RE: Naval and Defense News (Full Version)

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series



Message


redcoat -> RE: Naval and Defense News (3/24/2016 1:32:55 PM)


Philippines selects Lynx Wildcat for ASW mission

quote:

The Philippines has selected the AgustaWestland AW159 Lynx Wildcat to fulfil its anti-submarine warfare (ASW) helicopter requirement, IHS Jane's has learned.

The Philippine Department of National Defense (DND) has awarded the Anglo-Italian manufacturer a contract for PHP5.3 billion (USD114 million) under its Anti-Submarine Helicopter Acquisition Project for the Philippine Navy, according to a DND Notice of Award document seen by IHS Jane's on 23 March.

While the document gives no details on the helicopter type or numbers, AgustaWestland had previously announced that it was bidding two AW159s for the requirement.

The news of the contract award comes a month after AgustaWestland officials said they were optimistic it would be awarded "very soon", though the company told IHS Jane's it is unable to comment on the contract award at this time.

The competition to provide the Philippine Navy with an airborne ASW capability, which it currently lacks, was launched by the DND in September 2014. It is understood that Airbus Helicopters and its local partner PT Dirgantara Indonesia expressed interest in bidding the AS565 Panther for the programme, though it was not confirmed if a formal bid was entered, while Bell Helicopter, NHIndustries, and Sikorsky were also reported to have shown interest with the 412EP, NH90, and S-70B Seahawk respectively.

In the ASW role the AW159 can be configured to carry active dipping sonar (ADS), sonobuoys, and torpedoes, while for the anti-surface warfare role it can be armed with anti-ship missiles, rockets, and guns. Once in Philippine Navy service, the AW159s are expected to be deployed aboard the navy's Pilar (Hamilton and Hero)-class frigates BRP Gregorio Del Pilar and BRP Ramon Alcaraz, which were acquired from the US Coast Guard in 2012 and 2013.


IHS Jane's online




jtoatoktoe -> RE: Naval and Defense News (3/24/2016 2:27:01 PM)

B-52H getting swap-able new internal launcher.

http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htairfo/articles/20160324.aspx

quote:


Enables them to carry satellite guided munitions in the internal weapons bay for the first time.

The new rotary launcher, six of which are to be delivered in April 2016, is going to be transferable between aircraft. Thanks to this, even though only 44 of these modified launchers are being purchased they will be available for use by all 76 aircraft as needed.

So far the launcher is able to carry 8 Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM) smart bombs. Future improvements of the launcher are expected to make it able to carry JASSM (Joint Air-to-Surface Stand Off Missile) cruise missiles and MALDs (Miniature Air Launched Decoy) decoy and jammer missiles.




Hongjian -> RE: Naval and Defense News (3/24/2016 8:00:24 PM)

http://www.cannews.com.cn/2016/0324/150690.shtml

According to this report, China's Deep Ocean Comprehensive Support Base (深海综合保障基地) has received the funding needed and is included in the next 5 year plan.

Information about this concept:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JJc1OTsW1_k

Pretty much a floating island base. CMANO already has one as a speculative unit included in the DB for the US. Seems like China will actually receive one for real sometime in the future.




Dysta -> RE: Naval and Defense News (3/24/2016 8:27:02 PM)

Hongjian, take a look at this news as well, it's in DB3000 update thread: http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/fb.asp?m=4050495




Hongjian -> RE: Naval and Defense News (3/25/2016 11:00:39 AM)

http://www.janes.com/article/59003/imagery-suggests-china-has-deployed-yj-62-anti-ship-missiles-to-woody-island


quote:

Imagery suggests China has deployed YJ-62 anti-ship missiles to Woody Island

Key Points
-Recent imagery suggests China has deployed YJ-62 ASCMs to Woody Island in the Paracels
-The deployment potentially allows China to target any vessel within 400 km of Woody Island
-Recent imagery suggests China has significantly enhanced its military capabilities in the South China Sea by deploying the land-based version of the 400 km-range YJ-62 anti-ship cruise missile (ASCM) to Woody Island in the Paracel Islands.

Posted on 20 March 2016 on the popular Weibo blog, the image of a launching YJ-62 ASCM is consistent with photos copied from one of the many monthly Chinese military magazines that appear on Chinese military issue web pages. The image of the launching ASCM also shows a radar dome that the Chinese blogger makes a strong case for being on Woody Island.

The China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation (CASIC) YJ-62 was likely deployed at about the same time the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile (SAM) system was first detected on the island in February 2016.

A land-based version of the YJ-62 has been deployed by the Coastal Defence troops of the People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) since about 2008. Three YJ-62 ASCMs are carried on a CASIC-Sanjiang transporter-erector-launcher (TEL).

First seen in model form in 2006 under its export designation C-602, the YJ-62 also arms the Type 052C destroyer launched in 2003. Chinese brochures credit the C-602 with a range of 280 km, while the version in service with the PLAN is estimated to have at least a 400 km range.

The anti-ship version of the YJ-62 is cued by long-range radar or data from aircraft or satellites, then uses an internal nose-mounted radar for terminal guidance.

At the 2012 Zhuhai Airshow CASIC introduced the 290 km-range CM-602G land-attack variant, which has a 480 kg warhead as opposed to the 300 kg warhead carried by the C-602.


The part talking about the range difference between the export C-602 and PLAN-deployed YJ-62 is interesting and well within commom practice: Export cruise missiles are subject to the 300km range limitation as set by the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR), while domestic variants are not subject to it. The 400km number is well within the realms of possibility and even a bit too short-ranged compared to the rumors in the Chinese military watcher's forums (about 600km range - it is a big missile, after all).

The images in question:
[image]http://i64.tinypic.com/ae7dwz.jpg[/image]
[image]http://i67.tinypic.com/2rop6q0.jpg[/image]

And when all major island bases would have the same armaments (yellow for 200km HQ-9 and white for 400km YJ-62 AShM):
[image]http://i63.tinypic.com/2yw5rm1.jpg[/image]




xavierv -> RE: Naval and Defense News (3/26/2016 10:31:00 AM)

Exclusive: First Image of the Lockheed Martin LRASM Top Side Launcher
quote:

Lockheed Martin supplied Navy Recognition with the first image showing a deck-mounted quadruple Long Range Anti-Ship Missile (LRASM) launcher. According to our source, this "top side" launcher graphic is a notional concept that could be used on an appropriately sized surface vessel, such as the Arleigh Burke class (DDG 51) or Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) classes.

more and pic at the link: http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=3761




xavierv -> RE: Naval and Defense News (3/26/2016 11:12:36 AM)

Russia to Deploy Bal and Bastion ASM Coastal Batteries on Kuril Islands & Consider Naval Base
[img]http://i.imgur.com/JFVEdKe.jpg[/img]
quote:

The Russian Navy will start a three month-long expedition to islands of the Greater Kuril Ridge in April to study the possibilities of setting up a Pacific Fleet base there, Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu said on Friday. "Pacific Fleet sailors will start a three month-long expedition to islands of the Greater Kuril Ridge in April. Their main goal is to study the possibilities of setting up a Pacific Fleet base there in future," Shoigu said at a meeting of the Defense Ministry’s board.

The defense minister said earlier that Russia would deploy Bal and Bastion coastal defense missile systems and new-generation Eleron-3 unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) on the Kuril Islands in 2016.

http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=3762




Hongjian -> RE: Naval and Defense News (3/26/2016 11:55:23 AM)

http://www.cannews.com.cn/2016/0324/150665.shtml

[image]http://i66.tinypic.com/ml1c7m.jpg[/image]

According to this report, the conformal fueltank for the upcoming MA-60H MPA was successfully tested.

The MA-60H is an armed variant of the MA-60 turboprop liner, itself a development from the Y-7/An-24. The Chinese State Oceanic Administration would operate these MPAs, along with the PLANAF (the armed versions).

[image]http://i64.tinypic.com/308b4nr.jpg[/image]




redcoat -> RE: Naval and Defense News (3/26/2016 12:59:14 PM)


The USMC is on schedule to deploy F-35Bs to Japan in January 2017

Link


U.S. Naval Forces Europe-Africa establishes new Task Force: CTF 64

Link


The U.S. Congress has been notified of the sale of up to 9 P-8As to the UK

Link




Dysta -> RE: Naval and Defense News (3/26/2016 1:58:49 PM)

Scenario possibility:

http://www.news.com.au/world/sea-shepherd-chases-alleged-chinese-driftnet-fishing-vessel-into-south-china-sea/news-story/866f7362117ccd0a6bd6a4bc3d1125d2

https://youtu.be/HYNa6GKuUb4

https://youtu.be/3NQwWMcy36g

https://youtu.be/3ejENLPau9U

If "Operation Driftnet" gone wrong, then China will have a very good reason to conduct "Anti-Piracy" operation in SCS as well. I hope Sea Shepherd have some military backers if they still wish to survive doing their holy objectives.





Broncepulido -> RE: Naval and Defense News (3/28/2016 7:26:18 PM)

Speculation in new Israeli anti-ship missile, possibly supersonic and ram-jet powered: http://defense-update.com/20160327_israeli_anti_ship_missile.html




redcoat -> RE: Naval and Defense News (3/28/2016 10:14:57 PM)


Japan has activated a radar on the island of Yonaguni close to the disputed Senkaku/Diaoyu islands

Link




AlGrant -> RE: Naval and Defense News (3/28/2016 10:42:14 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: redcoat
Japan has activated a radar on the island of Yonaguni close to the disputed Senkaku/Diaoyu islands
Link

Ooohh got to be a scenario in there somewhere [;)]




Broncepulido -> Encounter between USS Chancellorsville and Chinese Frigate 575 (3/30/2016 2:21:06 PM)

Close encounter between USS Chancellorsville and Chinese Frigate 575. Plain and clear situation, from the New York Times (even show clearly Jane's Fighting Ship's open in the bridge on page 144 in "Chinese Frigates", depending on open source intelligence, possible they've a reconnaissance book with parallel failures to this of US Army recent warplanes reconnaissance guide): http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/31/world/asia/south-china-sea-us-navy.html?_r=0




Dysta -> RE: Encounter between USS Chancellorsville and Chinese Frigate 575 (3/30/2016 2:32:33 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Broncepulido

(even show clearly Jane's Fighting Ship's open in the bridge on page 144 in "Chinese Frigates", depending on open source intelligence, possible they've a reconnaissance book with parallel failures to this of US Army recent warplanes reconnaissance guide)


Even generals can mis-identify the subject if not observing and examining carefully, so I think a book of Janes might not be a life-saver, but definitely helpful for comms and intels.

But I think the US is overplaying the importance of "military transparency", blaming China for the lacks of open info and speculations of their arsenals is one of the biggest reason why western combatants need books to ID what they are.




1Eddie2 -> RE: Encounter between USS Chancellorsville and Chinese Frigate 575 (3/30/2016 3:37:52 PM)

RAF looking at BriteCloud as additional DRFM jammer

http://www.defensenews.com/story/defense/international/europe/2016/03/30/raf-radar-guided-missile-threat/82417308/




Tailhook -> RE: Encounter between USS Chancellorsville and Chinese Frigate 575 (3/30/2016 4:18:43 PM)

I wouldn't read too much into using Janes as opposed to some fancy classified source. It's a pretty reliable source, serves the purpose of initial ID purposes, and can also be freely shown to New York Times reporters.




Dysta -> RE: Encounter between USS Chancellorsville and Chinese Frigate 575 (3/30/2016 4:25:30 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tailhook

I wouldn't read too much into using Janes as opposed to some fancy classified source. It's a pretty reliable source, serves the purpose of initial ID purposes, and can also be freely shown to New York Times reporters.

What it lacks is the computer interface, and the simulation. We all paid good money for it already. [8D]




Dysta -> RE: Encounter between USS Chancellorsville and Chinese Frigate 575 (3/31/2016 7:09:32 PM)

The Eastern Theatre Command of PLA offices has been upgraded to use Linux-based Kylin OS, which is using cloud service for all users, rather than individual systems.

[image]http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e71/mywoem2002/22344703_2016033110095385092100_zpshh6poffa.jpg[/image]

http://military.china.com/important/11132797/20160331/22344703.html (Simplified Chinese)




Dysta -> RE: Encounter between USS Chancellorsville and Chinese Frigate 575 (4/1/2016 4:28:45 AM)

Turkmenistan was recently launched FD-2000 (HQ-9) & KS-1A (HQ-12) SAMs during the military drill. Both are imported from China a year ago.

http://m.get-top-news.com/?i11992063 (Google Translated to English)

[image]http://p3.pstatp.com/large/3e40006be87568b3d22.jpg[/image]

[image]http://p2.pstatp.com/large/3e40006be9d31a3b59f.jpg[/image]




Broncepulido -> RE: Encounter between USS Chancellorsville and Chinese Frigate 575 (4/1/2016 8:02:56 AM)

On 1 April 2016, "Citing multiple issues, the United Kingdom have announced their intention to scrap plans to purchase F-35" [;)] https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/uk-cancels-f-35-purchase/




Dysta -> RE: Encounter between USS Chancellorsville and Chinese Frigate 575 (4/1/2016 8:16:18 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Broncepulido

On 1 April 2016, "Citing multiple issues, the United Kingdom have announced their intention to scrap plans to purchase F-35" [;)] https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/uk-cancels-f-35-purchase/


quote:

In response to this, the Ministry of Defence are now considering purchasing a fleet F-4 Phantoms, painting go faster stripes on the carrier hulls and additional crayon provision.


A bit too much for April's Fool at this line.




Excroat3 -> RE: Naval and Defense News (4/2/2016 5:48:17 AM)

U.S. Army’s new launcher fired AIM-9X and Longbow Hellfire at UAV targets
http://alert5.com/2016/04/02/u-s-armys-new-launcher-fired-aim-9x-and-longbow-hellfire-at-uav-targets/




Hongjian -> RE: Naval and Defense News (4/3/2016 5:58:50 PM)

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/e0ce3744-f70a-11e5-803c-d27c7117d132.html#axzz44mXAy0nL

quote:

China set to deploy longest-range nuclear missile

A new generation of Chinese intercontinental ballistic missiles may come into service as early as this year and will herald a period of rapid nuclear build-up by China, according to experts.
With a 14,500km estimated range, the DF-41 is the first Chinese missile capable of carrying multiple warheads that can strike any part of the US from anywhere in China. Previous missiles have been more limited. The first version of the DF-5, which went into service in 1980, could only hit the northwestern corner of the US from the north-east of China.

“Given the number of real reported tests, it is reasonable to speculate the DF-41 will be deployed to PLA Strategic Rocket Force bases in 2016,” said Richard Fisher, senior fellow at the International Assessment and Strategy Center in Washington.

The news comes as US President Barack Obama prepares to meet China’s President Xi Jinping at a nuclear security summit in Washington on Thursday.

The new missile is the latest in Chinese efforts to challenge US global primacy on a number of fronts. Beijing has been beefing up artificial islands in the South China Sea, while a new generation of weapons, including a stealth fighter, the DF-21D “carrier killer” missile and the 052D class destroyer, are underlining the transformation of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army from a peasant-based land army to a mobile modern fighting force capable of challenging the US in the western Pacific.

While it will be a long time before China achieves nuclear parity with the US and Russia, the world leaders in stockpiled warheads, China clearly sees this as a gap that must be addressed.

Until roughly 2008, according to Mr Fisher, the US believed China had a maximum of 20 nuclear missile warheads. Now, with the advent of a redesigned DF-5 and the new DF-41, both capable of carrying multiple warheads, Mr Fisher says current western estimates for total Chinese warheads are between 200 and 400, with the potential to increase very rapidly.
The US has a stockpile of 4,760 nuclear warheads, according to the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists.

With the ongoing deployment of the DF-5B multiple warhead equipped ICBM, and the new DF-41, “we will see a period of rapid increases in the numbers of China’s nuclear warheads that can reach the United States”, said Mr Fisher.
Tong Zhao, a nuclear security expert at the Carnegie Tsinghua centre in Beijing, said the DF-41 did a number of things that old missiles could not. While the DF-5 is silo-based, the DF-41 has a mobile launcher. The longer range also means it can be deployed anywhere in China, whereas previously China’s nuclear deterrent had to be based in the north-east of the country.
News of the DF-41’s imminent deployment was first reported by Canada-based military journal Kanwa Asian Defence.


Looks like the DF-41 will soon be deployed. The ability to strike the US from anywhere in China due to its range and mobility (and not just when deployed in the north-east) would be a completely new capability for the PLA-RF. It would be like having SSBNs on land - especially since they could now take advantage of the extensive underground great wall network in Central China, and the mountainous regions of provinces like Sichuan (where extensive nuclear production and storage faciliies already exist).




orca -> RE: Naval and Defense News (4/3/2016 6:27:28 PM)

Additional news on Sea Hunter ACTUV: DARPA launched the ACTUV technology demonstrator on 27 January 2016 and conducted tests through February, achieving speeds of 27 knots (31 mph; 50 km/h). To be Christened in April 2016.

http://www.popularmechanics.com/military/navy-ships/a20197/darpas-autonomous-sub-hunting-ship-takes-to-the-sea/
http://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2016/04/02/navy-tests-sub-hunting-drone-ship-vstan-orig.cnn/video/playlists/military-technology/

Also news on the boeing Echo Voyager UUV:
51 ft length
7500 range
50 ton weight
diesel generator plus rechareable batteries
11,000 max depth

http://www.gizmag.com/boeing-echo-voyager/42272/
http://www.wired.com/2016/03/boeings-monstrous-underwater-robot-can-wander-ocean-6-months/

There are a lot of details to be learned but platforms like tjhese are going to be very important in the future and it would be great to add these as hypothetical platforms to the database so we can experiment with them.




mikmykWS -> RE: Naval and Defense News (4/3/2016 6:33:42 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Excroat3

U.S. Army’s new launcher fired AIM-9X and Longbow Hellfire at UAV targets
http://alert5.com/2016/04/02/u-s-armys-new-launcher-fired-aim-9x-and-longbow-hellfire-at-uav-targets/


Still very much a prototype.

http://www.army.mil/article/154848/Multi_Mission_Launcher_Delivery_Ceremony/

Nice idea though!

Mike




mikmykWS -> RE: Naval and Defense News (4/3/2016 6:36:47 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Hongjian

http://www.janes.com/article/59003/imagery-suggests-china-has-deployed-yj-62-anti-ship-missiles-to-woody-island


quote:

Imagery suggests China has deployed YJ-62 anti-ship missiles to Woody Island

Key Points
-Recent imagery suggests China has deployed YJ-62 ASCMs to Woody Island in the Paracels
-The deployment potentially allows China to target any vessel within 400 km of Woody Island
-Recent imagery suggests China has significantly enhanced its military capabilities in the South China Sea by deploying the land-based version of the 400 km-range YJ-62 anti-ship cruise missile (ASCM) to Woody Island in the Paracel Islands.

Posted on 20 March 2016 on the popular Weibo blog, the image of a launching YJ-62 ASCM is consistent with photos copied from one of the many monthly Chinese military magazines that appear on Chinese military issue web pages. The image of the launching ASCM also shows a radar dome that the Chinese blogger makes a strong case for being on Woody Island.

The China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation (CASIC) YJ-62 was likely deployed at about the same time the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile (SAM) system was first detected on the island in February 2016.

A land-based version of the YJ-62 has been deployed by the Coastal Defence troops of the People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) since about 2008. Three YJ-62 ASCMs are carried on a CASIC-Sanjiang transporter-erector-launcher (TEL).

First seen in model form in 2006 under its export designation C-602, the YJ-62 also arms the Type 052C destroyer launched in 2003. Chinese brochures credit the C-602 with a range of 280 km, while the version in service with the PLAN is estimated to have at least a 400 km range.

The anti-ship version of the YJ-62 is cued by long-range radar or data from aircraft or satellites, then uses an internal nose-mounted radar for terminal guidance.

At the 2012 Zhuhai Airshow CASIC introduced the 290 km-range CM-602G land-attack variant, which has a 480 kg warhead as opposed to the 300 kg warhead carried by the C-602.


The part talking about the range difference between the export C-602 and PLAN-deployed YJ-62 is interesting and well within commom practice: Export cruise missiles are subject to the 300km range limitation as set by the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR), while domestic variants are not subject to it. The 400km number is well within the realms of possibility and even a bit too short-ranged compared to the rumors in the Chinese military watcher's forums (about 600km range - it is a big missile, after all).

The images in question:
[image]http://i64.tinypic.com/ae7dwz.jpg[/image]
[image]http://i67.tinypic.com/2rop6q0.jpg[/image]

And when all major island bases would have the same armaments (yellow for 200km HQ-9 and white for 400km YJ-62 AShM):
[image]http://i63.tinypic.com/2yw5rm1.jpg[/image]


Do you know what the radar types on the island are?

Mike




Dysta -> RE: Naval and Defense News (4/3/2016 7:48:45 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mikmyk

Do you know what the radar types on the island are?

Mike

Based on this picture (Woody island):

1, EW Radar (Unknown)
2, Weather Station (Unknown)
3, Possible HQ-9 Battery & Radar System
4, ELINT Antenna/Receiver (possibly from Type 815G ELINT vessel)
5, Possible YJ-62 Battery
6, Radio Communication Antenna (Unknown)

From WikiMapia

[image]http://i67.tinypic.com/2rop6q0.jpg[/image]




Vici Supreme -> RE: Naval and Defense News (4/3/2016 8:47:06 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dysta

Based on this picture (Woody island):

1, EW Radar (Unknown)

Is it possible that this radar site could be a YLC-4 radar?? Some months ago I did a little research for a SCS scenario and compared the radome on Woody Island to known YLC-4 radomes on the Chinese mainland. Diameters were always about the same size. Also the layout of the radar coverage of radars on Hainan Island with a YLC-4 on Woody Island lead me to this conclusion. Of course I could be horribly wrong...




Dysta -> RE: Naval and Defense News (4/3/2016 10:41:32 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Supreme 2.0

Is it possible that this radar site could be a YLC-4 radar?? Some months ago I did a little research for a SCS scenario and compared the radome on Woody Island to known YLC-4 radomes on the Chinese mainland. Diameters were always about the same size. Also the layout of the radar coverage of radars on Hainan Island with a YLC-4 on Woody Island lead me to this conclusion. Of course I could be horribly wrong...

No luck with Chinese sites and forums either.

That approx. 20m diameter of green radome suggest its' for the long-range search radar, consider the smaller white radome can't house a better radar, and the weather station is too open for military purpose. I'm not sure if it's a permanent construction, or the radar inside is replaceable.

But so far, the only temporary solution is to treat it as a normal search radar, like YLC-4 you suggested.




Page: <<   < prev  25 26 [27] 28 29   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
0.90625