New Scen May 42 (Full Version)

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Scenario Design and Modding



Message

Andy Mac -> New Scen May 42 (5/21/2016 11:33:57 PM)

OK also a may 42 Scen same as may 43 need feedback and corrections please this one has a working Ai but its not been tested so will need bopth data and AI feedback



Reg -> RE: New Scen May 42 (5/22/2016 1:10:08 AM)


Woo hoo!!! [sm=happy0005.gif]

Thanks a million for all your efforts Andy. [:)]




Andy Mac -> RE: New Scen May 42 (5/22/2016 1:25:49 PM)

Need comments to help finish it off



drw61 -> RE: New Scen May 42 (5/22/2016 2:37:38 PM)

Andy,
First thanks for this!
I'll take a look in the next few days and give you some feed back.

Thanks Daryl



drw61 -> RE: New Scen May 42 (5/23/2016 4:44:50 PM)

Andy,
You may want to leave some of the Philippine / USA units in play at Bataan but with high fatigue and a percentage disabled. This gives the Japanese player some extra victory points and allows the reconstruction of the 31st Inf Regiment and the 192nd / 194th Tank Bns if the allied player wants.
Also all the units (Units 5010, 5037, 5531 to 5540) in the Mindanao area have been 9999ed out. These I would again leave in with fatigue and partial disabled for points for the Japanese player.

Some marine defense units (5542, 5544 to 5547) have a delay of 9999 and probably should still be on the map.

Thanks Daryl



Reg -> RE: New Scen May 42 (5/24/2016 8:58:32 AM)


Not an in-depth evaluation but while I was clicking about I noticed the Brit 70th Inf Div in Burma doesn't have any infantry. Just some engineering squads.

Cheers,
Reg



Andy Mac -> RE: New Scen May 42 (5/24/2016 12:39:16 PM)

ps I used a lot of insight from Nik's earlier May 42 scenario in building this




Andy Mac -> RE: New Scen May 42 (5/24/2016 12:40:13 PM)

Reg 70th British is a difficult issue the 3 Bdes of Infatnry are all on map seperately but I may look to do this one a little differently before I am done.....



Andy Mac -> RE: New Scen May 42 (5/24/2016 12:44:13 PM)

Also ps locations are estimates I 'think' most of the main combat formations are in the right theatre but may be wrong



drw61 -> RE: New Scen May 42 (5/24/2016 7:00:48 PM)

To get the 1st Burma, 9th and 11th Indian divisions to show up on the map you need to clear out the following data from the editor, for some reason just 9999ing them doesn't seem to work.

Delete the following - 6302, 6320, 6321, 6657, 6658, 6731 and 6739.
Thanks Daryl



Andy Mac -> RE: New Scen May 42 (5/24/2016 8:32:54 PM)

Weird thanks Daryl



PaxMondo -> RE: New Scen May 42 (5/25/2016 2:11:41 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: drw61

To get the 1st Burma, 9th and 11th Indian divisions to show up on the map you need to clear out the following data from the editor, for some reason just 9999ing them doesn't seem to work.

Delete the following - 6302, 6320, 6321, 6657, 6658, 6731 and 6739.
Thanks Daryl

you need to delete the parent reference and 9999 them. then the full div's will appear.



Admiral DadMan -> RE: New Scen May 42 (5/25/2016 3:31:43 PM)

Question? Are Akagi, Kaga, Soryu, and Hiryu in port with significant damage to simulate being ridden hard and put away wet?



Andy Mac -> RE: New Scen May 42 (5/25/2016 6:51:08 PM)

Yes but all sys damage so quick to repair



Andy Mac -> RE: New Scen May 42 (5/25/2016 7:19:40 PM)

v 4 posted



Andy Mac -> RE: New Scen May 42 (5/29/2016 10:20:58 PM)

Bump



jakla1027 -> RE: New Scen May 42 (5/30/2016 1:14:34 AM)

I haven't tested this scenario, but I have noticed that in Nik's 1942 scenario the bug of the AI sending suicide TF to Pearl is still present. They seem to start in about July 42 and run into November 42. I'm no farther than Nov. 42 in Nik's scenario. I just thought this might be worth checking into Andy. I can't confirm, but I think it has something to do with Japan having control of Akyab or not.

Anyway I hope this helps and it's not a waste of your time. I just please ask of you to keep working on this Scenario and the AI for it. I only play agaisnt the AI so thus greatly appreciate your work on this project. [&o]



el cid again -> RE: New Scen May 42 (5/30/2016 10:57:34 AM)

If you do not assign the ships to the stock task forces, this should not happen. Assign them to ports
or to new task forces in different slots. Scrips probably use the actual task force slot - avoid that
slot and the script has nothing to boss re that slot. Or rewrite the script.


quote:

ORIGINAL: jakla1027

I haven't tested this scenario, but I have noticed that in Nik's 1942 scenario the bug of the AI sending suicide TF to Pearl is still present. They seem to start in about July 42 and run into November 42. I'm no farther than Nov. 42 in Nik's scenario. I just thought this might be worth checking into Andy. I can't confirm, but I think it has something to do with Japan having control of Akyab or not.

Anyway I hope this helps and it's not a waste of your time. I just please ask of you to keep working on this Scenario and the AI for it. I only play agaisnt the AI so thus greatly appreciate your work on this project. [&o]




Andy Mac -> RE: New Scen May 42 (5/30/2016 1:20:10 PM)

That wasn't a Nik issue I have removed that bug from the revised Ai so should not recur



John 3rd -> RE: New Scen May 42 (5/31/2016 3:07:33 AM)

Andy--what scenario and/or modified scenario is the Mod based on? I've wondered about making an April 1st or May 1st start date for RA or BTS...



jakla1027 -> RE: New Scen May 42 (5/31/2016 3:34:01 AM)

Andy,

I downloaded your 42 Scen, and have found a couple issues.

USS Hornet is located on the East Coast, should be either NW of Pearl (1-2 days out) at Sea with Enterprise returning from the Doolittle Raid or located at Pearl.

Saratoga should be at San Diego under going repairs from a torpeado hit in January. She didn't leave San Diego until June 1st

I believe all the US BB's at Pearl should be located at San Diego or San Fran, as they were being held back in reserve or under going upgrades. They put to sea off the west coast several hundred miles during the Battle of Midway, as a "plan B" in case things at midway went bad and the Japs were indeed going for the West Coast. Before Midway they didn't sortie much AFAIK.

Hope it helps[;)]



Andy Mac -> RE: New Scen May 42 (5/31/2016 10:22:25 AM)

Stock Scen 1 with updated bases and Ai - basically the revised update for Scen 1 I have been working on
quote:

ORIGINAL: John 3rd

Andy--what scenario and/or modified scenario is the Mod based on? I've wondered about making an April 1st or May 1st start date for RA or BTS...





Andy Mac -> RE: New Scen May 42 (5/31/2016 10:22:56 AM)

Thanks will adjust

quote:

ORIGINAL: jakla1027

Andy,

I downloaded your 42 Scen, and have found a couple issues.

USS Hornet is located on the East Coast, should be either NW of Pearl (1-2 days out) at Sea with Enterprise returning from the Doolittle Raid or located at Pearl.

Saratoga should be at San Diego under going repairs from a torpeado hit in January. She didn't leave San Diego until June 1st

I believe all the US BB's at Pearl should be located at San Diego or San Fran, as they were being held back in reserve or under going upgrades. They put to sea off the west coast several hundred miles during the Battle of Midway, as a "plan B" in case things at midway went bad and the Japs were indeed going for the West Coast. Before Midway they didn't sortie much AFAIK.

Hope it helps[;)]





Chris21wen -> RE: New Scen May 42 (6/4/2016 7:30:04 AM)

A minor problem. First turn and I note this strange objective.



[image]local://upfiles/5388/EE2DF7B880334B46A02FB68FDAA080CB.jpg[/image]



Admiral DadMan -> RE: New Scen May 42 (6/4/2016 6:25:45 PM)

Aircraft
#424 F4F-3P should be Type 05 Recon, build rate 10.
#426 F4F-7 should be carrier capable, start month 9, and build rate 25.

Air Group
#1725 VS-8 should be (#487) SBD-3 Dauntless
#1726 VB-8 should be (#487) SBD-3 Dauntless
#1778 VT-71 should be (#495) TBF Avenger



BillBrown -> RE: New Scen May 42 (6/5/2016 1:18:40 PM)

No mods are necessary. Uses standard stock map.



Chris21wen -> RE: New Scen May 42 (6/6/2016 4:43:32 PM)

Don't know if this is specific to this scenario but I've never seen the RAF Battle it the game before. There is no image for it.



[image]local://upfiles/5388/9CBD9B7AF95C441F89A3A77E974220DB.jpg[/image]



Reg -> RE: New Scen May 42 (6/7/2016 10:01:27 AM)


Like this....



[image]local://upfiles/446/61A18AFAD7324131A3B2E04E658D64B3.gif[/image]



Page: [1] 2   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
3.96875