davidachamberlain -> RE: US Invades Kwajalein causes US Entry Action - Japan militarizes Marshalls (1/24/2017 2:53:02 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Centuur quote:
ORIGINAL: davidachamberlain quote:
ORIGINAL: Shannon V. OKeets The decision about how to code this was made by others, before I became involved with MWIF - that is, before 2004. I am always reluctant to vacate those decisions without a really good reason. This definitely looks like a bug to me. The US should not be triggering Japanese US entry actions. Only Japan should be triggering those. I assume since the US is trying to invade a Japan hex, that either Japan has already declared war on US (or the reverse) or this is incorrectly being triggered when the US should not even be allowed to make that move. I suggest you should look into this further. It is probably showing the wrong text box as it should either not be allowed to happen at all (as in before US and Japan are at war) or if they are at war, it should have no blocking message at all. I looked at the US entry options and Japan already militarized the Marshalls (#3) and already declared war on the US (#13). There should no longer be any Japan related US entry actions related to the Marshalls, since those are both irrelevant. Dave The last sentence isn't true. If a chit get's added due to f.e. the Japanese taking Singapore, when at war with the US, this influences the chances that the US can DoW the Euroaxis.... Then help me to understand why (in this case) with the Marshalls already being militarized (3rd option chosen) and US already being at war with Japan (also at war with CW), why when the US tries to "invade" the Marshalls that a message regarding Japan militarizing the Marshalls pops up. That popup should not happen again in the game since it happened earlier in the game. You can not go and Militarize the Marshalls multiple times and the US invading should not Militarize the Marshalls, either. Again, as I mentioned, this has to be a bug. I can not see what event should be invoked from this action, but it should not be this one, regardless. Dave
|
|
|
|