Chris21wen -> RE: Buying back destroyed unrestricted ground units (8/12/2014 7:40:03 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: General Patton quote:
ORIGINAL: Chris H quote:
ORIGINAL: General Patton quote:
ORIGINAL: seille 1 PP would be ok with me. In my game it varies depending on the strength the unit arrives. But imho it would be the best not to be forced to pay anything for these units. Sometimes the cost is more, depending on the strength at the time of appearance. And yes, the unit should come back under the same HQ it was under when destroyed. Its been like this for as long as I can remember....[&:]...GP Why should it? Destroyed units will normally be re-formed somewhere in blighty e.g. they depot base. For instance the 1st Manchester were captured at Singapore. They were reformed (from the 6th Bn) in 1942 back in England and landed on D-day, obviously no longer part of the 2nd Malay Bde. The 2nd Loyal Rgt also capture at Singas reformed in in 1942 and reassigned to the 20th Ind Bde in Italy. I could go on but it emphasis the point that units would not normal be part of their original organisation, actually highly unlikely. Whether or not you should have to pay the full PPs for redeploying the units is a different thing altogether. Well maybe some of these units should not be able to be purchased if they were rebuilt and used in other theaters....GP After reforming both of these units saw active service late 1944 onwards so from approx. that date, then yes, they should be withdrawn. My argument is not about the specific units it's about the buying back of units destroyed. They would have been scratched from their original organisation, with other available (if any) units taking there place. If the units were indeed reformed then they would enter at they depots and enter the strategic reserve until reassigned as the need arouse.
|
|
|
|