(Closed) Soviet Opponent wanted - GC 260 VP 1941

(Closed) Soviet Opponent wanted - GC 260 VP 1941 (Full Version)

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> Opponents Wanted

Message

Peltonx -> (Closed) Soviet Opponent wanted - GC 260 VP 1941 (3/13/2015 11:01:16 AM)
1941 GC Sudden Death or Alt VC260 1.08.2 Server game Locked HQ Support Full FOW House Rules: No Para drops at all. No bombing of air bases more than 3 times a turn (after turn 1) No bombing of HQ's unless stacked with a ground unit No naval invasions before November 1941, none outside the 1939 Soviet borders before January 1943 In addition if Sevastopol is either isolated, or in German hands, none west of the Crimea, which reflects the scope for air/naval interdiction not really reflected in the game. Additional Auto VC: If the Axis player holds Leningrad, Moscow, Voronezh and Rostov concurrently at any time in 1941 he wins an Auto Victory. No need to waste any ones time as we all know the end results based on past games if these cities fall in 1941. Optional Rules Setup: Normal Blizzard Rules Random Weather No 1-1 = 2-1 PM if your interested

loki100 -> RE: GC sudden death or 260 VP 1941 Soviet Opponent wanted (3/13/2015 11:12:59 AM)
so you really are looking for a completely one sided game?

Peltonx -> RE: GC sudden death or 260 VP 1941 Soviet Opponent wanted (3/13/2015 12:53:34 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: loki100 so you really are looking for a completely one sided game? Interesting statement dude. For us low IQ people what do you mean, your clearly 2x my IQ as I don't understand your statement. I have played the best of the best and have not backed down from playing anyone. The options are what people consider standard now. no 1v1=2v1 NO mild blizzard. Still not sure about the non random, I am leaning for a random weather vs a good SHC player and non-random vs someone new as I just want to get it over with asap. Some people want mild blizzard and +1 attack, but that's to over powered for SHC. I believe no 1v1=2v1 and standard blizzard is the best balance. non random or random I don't really care at this point. I only play server based games because of reloads and hack and even then I have helped bag someone on a server based game after 1.08. PBeM its just to easy, I have gotten several people wanting to do PBeM and no server. I just am not going to risk wasting 100's of hrs doing PBeM unless it is a personal friend.

hooooper_slith -> RE: GC sudden death or 260 VP 1941 Soviet Opponent wanted (3/29/2015 8:43:03 PM)
Mr P - do you fancy a rematch? Non-random weather ...

Peltonx -> RE: GC sudden death or 260 VP 1941 Soviet Opponent wanted (4/22/2015 8:40:39 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: hooooper Mr P - do you fancy a rematch? Non-random weather ... 1941 GC Sudden Death or Alt VC260 1.08.3 or latest. Server game Locked HQ Support Full FOW House Rules: No Para drops at all. No bombing of air bases more than 3 times a turn (after turn 1) No bombing of HQ's unless stacked with a ground unit No naval invasions before November 1941, none outside the 1939 Soviet borders before January 1943 In addition if Sevastopol is either isolated, or in German hands, none west of the Crimea, which reflects the scope for air/naval interdiction not really reflected in the game. Additional Auto VC: If the Axis player holds Leningrad, Moscow, Voronezh and Rostov concurrently at any time in 1941 he wins an Auto Victory. No need to waste any ones time as we all know the end results based on past games if these cities fall in 1941. Optional Rules Setup: Mild Blizzard Rules Non Random Weather or Random No 1-1 = 2-1 Basicly what every ones playing now, 1v1=2v1 is simply Middle Earth and why it was ever part of release no one knows. Standard Blizzard is also non-historical and was made so because of all the HQBU exploits which were never nerfed until 1.07 and 1.08. Mild Blizzard is historical.

Mehring -> RE: GC sudden death or 260 VP 1941 Soviet Opponent wanted (4/22/2015 9:26:59 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Pelton Basicly what every ones playing now, 1v1=2v1 is simply Middle Earth With the current lack of obligation or incentive to use this when it hurts the Russian I've reluctantly come to agree. Russian attack losses are far too low and they can run away all summer, then suddenly discover they have an attack doctrine. Nice idea, poor implementation and subject to gaming. Hope to see it finer tuned in WitE2

Peltonx -> (Open) Soviet Opponent wanted - GC 260 VP 1941 (4/22/2015 10:38:18 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Mehring quote: ORIGINAL: Pelton Basicly what every ones playing now, 1v1=2v1 is simply Middle Earth With the current lack of obligation or incentive to use this when it hurts the Russian I've reluctantly come to agree. Russian attack losses are far too low and they can run away all summer, then suddenly discover they have an attack doctrine. Nice idea, poor implementation and subject to gaming. Hope to see it finer tuned in WitE2 It simply will not be part of the game, because there is no need. With the combat hex added MP's, attacking will help even if your losing most of the time as Russians anyways in 41/42 summers. And yes 1v1=2v1 was exploited to death and hoooper was the best at it. I would have done the same, if your offered an I win button you take it.

Peltonx -> RE: (Open) Soviet Opponent wanted - GC 260 VP 1941 (4/22/2015 6:16:52 PM)
One of the 3 went afk so looking to start another one

Pitaman -> RE: (Open) Soviet Opponent wanted - GC 260 VP 1941 (4/27/2015 10:31:06 PM)
Pelton, I am willing to play you as the Russians. You can set the rules. I will just enjoy the experience of playing such an expert at this game. Let me know if you are interested. Best regards, Tom

Peltonx -> RE: (Open) Soviet Opponent wanted - GC 260 VP 1941 (4/28/2015 12:07:34 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Pitaman Pelton, I am willing to play you as the Russians. You can set the rules. I will just enjoy the experience of playing such an expert at this game. Let me know if you are interested. Best regards, Tom https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UTFM9MmD_Mk&list=RDBTukSakeqr4&index=2

Peltonx -> (Closed) Soviet Opponent wanted - GC 260 VP 1941 (4/28/2015 12:17:07 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Pitaman Pelton, I am willing to play you as the Russians. You can set the rules. I will just enjoy the experience of playing such an expert at this game. Let me know if you are interested. Best regards, Tom Ok

Pitaman -> RE: (Closed) Soviet Opponent wanted - GC 260 VP 1941 (5/2/2015 7:18:38 PM)
Pelton, Just finished my first turn. It would really be great if you did an AAR on our game. Would you be interested in doing that? Please advise. Thanks, Tom

Callistrid -> RE: (Closed) Soviet Opponent wanted - GC 260 VP 1941 (5/3/2015 11:01:08 AM)
Pelton, the mild blizzard, and no 1v1=2v1 rule balancing the game, but the perfect, and unhistorical opening on south (Lvov, Kowel, etc. pockets) not.

charlie0311 -> RE: (Closed) Soviet Opponent wanted - GC 260 VP 1941 (5/3/2015 2:46:36 PM)
Yeah really, or Morveal could put in the "Loki's cat" random generator. that is, the P plan is all set but, maybe AGC logistics didn't get the word (loki's cat ate the message) all the stuff went to Minsk, the Pzs in the South get frozen for a turn or two.

Peltonx -> RE: (Closed) Soviet Opponent wanted - GC 260 VP 1941 (5/3/2015 7:19:22 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Pitaman Pelton, Just finished my first turn. It would really be great if you did an AAR on our game. Would you be interested in doing that? Please advise. Thanks, Tom I generally put turn 1 up once we are done turn 5 and so on. So you can read it and post if you like.

loki100 -> RE: (Closed) Soviet Opponent wanted - GC 260 VP 1941 (5/3/2015 9:00:59 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: charlie0311 Yeah really, or Morveal could put in the "Loki's cat" random generator. that is, the P plan is all set but, maybe AGC logistics didn't get the word (loki's cat ate the message) all the stuff went to Minsk, the Pzs in the South get frozen for a turn or two. my cats are not that reliable [8D]

Page: [1]

Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.328125