Mgellis -> RE: Busy Day in Burundi, 1976 -- new beta for testing (3/25/2015 7:41:53 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Quetzal Hi Mgellis. I've noticed your scenarios are usually well researched. I was wondering why you chose the UK as an intervention force in this scenario? Burundi was a francophone Belgian colony until independence. In 1976 France (since Belgium pretty much had washed its hands of anything in Africa, especially its former colonies by this point - Katanga being about their last intervention) would seem to be the logical choice for an intervention force. The Brits have never really had much interest in that region except Uganda and Kenya. Just curious what your rationale was for choosing the UK; not saying it's wrong, just wondering. France has been/is much more fond of meddling (er, I mean assisting) in that region. Excellent question. Originally, I had conceived the mission being led by a multi-national coalition and the U.K. was just doing its share as a global leader. Somehow it ended up being a U.K. mission. I can just explain that in the scenario background, though. (And maybe I'll create another scenario with French forces.) Thanks for catching that!
|
|
|
|