RE: Pagan Today

RE: Pagan Today (Full Version)

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition

Message

HansBolter -> RE: Pagan Today (6/4/2015 10:54:31 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: wdolson I let the first comment on the Huffington Post go hoping it would die, then it appears I missed the first follow up comments. Let's drop the political discussion please. Bill I don't get it Bill. The very article itself is rife with a leftist slant and therefore completely political. Shouldn't you have locked the thread after the first post? I don't appreciate being singled out for a violation when the opening post constituted a political taunt.

wdolson -> RE: Pagan Today (6/4/2015 12:08:41 PM)
I don't have the time to read every article that is posted here. I briefly scanned it, but didn't read it in any depth, I missed any political slant it may have had. Bill

AW1Steve -> RE: Pagan Today (6/4/2015 12:19:29 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: HansBolter quote: ORIGINAL: wdolson I let the first comment on the Huffington Post go hoping it would die, then it appears I missed the first follow up comments. Let's drop the political discussion please. Bill I don't get it Bill. The very article itself is rife with a leftist slant and therefore completely political. Shouldn't you have locked the thread after the first post? I don't appreciate being singled out for a violation when the opening post constituted a political taunt. Hans , while Bill only has one set of eyes, forum regulars have many. Might I suggest that we notify Bill as soon as we something "political" or "offensive" as soon as we see it , and direct his attention. The major problem with this system is Bill IS only one person , who generally comes online in the afternoon. Some people have learned that by posting in the early morning , they get a large part of the day to "run free" with their posting. [:(]

Symon -> RE: Pagan Today (6/4/2015 1:54:07 PM)
I think Steve is absolutely right. Everyone knows that there are some things that seriously disturb my Wa, but I would much rather have an alternative to teeing off. It messes with my blood pressure. I fervently hope Bill is comfy with this. JWE

AW1Steve -> RE: Pagan Today (6/4/2015 2:23:56 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Symon I think Steve is absolutely right. Everyone knows that there are some things that seriously disturb my Wa, but I would much rather have an alternative to teeing off. It messes with my blood pressure. I fervently hope Bill is comfy with this. JWE Of course we COULD just form a vigilance committee and hunt said offender down with a rope , but I'm guessing that might upset Bill's "wa" a bit.....[:D]

HansBolter -> RE: Pagan Today (6/4/2015 3:17:35 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: AW1Steve quote: ORIGINAL: HansBolter quote: ORIGINAL: wdolson I let the first comment on the Huffington Post go hoping it would die, then it appears I missed the first follow up comments. Let's drop the political discussion please. Bill I don't get it Bill. The very article itself is rife with a leftist slant and therefore completely political. Shouldn't you have locked the thread after the first post? I don't appreciate being singled out for a violation when the opening post constituted a political taunt. Hans , while Bill only has one set of eyes, forum regulars have many. Might I suggest that we notify Bill as soon as we something "political" or "offensive" as soon as we see it , and direct his attention. The major problem with this system is Bill IS only one person , who generally comes online in the afternoon. Some people have learned that by posting in the early morning , they get a large part of the day to "run free" with their posting. [:(] Very good points Steve. I'm sorry for getting bent out of shape at you Bill. [:(] I should have known better than to rise to the taunt.

wdolson -> RE: Pagan Today (6/4/2015 9:59:09 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: AW1Steve Hans , while Bill only has one set of eyes, forum regulars have many. Might I suggest that we notify Bill as soon as we something "political" or "offensive" as soon as we see it , and direct his attention. The major problem with this system is Bill IS only one person , who generally comes online in the afternoon. Some people have learned that by posting in the early morning , they get a large part of the day to "run free" with their posting. [:(] I do get PMs and e-mails when something questionable is going on. It does help. And, yes vigilantism would probably not turn out well. I saw it happen on another forum when the administrator was too laid back to confront anyone. It turned into a gang war. quote: ORIGINAL: HansBolter Very good points Steve. I'm sorry for getting bent out of shape at you Bill. [:(] I should have known better than to rise to the taunt. No problem, apology accepted. Nobody was intended to get singled out here. Bill

JohnDillworth -> RE: Pagan Today (6/5/2015 9:03:32 AM)
Folks, no intention on anything political. I saw pretty pictures of a place that is in a game I play. I thought I would share those pictures. any other intentions might be something you brought in the room with you. As for the source I didn't even notice. I visit lots of web sites representing a broad range of views.

Symon -> RE: Pagan Today (6/5/2015 6:18:55 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: JohnDillworth Folks, no intention on anything political. I saw pretty pictures of a place that is in a game I play. I thought I would share those pictures. any other intentions might be something you brought in the room with you. As for the source I didn't even notice. I visit lots of web sites representing a broad range of views. John, we all know this, and we know you are righteous. You just might want to vet your "web sites representing a broad range of views" a teensy bit. Thanks, Ciao. JWE

Lowpe -> RE: Pagan Today (6/5/2015 6:51:16 PM)
I thought this was a religious post. Or perhaps MC post.[:D]

JohnDillworth -> RE: Pagan Today (6/5/2015 10:05:49 PM)
redacted

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.093994