RE: RA 7.9 (Full Version)

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Scenario Design and Modding



Message

John 3rd -> RE: RA 7.9 (6/19/2017 3:06:55 PM)

Kitakami:

GREAT to see you Posting! Welcome, as always, Kind Sir.

Will look into your comments.



Kitakami -> RE: RA 7.9 (6/20/2017 1:10:20 PM)

Another minor find. In BtS Lite, AV Sanyo Maru has a plane capacity of 9, but her air units start with sizes of 9 + 5. Perhaps they should be as other AV air units, 6 + 3?



Kitakami -> RE: RA 7.9 (7/10/2017 2:00:27 AM)

A question for BtS Lite:

Is the first turret of HMS Enterprise (CL) supposed to be 6in/50BL Mk XXIII, or should it be 6in/45BL Mk XII like the other turrets on the ship?



John 3rd -> RE: RA 7.9 (7/10/2017 2:37:02 AM)

Hmmm....

Not something that would have been messed with by us so I would assume...



Kitakami -> RE: RA 7.9 (7/12/2017 10:14:39 PM)

Also... the SS Pegase has 2 tubes armed with the 400mm 26V torpedo, while all the other tubes are armed with the 550mm 24V torpedo. Is that correct?



Skyland -> RE: RA 7.9 (7/13/2017 9:36:00 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kitakami

Also... the SS Pegase has 2 tubes armed with the 400mm 26V torpedo, while all the other tubes are armed with the 550mm 24V torpedo. Is that correct?


Yes it is correct.
2 types of torpedos on french subs at that time.
According to the doctrine the 400mm was to be used against merchants and 550mm against warships.



Kitakami -> RE: RA 7.9 (7/13/2017 1:01:03 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Skyland
Yes it is correct.
2 types of torpedos on french subs at that time.
According to the doctrine the 400mm was to be used against merchants and 550mm against warships.


One learns something new everyday. Thanks, Skyland!



John 3rd -> RE: RA 7.9 (7/14/2017 4:32:52 AM)

I have a period of time coming up--hopefully--where I shall be by myself with no interruptions. It is at that point that I plan some serious Mod work. Keep the notes and comments coming. Work SHALL be done.



Lecivius -> RE: RA 7.9 (7/14/2017 12:42:42 PM)

Here's a thought for you. We were talking about you on another thread.



[image]local://upfiles/26061/5E95FBCC52924C06B02E6997D07C3FC1.jpg[/image]



John 3rd -> RE: RA 7.9 (7/15/2017 12:56:22 PM)

YES!

Can someone please come up with some stats for this class of Star Destroyer???



Kitakami -> RE: RA 7.9 (7/15/2017 6:46:40 PM)

I only know one... it is an IJN ship! [:D]



Kitakami -> RE: RA 7.9 (7/17/2017 12:40:06 AM)

In BtS Lite, the squadrons on board CVL Wellington are Australian. Is that as intended?



ny59giants -> RE: RA 7.9 (7/17/2017 11:37:35 AM)

In BTS Lite, 2nd gen George's are CV capable. Was this suppose to be changed or WAD?



Kitakami -> RE: RA 7.9 (7/22/2017 2:28:25 PM)

In BTS Lite, the CV Lexington class upgrade path is in numerical order (674->675->676...) but the AAA power levels have a weird progression (675 is 1702, while 676 is 1408). Is that as intended?



Falken -> RE: RA 7.9 (7/22/2017 3:22:41 PM)

Good to see you back Jorge.
Glad you are ok.....



Kitakami -> RE: RA 7.9 (7/22/2017 3:32:38 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Falken

Good to see you back Jorge.
Glad you are ok.....


Actually, I am not. But I need to keep my mind active :)



btd64 -> RE: RA 7.9 (7/22/2017 3:41:54 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kitakami

In BTS Lite, the CV Lexington class upgrade path is in numerical order (674->675->676...) but the AAA power levels have a weird progression (675 is 1702, while 676 is 1408). Is that as intended?


I remember someone had this same question years ago. If I remember right it had something to do with gaining bigger guns and cutting back on smaller guns. Also your Range improves some. If I remember correctly[&:]....GP



Kitakami -> RE: RA 7.9 (7/22/2017 3:50:20 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: General Patton
I remember someone had this same question years ago. If I remember right it had something to do with gaining bigger guns and cutting back on smaller guns. Also your Range improves some. If I remember correctly[&:]....GP


Ah, yes! I see it now. there is a gain of 4x 5" guns at a cost of 12x 1.1". Interesting.



btd64 -> RE: RA 7.9 (7/22/2017 4:00:14 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kitakami

quote:

ORIGINAL: General Patton
I remember someone had this same question years ago. If I remember right it had something to do with gaining bigger guns and cutting back on smaller guns. Also your Range improves some. If I remember correctly[&:]....GP


Ah, yes! I see it now. there is a gain of 4x 5" guns at a cost of 12x 1.1". Interesting.



Bingo....GP



Kitakami -> RE: RA 7.9 (7/26/2017 10:11:57 PM)

when they arrive, CA Algerie and CL LaMotte-Piquet have no search plane unit on board. Is that by design?



ny59giants -> RE: RA 7.9 (7/27/2017 12:39:03 PM)

G6 CVL has no delay for first upgrade. Nice to have radar installed in less than 24 hours. [;)]



Admiral DadMan -> RE: RA 7.9 (7/27/2017 1:05:54 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ny59giants

G6 CVL has no delay for first upgrade. Nice to have radar installed in less than 24 hours. [;)]

That's the follow up visit so that the cable guy can plug it in...



John 3rd -> RE: RA 7.9 (7/28/2017 4:04:31 AM)

News: School begins for my wife next week and then the boys begin the following Monday. With them AWAY...I plan to do some of the Mod work that has been detailed above. PLEASE keep the thoughts coming and FIND the issues so I can get them fixed.



Admiral DadMan -> RE: RA 7.9 (7/28/2017 3:33:15 PM)

Just a question for clarification (I'm old and confused, lol): Do ALL of your scenarios use Extended Map? If not, which ones use which?



John 3rd -> RE: RA 7.9 (7/28/2017 8:45:45 PM)

Every one does.

I love the extra brought in by that!



John 3rd -> RE: RA 7.9 (7/28/2017 8:46:15 PM)

Also..do not forget the Off-Map aircraft purchase system we have introduced for the Allies.



Admiral DadMan -> RE: RA 7.9 (7/28/2017 9:30:49 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: John 3rd

Every one does.

I love the extra brought in by that!


Excellent.

Not every scenario description on the website says "Extended Map". Or I missed it.



Mundy -> RE: RA 7.9 (7/29/2017 2:46:49 PM)

Hi,

One suggestion, if I may.

I'm trying to get all the map and art files for these scenarios straightened out.

It would be helpful if the zipfiles for these had the same directory structure as the game does. I'm having to pick and sort some of these files by hand.

Thanks

Ed



John 3rd -> RE: RA 7.9 (7/29/2017 2:51:27 PM)

Good note Sir. Will look into it with my Site.



John 3rd -> RE: RA 7.9 (7/29/2017 2:59:52 PM)

Michael raised an interesting question. Can anyone opine on this?

Why does the smaller Hiryu Class have greater endurance that the Shokaku Class which is about 8500 tonnes larger? Speed is similar….



Page: <<   < prev  7 8 [9] 10 11   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
0.84375