Bullwinkle58 -> RE: WITP or WITP:AE (12/5/2014 12:18:51 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Chuck B. Hi - I was about to ask the same/similar question and I'm happy to have found this thread. One additional question: Is there a considerable difference in complexity between the two games? My feeling is that I would like to get into the game but that the complexity (and required time) will be the biggest hurdle for me. So if there is a considerable difference when it comes to complexity (I assume there isn't), that would make a difference to me. Also, I read somewhere (I think on the WitW forum) that WitP came with a tutorial and that the AE doesn't - again, for me getting into the game would be important. Thanks! I said that on the WitW forum. It's true that WITP came with a tutorial and AE was supposed to have one, but it was never done. But the WITP one was basic; I played it once with the manual open and never again. Took about thirty minutes. So you're not missing much. AE's manual is far better. And there are video tutorials for AE done by expert players. As well as many forum threads about how to get started, and several economic primers for Japanese players, and at least one very good "newbie" AAR that takes an Allied player through the first weeks of the grand campaign. And there's the forum here for ad hoc questions, although by now most of the basic ones have been asked and answered scores of times and are in the forum archives. AE is a tough learning curve, but it's doable. It's a fun doable. There are small scenarios to help break you in. Few players start with the grand campaign and last very long. But there's no hurry. AE is a multi-year time investment. There's no other game alive that takes as long to play. Even a GC against the AI takes many real time months. A PBEM game will be years. Few wargamers want that. But for those who do there's AE. Edit: like your avatar. I miss C & H to this day.
|
|
|
|