theGoat -> RE: Geneva Convention as Default? (1/1/2016 9:35:12 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: 76mm quote:
ORIGINAL: RickInVA In this case, however, I think that many people are reading something very unintended into the naming of the option... Then the developers have to determine what to name the option. Now I happen to think that the developers came up with quite a good name in Geneva Convention. Selected means that the Geneva Convention is being honored, not selected means it isn't. Unlike lots of others in this thread, Rick seems at least to be reading my posts. First, I have a basic question which was not answered by my review of the relevant portions of the manual: What happens if you choose the Geneva Convention option? Are all aspects of the game relating to decisions re atrocities TURNED OFF, or are the decisions sanitized so that the German player makes decisions on these topics, but only within the scope of the Geneva Convention? In my view, the former is a perfectly acceptable option (although see below), and this game would be no better or worse than any other game on this topic. The latter, however, is an unacceptable whitewash, in that these topics are still included, but the Germans are falsely portrayed as lily white, unlike the dastardly Soviets. So which is it, how does the game work? Again, if all these features are simply completely turned off, that's perfectly OK, although the name of the option certainly creates a unnecessarily misleading impression. If it doesn't matter for game purposes if the Germans are following the Geneva Convention, why say that they are? Who are you trying to appease? Names/labels do matter. I'm sorry if other players consider this issue irrelevant--I cannot. I'm also troubled by the fact that to the extent that Matrix cares about these issues, they only seem to care about how the Germans look...in another Matrix game, Matrix had no problem depicting Soviet war crimes, without any option to turn them off, but I guess that's perfectly OK? I am speaking of the scenario in a game I won't mention in which the German side's mission was to save a little Russian girl from Soviet troops which were trying to kill her (for no apparent reason). I thought it was very strange and didn't pick up the game again (which I didn't care much for anyway). And I am not looking for an atrocity simulator, as someone (who apparently hadn't read my posts) claimed, or for these issues to be addressed at all, but to the extent that these issues are addressed, they should be addressed accurately. Finally, don't get me wrong, I don't care much if Matrix wants to crank out games with German propaganda, I just don't want to buy or play them. Sorry 76mm but this is irrelevant IMO. The option is there, doesn't really matter if its the default and remember that both the Nazi and Soviet sides committed atrocities in the East, not just one side or the other, no matter what propagandists might say. The simple fact that its there at all is a major departure from most wargames. Would anyone have noticed if the designers hadn't included it as an option at all ? Probably not I think. In he game the perspectives of the Nazi and Soviet commands are different - the Soviet player doesn't have to make any of these decisions, they are made for the player by the engine. The player gets the option at the start to pretend that both sides rather than neither "played by the rules", I appreciate that you think that the default should be that they didn't and when I play I switch that option (Geneva) "Off" as that's how both sides behaved. Like it or not it's a game, not an exact historical recreation and some design decisions have to be made - at least matrix have confronted the fact that neither side did "fight fair". Would it be better to have "Off" as default ? Maybe but its not like its difficult to select the option - players who just play on default and don't even bother to look through the options wont be interested in accuracy historically or a range of other things anyway.
|
|
|
|