Dixie -> RE: OT:Flying B-17 and Lancaster Bombers in Air Show! (10/15/2016 11:28:25 AM)
|
I've had a look around a B-17 and spent many hours flying in Lancasters. I've been lucky enough to fly on both airworthy Lancasters and been sick on more than one occcassion! [sm=vomit-smiley-020.gif] It was cold and draughty in the air (even at only a couple of thousand feet) and hot on the ground. It vibrated and shook in the air and suffered from a build up of exhaust fumes in the fuselage (which is why the BBMF usually fly with their escape hatches out) especially by the W/Op position. But I wouldn't have missed any of the trips I did. The Lancaster was built around the bomb bay and then packed with fuel, ammunition and other equipment. The only place I could stand up straight was by the rear door. The Canadian based Lanc has a bit more room inside, the BBMF one hass a mostly wartime fit inside, with ammunition tracks, mid-upper turret mechanisms, dummy parachutes and oxygen bottles, wartime radio and a partial bomb sight in the nose. I wasn't a big fan of the B-17 and the open baomb bay though. [X(] It's basically a reverse TARDIS, far smaller on the inside than it appears from the outside [:D] Summer 2014 was a good one. [image]local://upfiles/20142/0AF1123848A94F5984A3E6B9D99122D0.jpg[/image]
|
|
|
|