fcharton -> RE: Being good, for a change – SqzMyLemon (J) vs fcharton (A) (2/19/2016 1:38:29 PM)
|
February 17th and 18th, 1942 Whither the paras Palembang is occupied and Japanese paras are isolated in Praboemoelih, one hex away, after they failed to capture the hex. I was expecting Joseph to move across the river, and open a supply line for his troops. But this didn’t happen, neither on the 17th, nor on the 18th. Did he forget? Elsewhere in Sumatra, after a reinforced division landed in Medan, only a regiment was sent to pursue the defeated defenders. And it seems to be proving inadequate. Today, an attack resulted in 1:2 odds. Ground combat at Langsa (46,74) Japanese Deliberate attack Attacking force 3807 troops, 20 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 127 Defending force 3695 troops, 8 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 42 Japanese adjusted assault: 26 Allied adjusted defense: 27 Japanese ground losses: 42 casualties reported Squads: 0 destroyed, 5 disabled Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled Allied ground losses: 170 casualties reported Squads: 7 destroyed, 10 disabled Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled Assaulting units: 112th Infantry Regiment Defending units: Medan Cdo Van Aarsen Cdo Sabang Cdo HQ TC Sumatra 223 Group RAF 1e-VLG-V Sup Afd 11 Battery/3 HAA The Moulmein mystery The units detected next to Moulmein yesterday were bombed today, and proved to be a lone RTA unit, now retreating towards Rahaeng. This is not the real thing yet, and Burma will probably be mine until March. I don’t complain. One British CV in is the bay of Bengal, the Hermes should join her soon. I have been sailing her close to the Japanese detection limit. I want Joseph to know she’s here, because I suspect this will slow his advance even more. And since KB seems to be staying around Australia, I am considering sending US carriers in the Indian Ocean. Go figure! Clark Field was swept today, for the first time this year. As I have very little to oppose, I had left a token CAP, a few P26A and Airacobras, outnumbered one to four. Predictable outcome, eh? Morning Air attack on Clark Field , at 79,76 Weather in hex: Partial cloud Raid spotted at 32 NM, estimated altitude 18,000 feet. Estimated time to target is 8 minutes Japanese aircraft Ki-43-Ic Oscar x 19 Ki-44 Tojo x 8 Allied aircraft P-26A x 2 P-39D Airacobra x 5 Japanese aircraft losses Ki-43-Ic Oscar: 1 destroyed Ki-44 Tojo: 1 destroyed No Allied losses Aircraft Attacking: 6 x Ki-44 Tojo sweeping at 15000 feet CAP engaged: 34th PS with P-39D Airacobra (0 airborne, 0 on standby, 0 scrambling) (5 plane(s) diverted to support CAP in hex.) 0 plane(s) not yet engaged, 0 being recalled, 5 out of immediate contact. Group patrol altitude is 13000 , scrambling fighters between 0 and 13000. Time for all group planes to reach interception is 39 minutes 6th PS PAAC with P-26A (0 airborne, 0 on standby, 1 scrambling) 1 plane(s) not yet engaged, 0 being recalled, 0 out of immediate contact. Group patrol altitude is 16000 Time for all group planes to reach interception is 21 minutes And Tracker announces four Oscars and two Tojos, for no allied losses. Take that, evil emperor! Liberating Australia Today, a first Australian base was liberated from the Japanese yoke. The Natal Mounted Rifles, a cool South African regiment sporting Marmon Herringtons, rolled inland, and liberated Tamworth. Now onward to Armidale. Both bases are unoccupied, and will certainly be recaptured, but I want to try and force Joseph to garrison his bases. I now have almost 2000 AV in Melbourne, Geelong, Wagga Wagga, and Benalla, and more are on their way. If I can force Japan to spread his units a bit, I should be able to speed recapture. More figures The VP totals were strange, today. On the 17th, Japan VP count went down 270 points, and on the 18th by 1200 more. The base point total is responsible for this, which means a huge base must be unsupplied, and Sydney is the most likely culprit. Of course, it might just be a wrong parameter: Brisbane drawing all supplies, while all the big units arrive in Sydney, but it might also mean that Japan is experiencing supply difficulties in Australia. Life of the good boys My two weeks off are ending, I will be back in Paris on Sunday and in the office on Monday. I am not happy about it, but it cannot be helped. On my reading list, last week, was a book by American designer Don Norman, titled the design of everyday things. This was my second reading of it, and as often with good books, it was even better than the first. The book is mostly a discussion about what ‘user friendly’ means. How should an object, or a computer program, actually help the user, instead of forcing him to adapt to some engineer or artist centered interface. The general idea is that objects should advertise their features (ie let one know what they can do) and provide the user with some “conceptual model” as to the way it functions. The model does not need to be correct, so long it helps operate the object. In other words, it is ok if the steering wheel doesn’t really steer your boat, so long the simple model it provides (ie same as a car) helps you control it. The most interesting part of the book is a long discussion on human error. Norman explains that we tend to use “human error” as a scapegoat for everything that goes wrong. When something goes wrong, we always look for human errors, and most of the time, stop there, he says. And as this is done in hindsight, it is usually all too easy to find a culprit. The fact that the system let the error happen is seldom questioned. I suspect this tolerance for human error is a modern thing, and the product of our education systems. In the past, when most of the people were uneducated, the idea that “errors would happen” was deeply ingrained, hence the drills, and all the foolproof procedures (especially common in the military). Moderner tend to criticize this as “inefficiencies”, and state that one should “trust the people” (because people are bright, and educated, and…), and end up giving up redundancy, which causes errors, which get punished, which creates stress, and frustration, and more errors… What I like in Norman is that he views design as a means, not as an end. Like typography, design is good when it is useful, and it sometimes happens that it is beautiful too, but beauty is not the goal. And welcome back, Obvert, it is a nice surprise! I am very curious about teaching. The few experiences I had with it were a lot of fun. On the other hand, the pay is abominable, here, and I have a family to support… I am registering for replacement postings, to test the water, I will most certainly report on this.
|
|
|
|