Tomcat84 -> RE: A few beginner questions and the Stand Up scenario (3/26/2015 7:15:12 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: ioticus I'm surprised the scenario is still broken after 7 patches and no one noticed? (This is a stock scenario.) Is it possible for someone to upload a fixed Stand Up for me because I have no idea how to fix it myself. Well, everyone involved with this piece of software is human, so mistakes can be made. That includes the devs but also the testers and players etc. I personally never happened to play this scenario so I did not notice. I also know some people dont look at score and just evaluate themselves on how they feel they performed, rather than look at a number. And maybe since many do regard this as a beginner scenario, when they play it they dont realize the scoring issue yet? Maybe you are just very perceptive [:)] I might be able to take a look later today to make and upload a version that fixes the scoring issue, but the scenario author might do so as well? (not sure who built it) quote:
ORIGINAL: ioticus Another thing odd about this scenario is the UK is able to change its rules of engagement from tight(only engage confirmed hostiles) to anything it wants, which runs counter to the scenario description's starting rules of engagement doctrine. Not sure if this is intended. I dont think this is necessarily a problem. Really with the WCS setting you control how your units behave if left to their own devices. If you as the player want to misbehave and ignore your briefing then that is kind of your own fault. But just to illustrate, even if the setting was fixed to tight, you as the player could still select an unknown/neutral track and hit H to declare it hostile and they would still attack. So it is your own responsibility to carry out or ignore your briefing.
|
|
|
|