to use nukes to support the invasion of Operation Olympic. The book doesn't indicate any detailed planning, but it was felt that casualties from radiation would be much less than those from fighting through fortified Japanese lines.




USMCGrunt -> (3/20/2001 12:16:00 PM)

quote:

Originally posted by Kluckenbill: I have an interesting book titled "The Invasion of Japan - Alternative to the Bomb" by John Skates. Apparently Marshall and others were planning to use nukes to support the invasion of Operation Olympic. The book doesn't indicate any detailed planning, but it was felt that casualties from radiation would be much less than those from fighting through fortified Japanese lines.
One thing to keep in mind Kluckenbill, was that very little was known about the effects of radiation exposure until the Army began systematic testing in the 1950's. While at the time, it may have been thought that casualties would have been light, more recent evidence supports that a considerable number of troops would be killed or rendered completely uneffective if used in a nuclear battlefield of that type.




Rhodan -> (3/20/2001 11:13:00 PM)

I was under the impression that nuclear devices were seen as a strategic tool and therefor not available to commanders in the field. Rho




Kluckenbill -> (3/21/2001 12:11:00 AM)

quote:

Originally posted by USMCGrunt: One thing to keep in mind Kluckenbill, was that very little was known about the effects of radiation exposure until the Army began systematic testing in the 1950's. While at the time, it may have been thought that casualties would have been light, more recent evidence supports that a considerable number of troops would be killed or rendered completely uneffective if used in a nuclear battlefield of that type.
You're probably right. I wasn't saying that I thought it was a good idea, only that the US leadership thought so in 1945.




john g -> (3/21/2001 5:31:00 AM)

quote:

Originally posted by Rhodan: I was under the impression that nuclear devices were seen as a strategic tool and therefor not available to commanders in the field. Rho
The documents I have seen show that there was a plan to use two nukes, one on each side of the landing beaches to stop lateral reinforcement of the beach defenses. I think that was the plan that McArthur supported, just as he later wanted to use nukes in Korea. As long as troops are not moved into the impact zone for at least a week radiation falls off to tolerable levels. Remember these are weapons in the 10k ton range. If we were talking about city buster 20 megaton weapons you could just flush the map. The WWII era bombs were only about twice the tonnage of explosives as one of the British 1000 bomber raids. thanks, John.




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
0.8125