Bernie -> (4/1/2003 1:53:07 AM)
|
Such a tourney would have to be a round-robin setup, to eliminate (as much as possible) flukes, luck (good & bad), and simple mistakes. I suggest that at the start it be best 2 out of 3, each player on each "side" playing against each other player on the same side. Then come semi-finals, also 2 out of 3, but against only one opponent from the semi-finalists. Then the finals, the best 2 on each side play 5 out of 7 against each other (same side) to determine the best on each side. Then a best 2 out of 3 between the best of both sides. Obviously, depending on how many sign up, we're talking about a [B]lot[/B] of games (13 games minimum, if only three per side sign up)! This could take months to do it right... and to do it any other way leaves the door open for someone to later claim, "Well, it was just a lucky shot! He's not [I]really[/I] the best." (We've all heard of Kats being taken out with lucky rear hits from an M2HB, or tanks getting stuck, or mis-clicks that put you in a vulnerable position, etc.) As for me, I'll sit this one out on the sidelines. Especially since I've never actually declared a preference for either side. M4's are still "Spam Cans" (IMHO), but they're good Spam Cans, and Kats (most of them) were excellent tanks. To choose one over the other... nah, I like 'em all too much to play favorites. :)
|
|
|
|