rkr1958 -> RE: Historical Global War AAR #2 (3/31/2015 8:48:16 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Mayhemizer How about if CW would land Denmark with HQ and Mech (div has no ZoC) and take northern port? Later bring more units and take HQ to France. After it was done to me I decided not to take Denmark with divisions anymore... Intriguing. While as the German player this would cause me some initial pain I might just prefer this. With the BEF in Denmark then the defense of France would be significantly weaken. And, it seems that four German infantry corps could keep the Brits in Denmark bottled up until pazners were ready to roll and take them out. quote:
ORIGINAL: Centuur Yes, the CW should land adjacent to the division, because the hex is probably still not Axis controlled. After that comes a nice 13-1 battle and the CW can see if they can cause trouble over there. Since the Germans put far too many units in Poland and to few against the French, the CW isn't under pressure to send the BEF into France at all. MWIF is just like chess. Force your opponent in doing things he really doesn't want to do. Mess up the enemies plans and you've won the war... The challenge for me as the axis in the early game, in this and other strategic level ww2 games, is not to let the allies dictate the action, even when they do something unexpected. Sure the could land in northern Denmark and seize the port there, but couldn't I then keep them bottled up with 2 or 3 medium strength infantry until I was ready to deal with them? You both have given me something to ponder when I make my moves as the allies. Should I do this? The only way I can answer this is that I can say if I were the CW I wouldn't risk it. Maybe I'm too cautious though?
|
|
|
|