opusthefowl -> Please Reconsider You Pricing Strategy (10/10/2016 7:24:06 PM)
|
Hello, First-off, let me acknowledge right out of the box that most games here are more on the niche side of gaming rather than mainstream. Because of this, in general, I agree that companies will price their products a bit higher or a bit lower to fight the "niche" label to attract more purchases…Matrix on the other hand seems to go for the much higher route…and I think that’s a shame. I am not talking about new games at all as for the most part, their pricing is fine. What I would like to address is their stock of older games. A few examples: Gary Grigsby's Eagle Day to Bombing the Reich A repackaging (with polish) of two games from 1999, released 7 years ago (original games from 1999): $71 Larry Bond's Harpoon - Ultimate Edition To celebrate the 20th anniversary, in 2010, released 6 years ago for a game 25+ years old: $85 Steel Panthers: World at War - Generals Edition Released 16 years ago: $71 Hornet Leader PC Released 9 years ago: $43 It just goes on and on… The pricing strategy of games 5+ years and older just seems so absolutely out of whack that one has to ask themselves, what are they thinking? I hope this thread starts a meaningful discussion and encourages Matrix to rethink their pricing strategy on their older titles. I’d love to buy some titles here but when faced with the choice of older top tier games in the $5-$10 range on Steam, GOG, Bundle Stars or Humble Bundle or a very old game that I’ll have to fight just to run on a modern PC and pay $70+ for that “privilege”, the choice is easy… Thanks
|
|
|
|